DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<     >Side Bars<
& The Top – Below Ti  tle>PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
PLEASE ACCEPT MY APOLOGY: 
For any adverts that may follow this,
in text or at the end
which may well be inappropriate
or even offensive.
I regret we have no control over adverts
or their number, which may be displayed!
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

G.L-W’s ECLECTIC VIEWS & WEBLOG

.

.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:

Greg Lance – Watkins
GregLW            GL-W
GLW Documents

eMail:

Greg_L-W@BTconnect.co

ControversiallyGreg@Gmail.com

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

follow me on
TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW
&
https://twitter.com/Controv44553741
& on

PARLER:
https://parler.com/GregLW

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

LL 03

Hi,

you will note that a couple of days ago, having read about a dozen serious articles reporting on the trial of Lucy Letby, it became clear to me that there was every possibility her guilty verdict COULD be the greatest miscarriage of justice in modern history.

I note from The Telegraph, sometime after I voiced my concerns, a body of Lawyers have mirrored my concerns.

That various Black Racists have seen fit to pretend the guilt is a matter of this highly qualified nurse being white is an obscenity, not founded on an iota of fact – let us remember the Pakistani, Bangladeshi & Kashmiri Muslim rape gangs that Police, Councillors & the Labour head of the CPS Kier Starmer & other Labour politicians failed to bring to Court for their grooming & rape of a huge number of underage white girls, to avoid upsetting coloured aliens who they counted on for votes!

Minded of the background where it is hard to justify trusting Government, who lurch from one fraudulent claim to another, the Blob that seemingly works for and supports almost anyone who opposes the wishes of British citizens and the interests of our country and the Police who seem to have lost interest in doing their job & often don’t even turn-up to investigate – perhaps because they are outside the Courts waiting to have their case for rape or racism, murder or misogyny heard!

Alison Pearson’s assessment of the NHS as ‘Rancid with cover-up and corruption’ CLICK HERE further undermines the concern that justice may well have let Lucy Letby down just as it has in its repeated actions against the interests of Britain and the peoples of Britain as it acts in an overtly political manner in its own interests.
I contend that there is every reason to believe that in this case Justice has not been seen to be done and that to sentence someone to death one needs better standards than we have seen in this case. Do not for a moment consider that a lesser burden of proof is needed for a whole-life tariff, as a sentence it is a lifetime of fear and an eternity with no hope or future.
The deaths in question were in 2015 & 16 and when it came to trial the police and CPS had agreed to present 20 cases, presumably those they were most certain of – yet it seems there was no proof beyond circumstantial evidence and what could well be no more than malicious gossip designed to apportion blame for a worrying level of failure. There seems to have been no forensic or hard evidence conclusively proving Lucy Letby’s malicious and murderous intent. To pass the whole-life sentence surely guilt should be unanimously agreed yet even the 7 guilty verdicts could only be obtained with acceptance of majority votes – so what of the supposedly identical not guilty cases?I make no claim of Lucy Letby being innocent of the crimes but I am concerned that the only real evidence released were the items pictured below, that are so very ambiguous and can be seen to be self-doubt but it is hard to see them as in any way self-congratulatory or gleeful. There seems to be no background of evil, no track record of escalating cruelty – just what was this woman’s motivation? It is hard to believe that she was so ill-informed, being so well qualified, as to believe she could possibly have committed these murders and of the 20 very similar charges only a majority managed to find her guilty in just 7 instances.
Further it is of concern that although there were 5 senior Doctors who reported their concerns, there were a number of Doctors and many of her direct colleagues who spoke out in her direct support even after her arrest and indeed subsequent to the trial and verdict. There is inuendo led that she was in an inappropriate relationship with a married Doctor yet no actual evidence seems to have been provided and in the conversations published there is no provenance, merely concern by a supportive colleague!Yes I am concerned she just might be a scapegoat for a grossly broken system!We KNOW the system is broken, we KNOW bullying is rife, we KNOW the management is inept and incompetent, we KNOW death rates are higher than they should be, we KNOW there is a culture of Euthenasia in some areas, we KNOW scapegoating and threats are common place, we KNOW there are whistleblowers, we KNOW early retirement is frequent, we KNOW waiting lists are unacceptable, we KNOW some units take on lost causes – consider heart disease deaths in the BRI which were made an issue of blame when they were Doctors taking on lost causes from other units in a desperate last hope!

Clearly the possibility of a knee-jerk reaction enacting law to force, indeed use force to bring someone to court for sentencing is not just a level of barbarism I find distasteful, verging in its own way on being a violent crime, demeaning the very verdicts it seeks to uphold but also being a folly of staggering proportions.

Certain psychopaths derive their pleasure from the suffering they have inflicted – just as some collect momentoes of their crimes. Can we reasonably or rationally risk forcing someone to court to hear the Judge’s summing up and sentence when they may take the opportunity of disruption or obscenity, incitement or insult to their victims – there may indeed be a better case for insisting they are held incommunicado in a cell with video streaming to the cell but none from it and the express warning that if any outrage takes place the entire proceedings will be streamed to the prison in which they are to be held and to prisons to which they are subsequently transferred as a controlling deterrent.

