BREXIT Last Shortlist & The Way Forward
based on having read Dr. Richard North’s BREXIT submission in full some time ago I felt it was by far the most likely paper to win the BREXIT Prize.
It was detailed, factual and remarkably well researched with literally 100s of sourced documents collated to make a very comprehensive and well informed submission.
That , as Richard announced on his blog which I have featured below, he has not been shortlisted in the final six leaves me with two different thoughts, the first of which is that I am really looking forward to reading those last six submissions and particularly the winner as their submissions must be incredibly inovative and hugely grounded in both law, politics and even the un sccience of economics to have surpased Richard’s submission.
My second reaction, which sadly I fear will prove right, is that Richard’s detailed and inovative submission has far outclassed the other submissions and has proved embarrassing to some of the judges in that it proved challenging to understand in its comprehensive handling and very detailed understanding of not just the EU but the new world of global politics and power. Further that there is a strong possibility that Richard’s submission slaughters the holy cows of misunderstanding of the facts held by some amongst the judges.
I can but hope my fears are not realised and the winner has presented an inovative, practical and informed solution to the challenges posed by the brief of the prize intentions.
I look forward with some concern to 08-Apr-2014 and the results but though my knowledge of all of the judges is limited there are some very large loopholes in the impartiality of the judges – not least that Roger Bootle has recently written and published his own solution to the problems which on just one reading seemed to miss all too many points making it largely unworkable and clearly being so absorbed by economics had little relevance to the realities of disassociation from the EU for these United Kingdoms.
The clash of the views of the judges may well have tainted the validity of their decision making process – unlike Richard I shall await the results with baited breath!
Wednesday 26 March 2014
As indicated in my overnight piece, our “Brexit” submission did not make it to the final six. Instead, I got a bland, patronising note from the IEA press person (above), a classic example of rank bad manners. Given the effort all of us put into the competition, at the very least we should have been sent a personal e-mail from the chairman of the judging panel.
Although I could have used the money, not to be included is actually a relief. It frees me from the constraints of the competition and allows me to return to the debate. With that in mind, I am able to publish my submission here (.pdf 98 pages), and will work up some shorter essays for the blog, based on the content. We are also planning a dedicated website, to explore the wider issues involved.
In terms of the content, I feel my single, most important contribution is the observation that “Brexit” is not a single event, but a process. It must be a series of ongoing strategies which allow for a FLexible response and Continuous development. Thus “Brexit” became “FLexCit”.
The IEA has now issued a press release nominating the six finalists, and the award ceremony will be held on 8 April in London.
Richard North 26/03/2014
Here are details of The IEA’s BREXIT Prize as it moves forward:
The Institute of Economic Affairs is delighted to announce the final six candidates for the IEA Brexit Prize. The Rt Hon Lord Lawson will be awarding the €100,000 prize to the winning entry outlining a blueprint for Britain after the EU on 8 April.
Cash prizes will be awarded to the first, second and third best entries, as judged by the competition’s final judging panel. First prize is €100,000, second prize is €10,000 and third prize is €5,000. There will be a special prize of €5,000 for the best entry from an individual aged 30 or under. The winning entries will be published by the IEA. Judges-decisions are final.
· Rory Broomfield and Iain Murray
· Prof Stephen Bush
· Ben Clements
· Tim Hewish
· Iain Mansfield
· Daniel Pycock
Commenting on the release of the final shortlist, Mark Littlewood, Director General at the Institute of Economic Affairs, said:
“The Brexit prize is an essential and timely contribution as we sit at a crossroads regarding our future relationship with both the EU and the rest of the world. Rather than focusing on the pluses and minuses of membership, we urgently need to address how the UK should arrange its affairs if a referendum triggered a Brexit. These final six entries will be key in providing the much needed intellectual backdrop for this.”
· Nigel Lawson (Chairman), The Rt Hon Lord Lawson of Blaby, former Chancellor of the Exchequer
· David Starkey, British constitutional historian and a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of London
· Prof. Philip Booth (Facilitator), Institute of Economic Affairs and Cass Business School
· Roger Bootle, founder of Capital Economics, a Specialist Adviser to the House of Commons Treasury Committee and an Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Actuaries. (Advisor and non-voting member)
· Tim Frost, a governor of the LSE and director of Markit and Cairn Capital
· Gisela Stuart, MP for Birmingham Edgbaston and editor of The House Magazine
· Prof. Martin Ricketts, Professor of Economic Organisation at the University of Buckingham
· Dr. Stephen Davies, Institute of Economic Affairs
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337 –
number witheld calls are blocked & calls are recorded.
DO MAKE USE of LINKS, >SEARCH< & >Side Bars< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’ archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings