London 2012 – The Unfriendly Games!.
“In politics, stupidity is not a handicap.”
Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821)
with its pandering to official JUNK FOOD suppliers, carbonated sugar drink suppliers and a host of seemingly inappropriate sponsors The Olympic spirit would seem to be founded on vested interests and obesity – there is nothing more cynical than grossly overtweight slobs in Olympic tracksuits or branded Tshirts stretched to capacity ‘chilled out’ stuffing their faces at home on the couch watching the olympic games and expressing their interest in sport every time they see a fit young body displayed in a VERY gender specific style!
Funny isn’t it that you can be prosecuted for gender specific advertising in employment yet only men can be represented in strictly differentiated sports as with women!
There seems to have been very little said about men’s beach volley ball and yet women run around in circles in competition and for the cover they wear might as well be naked!
I do admit that having absolutely no interest in voyeurism nor interest in sport other than when I was young enough and fit enough to actively compete I have not watched a single solitary event and clicking in and out of the opening ceremony during ads on the program I chose to watch I did not feel a single time to overstay the ads.
It still seems to be a gross waste of money for which we will still be paying in many years time. I read that it has been a complete business stopper for genuine businesses based on tourism particularly and only those with an in on the scams are being enriched – all from the public purse!
What legacy – Oh the debrt, the upkeep, the empty stadia, the council, teacher, politician, corporate freebie scroungers and not much else and of course many bankruptcies some self imnterested and others due to unfair competition!
Not a legacy to be proud of and that is for sure.
Draconian ‘Wi-Fi police’ stalk Olympic Games
- August 3, 2012
All unauthorised Wi-Fi networks including smartphone hotspots are banned from Olympic venues. Photo: Sadao Turner Esq
You’ve probably heard of the overzealous Olympic Games “brand police” harassing old ladies making Olympic cakes and other shop owners getting into the Olympic spirit, but how about the “Wi-Fi police”?
The Olympics brand is the second most valuable brand in the world at $US45 billion.
Sponsors pay tens of millions of pounds to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) for exclusive rights to spruik their wares around London and beyond, and the IOC will stop at nothing to protect those revenue streams.
BT is the “official communications services provider” for the Olympics and has 1500 Wi-Fi hotspots at Olympic sites, with prices starting from £5.99 for 90 minutes. It’s the largest single Wi-Fi venue installation in Britain, according to BT.
To protect this lucrative deal – and presumably minimise any potential technical interference – LOCOG, the London Olympics organising committee, has banned “personal/private wireless access points and 3G hubs” from Olympic venues.
Want to create a wireless hotspot on your smartphone so you can get online on your laptop or tablet in between matches? That’s prohibited, as are portable Wi-Fi hotspot devices.
Sadao Turner Esq, director of new media for TV personality Ryan Seacrest’s production company, tweeted a photo of the “Olympics Wi-Fi police” that are charged with seeking out unauthorised Wi-Fi hotspots with big red detectors.
The absurdities don’t end there. According to Britain’s Daily Telegraph, Fish and chip stalls have been advised they are not allowed to serve chips on their own without fish as McDonald’s is the official chip maker of the Games. The Independent reported that the ban on chips extended to 800 retailers at the 40 Olympic venues.
Hundreds of uniformed Olympics officers have been patrolling London enforcing the multimillion-dollar marketing deals signed with companies such as Visa, Proctor & Gamble, Coca-Cola, Adidas, McDonald’s and BP.
Only official sponsors who have paid a certain amount of money are permitted to use Olympic Games trademarks in their advertising.
Under laws specifically passed for the London Games, the brand army has rights to enter shops and business premises and bring courts actions and fines up to £20,000.
Words such as “Olympic”, “gold”, “silver”, “bronze”, “sponsors”, “summer” and “London” have been banned from business advertisements so as not to give the impression they are connected to the Olympics. Even pubs can’t have signs displaying brands of beer that are not official sponsors.
LOCOG has previously said that the sponsor rights were acquired by companies for millions of pounds and this helped support the staging of the games. It said people who sought the same benefits for free by “engaging in ambush marketing or producing counterfeit goods” were effectively depriving the games of revenue.
From a public relations perspective, this hasn’t played well with Londoners, who could breach the legislation simply by getting into the spirit of the games. Residents have also missed out on tickets only to see rows of empty seats in sections reserved for sponsors.
Today they are reading rumours that just 15 Games organisers spent $70,000 on lunch.
To see why Olympics organisers go to such lengths to protect sponsors you only have to follow the money. The Olympics brand is the second most valuable brand in the world at $US45 billion, according to a study by consultants Brand Finance.
Apple is the only brand ahead of it, worth $US70 billion. Both maintain this value by going after anyone they perceive to be using their trademarks.
The Olympics brand has increased in value by 87 per cent since the Beijing Games, largely off the back of a rise in broadcast rights – deals which punters complain are also preventing them from fully enjoying the Games. Ticketholders have also been told not to post photos or videos of matches to social networking sites.
Matthew Gain, digital director of public relations agency Edelman, said there was a “fine line that needs to be tread” between the commercial realities and the ability of consumers to enjoy the Games.
The Olympics are expensive to run and sponsors provide a chunk of the cash, so they expect that competitors won’t be able to get the same or similar benefits for free.
“However at the same time you don’t want to protect that investment so much that you piss off everyone,” he said.
“You’ve got to keep sensible about it and you’ve got to remember that the moment that you as a brand by protecting your own brand start inhibiting consumer choice and consumer behaviour … then that’s when you start risking impacting and affecting your brand.”
So have organisers gone too far in this instance? “Some of the protection of the stuff in the UK where you’ve seen the local cake shop being told that they need to stop displaying the Olympic rings cake that they’ve made and put in the window is perhaps a little bit too far,” said Gain.
“I think if it’s a mum and dad business that’s not really benefiting from the Olympics but getting into the Olympic spirit … that’s probably where you’ve gone a little bit too far.”
To view the original article CLICK HERE.
for all my contact details & Blogs: CLICK HERE
British Politicians with pens and treachery, in pursuit of their own agenda and greed, have done more damage to the liberty, freedoms, rights and democracy of the British peoples than any army in over 1,000 years.
The disastrous effects of British politicians selling Britain into the thrall of foreign rule by the EU for their own personal rewards has damaged the well-being of Britain more than the armies of Hitler and the Franco – German – Italian axis of 1939 – 1945.
Make your vote count:
INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
I am tending to move my more active blogs to my own web sites from Google’s Blogger since their arbitrary and unannounced change from being .blogspot.com to being .blogspot.co.UK and their policy of removing factual ionformation if it happens to offend Political Correctness or political ambitions even complaints that people being offended by facts already in the public domain!