Greg_Lance-Watkins
@Greg_LW
I would be fascinated if ANYONE can identify ANY hard evidence that #Lucy_Letby killed ANYONE – I submit circumstantial evidence & potentially malicious gossip is inadequate to sentence someone to ‘whole-life’, This COULD possibly be the victimisation of a whistleblower!

Image

Lumberis
@john1576
Greg. Interesting. But Lucy does at least ‘seem’ guilty. Although she should be protected from the hate brigade because it is not certain beyond doubt that she killed anyone.

LL DOODLES page 01 .jpg

LL DOODLES page 02

LL DOODLES page 03

LL MESSAGES 01

LL MESSAGES 02

Lucy Letby’s bedroom was also featured with the comment that it was untidy,

LL BED 02
but without pointing out she was arrested at 06:00hrs after she had returned from a holiday in Ibeza, little wonder her suitcase and other items were not yet put away – the room was in fact relatively tidy and obviously clean and well maintained – the police/courts publishing the pictures rather backfired!

How a 25-year-old nurse became Britain’s worst baby serial killer

For at least a year, Lucy Letby attacked and murdered the most vulnerable infants in her care

Lucy Letby in police interview
Lucy Letby will be sentenced for the murder of seven babies and the attempted murder of another six

The verdicts in the trial of Lucy Letby confirm her status as Britain’s worst child killer.

For at least a year, the neonatal nurse attacked and killed the most vulnerable infants in her care, causing unimaginable grief to their families.

Here, we trace how her offending began and how she was eventually brought to justice when colleagues accepted the unthinkable and raised the alarm.

Baby A

At 8.20pm on June 8 2015, a twin boy who was being cared for in the neonatal intensive care unit at the Countess of Chester Hospital suddenly stopped breathing.

With his desperate parents looking on, doctors and nurses battled for more than half an hour to resuscitate the tiny infant.

“Please don’t let my baby die,” his tearful mother begged the medical team.

But despite their best efforts, the little boy could not be saved and the heartbreaking decision was taken to stop CPR. He was pronounced dead at 8.58pm.

Everyone on the ward appeared devastated, none more so than Lucy Letby, the 25-year-old staff nurse, who had been in charge of the infant’s care in his final hours.

Taking hand and footprints and a lock of hair from the child, who can only be identified as Baby A, Letby created a memory box for his broken parents.

“I thought it was a nice thing to do,” she would later explain.

Jurors convicted Letby of the murder of Baby A by a majority of 10-1.

Lucy Letby
Letby attacked and killed the most vulnerable infants in her care

While some sick and premature babies do inevitably die, the sudden and unexpected loss of Baby A was a mystery.

Despite being born nine weeks premature, weighing less than four pounds, to a mother who had an auto-immune condition, the little boy had been doing well in the first few hours of his life.

Doctors noted a mottled rash on his skin around the time he collapsed, but a post-mortem examination could find no obvious cause for Baby A’s sudden and unexpected deterioration.

Over the next 12 months, however, this agonising sequence of events would be played out time and time again on the ward, with 17 babies collapsing, nine of whom never recovered.

Medics struggled to understand what was going on. But they noted there was one common denominator in all of the cases – the presence of Letby, the nurse who had done so much to try to comfort the parents of Baby A.

The Countess of Chester Hospital
Letby worked at The Countess of Chester Hospital CREDIT: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

Using a variety of methods including injecting air into their feeding tubes and stomachs, poisoning them with insulin, smothering or deliberately overfeeding them, Letby was eventually accused of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder 10 more.

While police and prosecutors worked out how she was attacking the defenceless infants, there was little clue as to why.

A popular and professional nurse from a loving family, the question of what had motivated this killing spree against the most vulnerable members of society may never be answered.

Baby B

But what is known is that once she started, she found it impossible to stop. Just 27 hours after Baby A died, his twin sister, Baby B, also collapsed on the unit.

While she had been more poorly than her brother at birth, she had been rallying and her collapse was again entirely unexpected.

Her parents, who were still coming to terms with the loss of their baby son, were forced to watch the desperate attempts to resuscitate their surviving child.

“Not my baby, not again,” her mother cried out.

Lucy Letby
Medics noted there was one common denominator in all of the cases – the presence of Letby CREDIT: Cheshire Constabulary

Fortunately, the doctors were able to stabilise Baby B and she recovered. But they were once again baffled as to why her deterioration had been so sudden.

As in the previous case, they had noted the presence of an odd rash on the baby’s skin and thought it unusual. But at that stage, nobody suspected Letby had tried to kill the siblings by injecting air into their bodies.

Jurors convicted Letby of the attempted murder of Baby B by a majority of 10-1.

Baby C

Four days later, on June 14, another premature baby suddenly collapsed and died on the ward.

Baby C had been delivered on June 10 at 30 weeks and weighed less than two pounds, with the nurse looking after him describing him as “the smallest baby I have ever seen”.

Despite the odds being against him, he initially did well. But when he was four days old his heart rate and oxygen levels crashed without warning.

The nurse who had been looking after him said the collapse happened when she moved away the incubator at around 11.15pm.

When she returned, she said Letby was standing by the cot.

Doctors tried to resuscitate Baby C, but around midnight it became clear he was not going to pull through and he was pronounced dead.

The post-mortem examination initially put the death down to natural causes, but medical experts later concluded Baby C had died as a result of having air pumped into his stomach, which pushed his diaphragm up and made it impossible for his lungs to inflate.

