The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

Lawyer ‘Dies Suddenly’ After Signing Affidavit About Covid Vax ‘Bioweapon’

Written by Lioness of Judah Ministry on April 16, 2026. Posted in Current News

The covid vaccine is a bioweapon and its architects are suspected of crimes against humanity, it was alleged during a court case in the Netherlands this month

The professor who drafted the current Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act also described the jab given to billions as ‘the product of illegal gain-of-function research’.

The allegations by Professor Francis Boyle (pictured) were heard during a civil case being heard at the District Court of Leeuwarden, north Netherlands.

Professor Boyle, formerly of the University of Illinois College of Law, is known for his work in human rights, biosecurity law, and international legal advocacy.

He ‘died suddenly’ aged 74 in January 2025 after swearing the affidavit that made the claims.

The cause of his death has not been released.

High-profile defendants include Bill Gates, founder of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, the Gates Foundation, and Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla.

Professor Boyle’s affidavit was read out by witness, psychotherapist and legal activist Dr Joseph Sansone, an adjunct professor, from Florida. It is paraphrased below to make it easier to understand but here is a link to the full transcript containing other witness statements.

Paraphrased, the affidavit said:

My conclusions are based on my expertise in bioweapons law.

In my view, the COVID-19 mRNA injections qualify as a biological weapon. I reached this conclusion based on their components and how they were developed.

The core of my argument is that these injections involve derivatives of gain-of-function research – that is, research in which viruses are modified to increase their ability to infect or affect humans.

By definition, a biological weapon consists of two parts:

1. A harmful agent (the payload)
2. A delivery system

I argue that both elements are present here.

First, the payload. Research published in the scientific journal Nature in 2015 examined bat coronaviruses and explored their potential to infect humans. In that work, a virus was synthetically created and shown to replicate effectively in laboratory and animal settings.

This demonstrates the development of a SARS-like virus with characteristics enabling human infection.

In that publication, researchers state that they developed an infectious recombinant virus and demonstrated strong replication both in vitro and in vivo. In simple terms, this means a SARS-like coronavirus was created with features that allow it to infect human cells.

The researchers involved were affiliated with institutions including the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

From my perspective, this represents gain-of-function research and contributes to what I consider the pathogenic component. I therefore view the spike protein not as purely natural, but as the result of synthetic development optimised for human infection.

Second, the delivery system. The mRNA in the injections instructs human cells to produce this spike protein, forming a key part of the biological effect.

The delivery mechanism is lipid nanoparticles – small particles that encapsulate the mRNA and allow it to enter human cells. I describe this as a nanotechnology-based delivery platform.

In my view, this technology was developed, funded, and advanced through US defence-related research programmes, including work associated with the Pentagon and DARPA.

[DARPA – Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency – is the research and development arm of the US Department of Defense.]

I also note that the virus itself was aerosolised and processed using nanotechnology from early stages, which I interpret as part of a longer-term effort to develop advanced delivery systems.

Taken together, I conclude that the combination of the pathogenic element (the spike protein) and the delivery system (lipid nanoparticles) constitute what I define as a biological weapons system.

Based on this interpretation, I argue that there are legal implications under international law. In particular, I state that individuals such as Bill Gates and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla may qualify as suspects of crimes against humanity, as defined under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

The case was initiated in 2023 by seven vaccine-injured plaintiffs, one who has since died. Accused with Gates and Bourla are Mark Rutte, former Dutch prime minister, now Secretary General of NATO, and former Dutch health minister Hugo de Jonge.

Governmental and commercial organisations are accused too. They are Pfizer Inc, the State of the Netherlands, and the Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM), the Dutch national institute for public health.

They face five main charges including deception and misinformation, specifically ‘deliberate misinformation and concealment of risks that led citizens to receive harmful injections under false pretences’.

The lawyer bringing the case, Peter Stassen, said that the ‘safe and effective’ message was not appropriate for the plaintiffs who claim the jabs caused them serious physical and mental injury.

It is stressed that all involved in the production of the covid vaccines must have known, or should have known, that the vaccines could potentially cause severe side effects.

Another charge is complicity in bodily harm: the claimants had no health issues before being coerced into taking the covid jabs and allege the vaccine caused them chronic physical and psychological injuries.

The defendants are also accused of abuse of power and of coercion, citing coercive tactics like ‘no jab, no job’ mandates, social pressure, and general exclusion from daily life as tools to override vaccine hesitancy.

The prosecution says these tactics amount to violations of human rights and of bodily autonomy.

Peter Stassen, who specialises in European competition law, and Arno van Kessel are the Dutch lawyers prosecuting the case, which took a dramatic turn after van Kessel was arrested in June 2025 by armed police.

He was reportedly blindfolded before being taken to a high-security prison where he has since been held without charge, accused of belonging to a ‘criminal network’.

This prevented him attending an important hearing on July 9 that discussed jurisdiction, the merits of the case and whether the plaintiffs’ witnesses should be allowed to give evidence.

Unconfirmed reports say he has spent 260 days, almost nine months, in custody.

No official charges have been brought against him.

See more here substack.com

Header image: Public i Contact

Some bold emphasis added

FOR THE ORIGINAL SEE: https://principia-scientific.com/lawyer-dies-suddenly-after-signing-affidavit-about-covid-vax-bioweapon/

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

Greg Lance – Watkins
GregLW            GL-W
GLW Documents

Climate Change
of Wales & the Welsh
MY PODCASTS
My Health Blog – Cancer etc.
WEF, Agenda 21&30, NWO, UN etc.
&
To SEE Many More

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Regarding TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW

From 04-Jul-2022 until Early December 2022:
I was banned from TWITTER.
Allegedly I have broken a TWITTER Rule,
But, Seemingly they lacked the integrity or competence
to identify the rule!
PRESUMABLY I told the Truth or Used a fact
that did not suit their corrupt WOKE agenda,
bias or propaganda! AT THE TIME!

As the corrupt & biased owners no longer use their lies,
bias & propaganda on Twitter to Un-platform People
& it is no longer owned & managed by them
as Elon Musk has purchased the platform:
I have rejoined by deleting
my provably accurate
Tweet:
TWITTER BAN 04-July-2022

Remove Tweet

Tweet 1 of 1

Violating one of our Rules.

Greg_Lance-Watkins
@Greg_LW

They sexualise children as young as 5 at school. But #Prince_Andrew paid £12M for NOT having intercourse with a minor &; #Ghislaine got 20yrs. but not a single #Epstein client has been charged, let alone prosecuted! https://t.co/ckGbEMFxVf

Jul 4, 2022, 12:00 PM

By clicking Remove, you are removing the content of your Tweet and all other edited versions of the tweet, and forgoing the option to appeal this violation. Please note that the original content will be replaced with a notice stating your Tweet is no longer available because it violated the Twitter Rules. This notice will be accessible via direct URL and via your profile timeline for 14 days. Learn more.

If you feel that your account has been locked in error, you can appeal by contacting our support team here.

PLEASE NOTE:
Every part of the Tweet is a provable FACT,
the truth seems not to have been popular –
Let us hope Elon Musk’s ownership will lead to greater integrity on Twitter!

DO BEWARE of AI :
A Friend Recently entered my name in an AI Search Engine:
Apparently Greg Lance-Watkins
Was recently found guilty of a double homicide
in Tennessee, USA.
I was last in America in December 1979,
I am not, nor have I ever been in Court
or prison in America!