Jurors convicted Letby of the murder of Baby C by a majority of 10-1. 

Baby D

A week went by before Letby struck again, this time attacking a baby girl.

Baby D was the only one of the victims who had not been born prematurely and was in the neonatal unit because she had developed an infection. 

She was doing well and was not expected to deteriorate. But on the night of June 21, she collapsed three times and eventually could not be resuscitated.

Baby D’s father later said: “I was never given the impression that my daughter’s condition was life-threatening and it didn’t even cross my mind that she was in danger of dying. When she died, we were just not prepared for it.”

Experts subsequently concluded that Letby had made three attempts on the little girl’s life by injecting air into her bloodstream, eventually succeeding in killing her at the third attempt.

The neonatal unit had now seen three deaths and an unexpected collapse in a fortnight and Dr Stephen Brearey, who was in charge, was so concerned he carried out an informal review, discussing the matter with his colleague, Dr Ravi Jayaram, a consultant paediatrician.

They noted that Letby had been on duty on each occasion but, at that stage, the matter was not taken any further.

Jurors convicted Letby of the murder of Baby D by a majority of 10-1. 

Baby E

There were no more attacks in June or July, but on Aug 4, Letby killed one of two identical twin boys, who had been born prematurely.

The mother should have given birth at Liverpool Women’s Hospital, but it was full, so she was admitted to the Countess.

Both boys were in the intensive care section of the ward and on the evening of Aug 3, their mother discovered Baby E screaming with blood coming from his throat.

Letby was sitting at her workstation close by, apparently ignoring the screaming. She attempted to reassure the mother that everything was fine.

But later that evening, Baby E vomited a large volume of blood, equating to a quarter of all that was in his body. The doctor in charge said he had never seen such significant blood loss in a small baby.

At around 11.40pm, Baby E’s oxygen levels suddenly plummeted and medics found themselves battling to save his life.

Letby in the dock at Manchester Crown Court
Letby in the dock at Manchester Crown Court CREDIT: Elizabeth Cook/PA

Tragically, there was nothing they could do and at 1.40am he was pronounced dead. In what has now been acknowledged as a major mistake, no post-mortem examination was ordered.

Experts later concluded that Baby E had been killed as a result of having a breathing tube or some other form of equipment forced down his throat, as well as having air pumped into his stomach.

As the parents struggled to come to terms with the sudden loss of one of their baby twins, Letby finished her shift and went home.

The next day when she returned to work, she tried to kill his brother.

Jurors convicted Letby of the murder of Baby E by a majority of 10-1. 

Baby F

Baby F needed to be resuscitated at birth and had low blood sugar levels, so was put on a nutrient drip to help stabilise him.

This should have resulted in his blood sugar levels rising but inexplicably, they continued to go down. It was only when his feed bag was changed that he started to stabilise.

In an effort to understand what was going on, a sample of Baby F’s blood was analysed. It showed high levels of synthetic insulin, the hormone that reduces blood sugar.

Experts later concluded that somebody on the ward must have deliberately tampered with the feed bags, contaminating them with insulin.

Fortunately, Baby F survived, but it would not be the only time Letby would try to use insulin.

Jurors unanimously convicted Letby of the attempted murder of Baby F.

Baby G

Several weeks went by without incident but then, on Sept 7, Letby would make the first of several attempts to murder Baby G.

This little girl was the most premature of all the babies in the case, having been born in May and weighing just 1lbs 2oz

She was an IVF baby and her mother had experienced a difficult pregnancy, with her waters breaking at 23 weeks and six days.

She was born while her mother was sitting on the toilet at Arrowe Park Hospital and initially was given just a five per cent chance of survival.

Despite this, she made good progress and was eventually well enough to be transferred to the Countess, closer to her parents’ home.

The neonatal unit at the Countess of Chester Hospital
Letby worked at the neonatal unit at the Countess of Chester Hospital

At 2am on Sept 7, on the eve of what was her 100-day milestone, she vomited violently and collapsed.

Doctors were able to resuscitate her but it was later concluded that Letby had tried to kill her by deliberately overfeeding her with milk and injecting air into her stomach.

She was transferred back to Arrowe Park for more specialist care but recovered well enough to return to The Countess, only for Letby to try to finish what she had started.

On Sept 21, Baby G collapsed twice and stopped breathing. On the second occasion, the monitor that should have alerted the staff to any problems had been switched off.

While doctors were able to resuscitate her and she was eventually discharged, a scan later revealed she had suffered irreversible brain damage.

She is unlikely ever to walk, is visually impaired and needs round-the-clock care.

Jurors found Letby not guilty of one count of attempted murder of Baby G but found her guilty of another two.

Baby H

The next two attacks were alleged to have taken place just a week later on consecutive nights against Baby H, who had been born six weeks early.

Jurors found her not guilty of one of the attacks and were unable to reach a verdict on the remaining charge. 

Letby had been a popular and professional nurse from a loving family

Baby I

Three days after attempting to kill Baby H, Letby attacked a premature baby girl three times, succeeding in murdering her on the fourth attempt.

The first attack took place on Sept 30, when Letby was working a day shift. Without warning, Baby I’s stomach swelled up and she began to struggle to breathe.

Doctors managed to stabilise her, but X-rays later showed a huge amount of gas in her stomach and bowels crushing her lungs.

Baby I recovered well and doctors were even talking about discharging her but, in the early hours of Oct 12, Letby made another attempt on her life.

Medics stabilised her again, but just a few hours later there was a third collapse.

“Our daughter seemed to deteriorate whenever we left her alone and predominantly at night,” said her mother.

She was transferred to Arrowe Park, where she quickly recovered and was able to return to the Countess. But on Oct 22 when Letby was back on a night shift, she attacked Baby I again, finally succeeding in murdering her.

Letby sent a sympathy card to the parents and would later tell one of her colleagues: “It’s always me when it happens. My babies.”

On the day of Baby I’s death, an email was sent to staff expressing concerns about an increase in mortality rates on the unit.

Concerns were also shared with Alison Kelly, who was the director of nursing in October 2015, but she dismissed the idea that a member of staff might be involved as “unlikely”.

Jurors convicted Letby of the murder of Baby I by a majority of 10-1. 

Baby J

Just over a month later, Letby was alleged to have resumed her attacks.

Baby J, who had been born at 32 weeks, required bowel surgery after birth, but was doing well. Her parents had been preparing to take her home when she suffered two seizures in quick succession.

Fortunately, Baby J recovered quickly, but it was later alleged that the attack was “consistent with some form of obstruction of her airways, such as smothering”.

The jury was ultimately unable to reach a verdict on this charge and could not determine whether Letby was responsible for the attack.

Over the Christmas holidays, Letby temporarily stopped trying to kill the children in her care, and there was a brief period of calm at the hospital.

Lucy Letby caused unimaginable grief to families of her victims

Baby K

The next alleged attack took place against Baby K, who was born extremely prematurely at 25 weeks weighing just one and a half pounds.

For such a tiny baby, she was in good condition, but as a precaution arrangements were made to transfer her to the more specialist Arrowe Park.

Baby K eventually stabilised, but died three days later of an unrelated complication, meaning Letby was not charged with her murder. 

The jury was unable to reach a verdict on whether she attempted to kill Baby K.

Babies L and M

In early April, Letby moved into a new three-bedroom home in Chester, close to the hospital.

Around the same time, twin boys Babies L and M were born at the Countess and admitted to the neonatal unit.

Baby L had low blood sugar so was put on a glucose drip. But as in the case of Baby F seven months earlier, Letby used a feed bag that had been contaminated with insulin.

As medics tried to stabilise Baby L, Letby texted her mother: “Is dad betting on the Grand National? If so can he see which are greys and put a bet on for me please x.”

An hour later, she messaged friends about having an “unpacking party” to celebrate moving into her new house.

“Looking forward to a catch-up. Got magnum prosecco and vodka, woop. No disco ball but sure we can manage,” she wrote.

Baby L recovered, but just before 4pm his twin brother collapsed and needed to undergo life-saving CPR led by Dr Jayaram, who again noted a distinctive rash on the infant’s skin.

At 5.25pm, Letby’s mother texted her to tell her that her horse, Rule The World, had won the Grand National. 

Half an hour later, Letby messaged a friend: “Work has been sh-te but … I’ve just won £135 on the Grand National!”

While Baby M survived the attack, he suffered permanent brain damage.

Jurors convicted Letby of the attempted murder of Baby L by a majority of 10-1. They also convicted Letby of the attempted murder of Baby M by a majority of 10-1. 

Baby N

In early June, Baby N was born. Because he had haemophilia, was admitted to the neonatal unit.

Around six hours after he was born, Letby came on shift and expressed an interest in his blood condition, texting a friend to say the infant only had a 50 per cent chance of survival.

At around 1am, nurse Chris Booth, who was looking after Baby N, went for a short break. Seven minutes later, while he was away, the child began screaming. 

He stabilised, and over the next 12 days began to improve. On June 14, doctors told his parents they could take him home the following day.

tmg.video.placeholder.alt wdOEyZejkmc

But Letby was determined not to let that happen. At some point on the morning of June 15, she thrust a tube down his throat.

A team of specialists were called in from Alder Hey Hospital in order to try and get to the bottom of what was going on.

But Letby was agitated by their presence, saying to one colleague: “Who are these people?”

It was around this time that Letby’s friendship with a male medic, who can only be identified as Dr A, began to develop.

The pair began messaging one another late at night about what was happening on the ward, regularly commenting on how well they worked together.

Prosecutors would later allege that Letby was attacking babies because she enjoyed being in the drama of an emergency alongside Dr A.

Baby N made a full recovery and as his parents prepared to leave the Countess with him, Letby hugged the child’s mother and said: “I hope he’s OK.”

The following day, Letby went to Ibiza for a week’s holiday. When she arrived home on June 22, she texted a colleague about her impending return to the neonatal unit.

“Probably be back in with a bang lol,” she said. 

The following day, she attacked again.

Jurors convicted Letby of the attempted murder of Baby N by a majority of 10-1. They could not reach a verdict on two other counts of attempted murder.

Lucy Letby
After a holiday to Ibiza, Letby told a colleague she would ‘probably be back in with a bang’

Babies O and P

Baby O and Baby P were two of a set of naturally conceived identical triplets and were in a relatively healthy condition before Letby returned to work at 7.30am on June 23.

After a quiet morning, during which Letby texted a colleague about her holiday and the fact she had a student nurse “glued to her”, Baby O suffered a “remarkable deterioration”.

The medical team managed to temporarily revive him briefly before he later suffered another, fatal collapse. 

A post-mortem examination found unclotted blood in Baby O from a liver injury, which led a coroner to conclude his death was due to natural causes. 

An independent pathologist, who later reviewed the case, said the boy had suffered an “impact injury” akin to a road traffic collision.

That night, Letby spent four hours talking to Dr A about the death of the baby boy.

Dr Brearey was now so concerned about what was happening on the unit that he decided to raise the matter with hospital managers the next day.

But before he was able to do that, Baby P suddenly deteriorated and died.

The triplet’s parents had now lost two children in less than 24 hours and begged ambulance staff to move the surviving infant to another hospital.

The deaths of the two boys was the “tipping point” for the hospital and four days later the decision was made to remove Letby from front-line nursing duties.

Jurors unanimously convicted Letby of the murder of Baby O. Jurors convicted Letby of the murder of Baby P by a majority of 10-1. 

Baby Q

Before she was finally removed and placed in a non-clinical role, another baby died in the unit.

Jurors, however, were unable to reach a verdict on the charge of attempted murder relating to Baby Q.

Even after she was removed from front-line duties, hospital managers repeatedly attempted to have Letby reinstated and the deaths were not referred to the police for another 11 months.

While under suspicion, Letby continued to socialise with her friends, posting pictures of fun nights out with friends and colleagues as if she did not have a care in the world. 

tmg.video.placeholder.alt EYR7llE-AOk

She even lodged a formal grievance against the hospital for her removal from the neonatal ward. 

But on July 3 2018, just over two years after she was removed from the neonatal unit, Letby was arrested on suspicion of murder

Taken from her home in Chester in handcuffs, Letby spent hours being questioned by detectives but maintained a cold, detached air, denying everything.

However, rambling notes recovered from her home helped persuade police she was guilty.

One line read: “I am evil I did this,” while another read: “I don’t deserve to live. I killed them on purpose because I am not good enough. I am evil. I did this.” 

Letby was rearrested in June 2019 and bailed for a second time while detectives tried to build the evidence against her.

But in November 2020, more than five years after the death of Baby A, Letby was charged with eight murders and 10 attempted murders. One of the murder charges was later dropped from the indictment.

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE

Father of Murdered Police Officer Warns of Downside of Forcing Killers to Appear for Sentencing

Bryn Hughes says murderers who ‘disrespect’ the law could cause havoc

Chris Summers
August 23, 2023Updated: August 23, 2023

The father of a murdered police officer has warned of the downside of making it mandatory for convicted murderers and rapists to attend their sentencing hearings.

Lucy Letby, who was convicted of murdering seven babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital on Friday, refused to attend her sentencing hearing on Monday.

It was the latest snub to the criminal justice system with the killers of Sabina NessaZara Aleena and Olivia Pratt-Korbel all refusing to attend.

On Tuesday, Justice Secretary Alex Chalk said he would seek to change the law “at the earliest opportunity” to make sure offenders did not shirk appearing at their sentencing hearings.

But Bryndon Hughes, a former prison officer, said the proposed law change was a political “knee-jerk reaction” which had not been thought through.

Epoch Times Photo
Bryndon Hughes—whose daughter PC Nicola Hughes was murdered by Dale Cregan in 2012—shows off his MBE at Buckingham Palace in London on June 13, 2023. (PA)

Mr. Hughes—whose daughter PC Nicola Hughes was killed along with PC Fiona Bone in 2012 when they were lured to a house in Greater Manchester by Dale Cregan who launched a gun and grenade ambush.

Cregan, a Manchester gangster who had also murdered father and son David and Mark Short in separate gun and grenade attacks in the city, was given a whole life sentence in June 2013.

‘Sociopaths … who Feed off Anguish and Grief’

He told the PA news agency: “Most of the time they’re going to be sociopaths and they feed off that anguish and grief. If they can see families in the dock they’re going to shout abuse, they’re going to play up, start fighting and anything else, because they can see that pain and anguish on their faces, I don’t think it’s worth going through all that.”

Mr. Hughes, who was a prison officer for 25 years, said: “I’ve carried people into the dock who are biting, spitting and shouting abuse and within two or three minutes of the judge speaking to deliver a sentence they’ve started again and the judge has just said ‘take them back downstairs.’”

“It disrupts everything, causes more anguish and it delays things, so it’s a really hard choice and they’re not the type of people to just say to them ‘sit down and be quiet,’ they’re beyond that, they’ve got total disregard for life and disrespect for law and order,” he added.

Mr. Hughes, who was given an MBE for services to people affected by crime earlier this year, said mandatory appearances for criminals would not help the families of victims who should instead “take comfort” from the sentences which are meted out.

In recent years sentencing hearings in high-profile cases have been televised and, although the camera focuses on the judge, there would be nothing to stop the convicted man or woman from interrupting the judge and shouting or swearing at his victims’ families, police officers or the judiciary.

Steve Gillan, general secretary of the Prison Officers Association, accused ministers of “politicising the issue” and said, “There is no legislation that can make someone ultimately produced to court, but the judge already has that power to say to a prison governor if they want an individual to attend.”

“What the judge or the court can’t do is make the governor use force to get them there, that would be unlawful,” he added.

Mr. Gillan said: “So it’s left to the prison staff to give a direct order to the prisoner to say ‘we’ve been in touch with the court, we don’t accept your rationale for not coming, you’re now ordered to attend court.’ If they don’t attend court then reasonable and proportional force can be used.”

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, a former director of Public Prosecutions, accused the government of “dragging its heels” over changing the law.

When Koci Selamaj was jailed for life for the murder of Sabina Nessa in April 2022 the judge, Mr. Justice Sweeney, called him a “coward” for failing to attend but said he was powerless to prevent him from staying in his cell.

Then, after Jordan McSweeney refused to turn up for sentencing in February 2023 after murdering Zara Aleena, Mr. Raab promised to change the law and said “spineless” killers would have to appear in court.

Letby refused to show up for her sentencing on Monday and former justice secretary Robert Buckland said her “cynical refusal” to come to court had added insult to the “already heinous injury” for the families of her victims.

Mr. Chalk wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter: “Lucy Letby is not just a murderer but a coward, whose failure to face her victims’ families—refusing to hear their impact statements and society’s condemnation—is the final insult. We are looking to change the law so offenders can be compelled to attend sentencing hearings.”

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said on Monday: “It’s cowardly that people who commit such horrendous crimes do not face their victims and hear first-hand the impact that their crimes have had on them and their families and loved ones. We are looking, and have been, at changing the law to make sure that that happens and that’s something that we’ll bring forward in due course.”

To View the Original Article CLICK HERE

Lucy Letby appeal fund launched

Supporters claim the nurse’s conviction ‘may represent the greatest miscarriage of justice the UK has ever witnessed’

LL 07
Lucy Letby’s legal team have not yet revealed if they plan to appeal CREDIT: Elizabeth Cook/PA Wire

A campaign to fundraise for Lucy Letby’s appeal has claimed the nurse’s conviction “may represent the greatest miscarriage of justice the UK has ever witnessed”.

Letby has the right to appeal against her whole life order for murdering seven babies and trying to kill another six, although successful appeals against this sentence are very rare.

Her legal team has not yet revealed if they plan to appeal, but campaigners who claim she did not have a fair trial are already gathering public support for a project they have named Science on Trial.

The main aim of the campaign, led by Sarrita Adams – a scientific consultant for biotech startups based in California – is “to ensure that scientific evidence is used responsibly in the criminal justice system”.

She is trying to gather a group of scientists, lawyers and activists to help with the convicted murderer’s appeal.

The fundraising page of the Science on Trial website is not currently open to donations, but there is a “coming soon” note on the “donate” button.

“Our first mission is to campaign for a new trial for Lucy Letby, who was recently convicted of murdering infants, under her care at the Countess of Chester Hospital, UK,” the campaign’s website states.

“Lucy Letby’s trial may represent the greatest miscarriage of justice that the UK has ever witnessed. Through fundraising, researching, and legal assistance, we aim to ensure that Lucy Letby can have a fair trial where evidence is reliable. We are currently working to form a group of scientists, lawyers, and activists to aid in the upcoming appeal for Lucy Letby.”

LL 08 Serrita ADAMS 01
Sarrita Adams criticised the medical evidence presented at Letby’s trial

In a lengthy statement, Ms Adams criticises the medical evidence that was presented at the trial.

This includes criticism of how the high insulin levels detected in two of the babies were presented by the prosecution, although Letby did not contest that the babies were deliberately injected with insulin, instead denying it was she who had administered it.

Ms Adams also criticised the decision to allow medical expert Dr Dewi Evans to give evidence relating to the administering of air to other victims, and the quality of his evidence itself. 

Ms Adams describes herself as “a scientist with rare expertise in rare paediatric diseases”.

However, although she has a PhD in biochemistry from Cambridge University, according to her online LinkedIn profile, she appears not to have worked as a scientist subsequently.

She runs a consultancy called Railroad Children which works with under-18-year-olds who have rare diseases and their families to identify novel treatments.

Meanwhile, according to the PubMed database of biomedical research, Ms Adams appears only ever to have contributed to two published pieces of research, the last in 2013 related to autism.

To View the Original Article CLICK HERE

I note with interest that subsequent to my voicing concerns, even may I say doubt of the validity of the Guilty claims in this case, where Lucy Letby has been not only sentenced to 7 whole-life terms in prison but to the danger of living out her life vilified as a serial killer of sick and very premature babies, surrounded by criminals with a culture of seeking notoriety or glory, pleasure or popularity by killing and or attacking child abusers!

Lucy Letby has been dubbed the most prolific killer of children in Britain – no one seems to have the integrity to add the caveat of either perceived or believed but leap to the assumption of FACT, when there may well be others far worse but not as yet caught – how about consideration of the many 100s of children who have been killed whilst in the care of The Catholic Church and we have little idea how many children seized by the State and deported to Australia for fostering or adoption subsequently were killed.

When considering how many small children were killed clearly, even if guilty, Lucy Letby has a long way to go to have been the most prolific, when you consider that in 2019 alone the British State sanctioned the abortion of 220,000+ babies!

The Meeja should beware of publishing superlatives even negative superlatives!

Not to mention Dr. Dewi Evans’ contribution seems very suspect!

Shocker: Is Key ‘Expert Witness’ In UK Nurse Baby Killings Trial Exposed?

Written by John O’Sullivan

Having personal experience of how science is used and abused in courtroom battles the recent sensational conviction of nurse Lucy Letby as modern Britain’s worst serial child killer is troubling. Did the science presented fairly reflect the facts or was an innocent women cruelly jailed for life?

Death of a newborn is expecially devastating when a criminal court rules that your precious baby was intentionally harmed at its most vulnerable and in the most trusted of hands.

This month Lucy Letby became the most prolific serial killer of children in modern British history when convicted of the murders of at least seven infants. At least six other babies sustained injuries when she was working as a neonatal nurse between June 2015 and June 2016 at the Countess of Chester Hospital (CoCH) in Chester, England.

But in the period June 2015 to June 2016 nobody suspected Lucy Letby of wrong-doing.  It was only after the Consultants, running the neonatal unit, were the subject of a critical report from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) that the Consultants filed a report with the police alleging the infant deaths were due to the actions of nurse Lucy Letby.

Having studied independent reports on the case it became clear that this case was far more uncertain and problematic than the media have reported and it has spurned unease among many experts that the science presented to the jury was not only sub par, but may be tainted by confirmation bias.

In all but one case, the infants received autopsies, and the coroner found that they died of natural causes.

According to one independent expert source:

“Based upon published peer-reviewed research, and with the guidance, advice, and insights of other scientists, it is the view of Science on Trial that the scientific information put before the court by the expert witnesses is very simply inaccurate, misleading, and in many places false. The expert witnesses in this case are likely aware that the claims they have made lack necessary scientific findings, and if they were to write these claims up and attempt to submit them for publication, their submission would be quickly rejected.”

While another independent analyst revealed that:

“A former paediatrician sometimes called ‘Doctor Evidence For Hire’ is the prosecution’s linchpin ‘expert witness’. Retired since 2009, evidence shows that rather than as Dr Dewi Evans led under oath regarding the National Crime Agency contacting him to assist on the case – Dr Evans had insinuated himself into the case early on by contacting the police first and offering his services.

He testified that he thought he ‘could help’, ‘give advice’, ‘review case notes’ and ‘form an opinion of what led to the collapses of Child A and Child B’. Evans became involved in the Letby case when he travelled from Wales to Cheshire to ‘visit’ Cheshire police because, he said, there were concerns regarding the number of deaths at CoCH which were ‘unusual’ and which exceeded expectations. Defence counsel and no doubt many others saw this as ‘touting for business’. “

It appears Dr Dewi Evans profited handsomely from his craft. His company called Dewi Evans Paediatric Consulting Limited is listed on LinkedIn selling his services as an expert witness for hire. His company reports current accounts with cash at hand of over £108,000 for the financial year ending 2022. He appears to have invoiced totals between £80,000-150,000 annually during the period of the Lucy Letby investigation.

Critics of his assert that his testimony tended more towards the role of being an apologist for the doctors who were present at CoCH at the time, rather than presenting the confident and independent judgement of an expert.

In previous trial work the Lord Justice of Appeals had rejected Dr Dewi Evans’ evidence, describing it as “tendentious and partisan expressions of opinion that are outside of Dr Evans’ professional competence which had “no place in a reputable expert report.

From the outset, this case proceeded by pure scientific speculation, where it introduced employees of the same organization that employs the defendant (The National Health Service) to testify to the validity of the forensic investigation performed by an expert who solicited the role as an investigator (Dr Evans).

There were several instances where it could be argued that strict application of the scientific method was not only missing, but cock-eyed guess work predominated, as indicated in the following independent analysis: 

“…it is incredible that all of the claims against Lucy Letby rely on the half-baked assertions of Dr Evans regarding air emboli being the only cause that explains what happened to several of these neonates. Assertions that yet again may very well be outside his expertise.

The bulk of Dr Evans’ initial evidence in chief included taking the jury through a collection of medical training videos and explaining key terms and procedures. Among others, this included a training video on the Phillips neonatal patient monitors. During cross examination he undermined his own ‘expert evidence’ first by telling the jury that not everything could be learned from training videos, and then by admitting he had not only never used in clinical practice the Phillips monitors he had been taking them through – but that he had actually never seen one at all.”

It can be shown that Dr Evans provided no real suggestion in his testimony for Child A that any alternate potential theories for the cause of death were considered and discounted. In fact, he describes that he came to his conclusion (the air embolus) first, and then found he could even fit the circumstances of Child B to it.

This gave the impression that some degree of confirmation bias was inherent in his thinking. The impression of confirmation bias became stronger when Dr Evans rapidly and with little consideration concluded new evidence solely reinforced his theory of the case, such as the claimed skin mottling Registrar Harkness described seeing on Child A for the first time while giving evidence during this very trial.

lawhealthandtech.substack.com tells us:

“Another example came when, after it had been put to him during cross examination, he unequivocally denied that an infection could even be involved. He brushed infection aside with the bold claim that evidence of infection “would appear on a post-mortem examination”.

However, this is not always the case. Unless there was some obvious outward sign of infection, clinical observations at death that strongly suggested it, or the post-mortem request suggested it, the pathologist might not undertake the complete panel of tests that identify a broad range of viral and bacterial infections. “

Science On Trial, How Does It Stack Up?

Essentially, the scientific “proof” in this case amounts to the conflation of gas embolism with air embolism, and the reliance on one single publication from 1989, which details the consequences of gas embolism. However, this is not the same phenomenon that Dr Evans uses in his assessment of cause of death.

Dr Evans contends that these infants, with wildly different autopsy findings, died due to air embolism and not gas embolism. The evidence Dr Evans relies on to prove air embolism is from a paper detailing a wholly distinct phenomena called gas embolism. This alone demonstrates how woefully out of his depth Dr Evans was in conducting his investigation.

The case against Lucy Letby was wholly circumstantial such that expert medical evidence required to convict her for a full life term should be of the most impeccable standard. But was it?

It has been repeatedly claimed that the number of deaths at CoCH increased in 2015 and 2016, and the implication was that these two years were unique in the number of infant deaths.

However, the original announcement made regarding the investigation, of the infant deaths at the Countess of Chester Hospital, contained no statement surrounding an increased incidence of deaths. In the years subsequent to 2015 and 2016 the rates of perinatal death continued to increase.

  • DCS Nigel Wenham stated on or around May 18th 2017 that: “Cheshire constabulary has launched an investigation, which will focus on the deaths of eight babies that occurred between that period [2015-2016] where medical practitioners have expressed concern”
  • The cumulative infant mortality rate at the Countess of Chester Hospital, for 2015 and 2016 was lower than the national average.
  • There is an unusual trend in the pattern of stillbirths and perinatal deaths.
  • The number of perinatal deaths in 2017 and 2018 was higher than in 2015 and 2016, but Lucy Letby was not on the ward in these years
  • In June 2019, Dr Gibbs retired.  Dr Gibbs was the Senior Consultant who accused Lucy Letby of murdering infants.  In that same year the number of perinatal deaths and stillbirths dramatically declined.

Principia Scientific is collaborating with interested third parties to impartially review all the scientific evidence to assist in resolving uncertaintities and we will post updates in due course.

References:

https://www.scienceontrial.com/

https://rexvlucyletby2023.com/

About John O’Sullivan:  John is CEO and co-founder of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John co-hosts TNT Radio’s Sky Dragon Slaying show with fellow PSI co-founders, Joe Olson and Joe Postma. He is a seasoned science writer and adept legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the multi-million-dollar ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume ‘Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory’ debunking alarmist lies about carbon dioxide plus their follow-up climate book. His latest publication, ‘Slaying the Virus and Vaccine Dragon’ exposes dangerous mainstream medical group think and junk science.

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
&

ControversiallyGreg@Gmail.com
& follow me on
TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW
&
https://twitter.com/Controv44553741
& on
PARLER:
https://parler.com/GregLW

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual.
NB:
Please Note that to aid clarity:
All material published in Blue Script
is either a URL Link
OR
Republished having been written by
Someone else, who I do try to identify for you
& where possible indicate a Link to the original.
.

Please Be Sure To
Follow me on some other sites
 & spread the facts World Wide

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

Greg Lance – Watkins
GregLW            GL-W
GLW Documents

Climate Change
of Wales & the Welsh
MY PODCASTS
My Health Blog – Cancer etc.
WEF, Agenda 21&30, NWO, UN etc.
&
To SEE Many More

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Regarding TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW

From 04-Jul-2022 until Early December 2022:
I was banned from TWITTER.
Allegedly I have broken a TWITTER Rule,
But, Seemingly they lacked the integrity or competence
to identify the rule!
PRESUMABLY I told the Truth or Used a fact
that does not suit their corrupt WOKE agenda,
bias or propaganda!
As the corrupt & biased owners no longer use their lies,
bias & propaganda on Twitter to Un-platform People
& it is no longer owned & managed by them
as Elon Musk has purchased the platform:
I have rejoined by deleting my provably accurate
Tweet:
TWITTER BAN 04-July-2022
Remove Tweet
Tweet 1 of 1
Violating one of our Rules.
Greg_Lance-Watkins
@Greg_LW
They sexualise children as young as 5 at school. But #Prince_Andrew paid £12M for NOT having intercourse with a minor &amp; #Ghislaine got 20yrs. but not a single #Epstein client has been charged, let alone prosecuted! https://t.co/ckGbEMFxVf
Jul 4, 2022, 12:00 PM
By clicking Remove, you are removing the content of your Tweet and all other edited versions of the tweet, and forgoing the option to appeal this violation. Please note that the original content will be replaced with a notice stating your Tweet is no longer available because it violated the Twitter Rules. This notice will be accessible via direct URL and via your profile timeline for 14 days. Learn more.
If you feel that your account has been locked in error, you can appeal by contacting our support team here.

PLEASE NOTE:
Every part of the Tweet is a provable FACT,
the truth seems not to have been popular –
Let us hope Elon Musk’s ownership will lead to greater integrity on Twitter!

TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW
&
https://twitter.com/Controv44553741

PARLER:
https://parler.com/GregLW

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
PLEASE ACCEPT MY APOLOGY: 
For any adverts that may follow this,
in text or at the end
which may well be inappropriate
or even offensive.
I regret we have no control over adverts
or their number, which may be displayed!
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~