Hi,

you may remember I proclaimed some grave doubts, on this web site, of the safety of the guilty verdict of murder, in regard to the young neo natal nurse Lucy Letby.

It seems I was not alone and the case has been taken up by Rachel Aviv in a 13,000 word article in The New Yorker magazine which you note has been blocked on the internet in Britain by the UK authorities. The very fact that it is blocked merely adds to my suspicions!

Especially when one realises that even in the British hard copy of the magazine, the article is/was published in full.

1. www.newyorker.com › magazine › 2024/05/20A British Nurse Was Found Guilty of Killing Seven Babies. Did …

   5 days ago · Colleagues reportedly called Lucy Letby an “angel of death,” and the Prime Minister condemned her, Rachel Aviv writes. But, in the rush to judgment, serious questions about the evidence were …

2. Top stories

   • 

     Why a New Yorker Story on a Notorious Murder Case Is Blocked in Britain

     The article challenges the evidence used to convict Lucy Letby, a neonatal nurse, of multiple murders last year, and has led to a debate about England’s …

     New York Times

     1 day ago

   • 

     New Yorker Story Questions Guilt Of Nurse Convicted Of Killing 7 Babies

     British authorities may have ignored evidence in a rush to convict a neonatal nurse of killing seven babies, according to a sweeping investigation published Monday in The New Yorker.

     HuffPost via Yahoo

     3 days ago

   View all

3. www.niemanlab.org › 2024 › 05“Impossible to approach the reporting the way I normally …

   2 days ago · Before reading Rachel Aviv’s most recent piece for The New Yorker, I might have described the Lucy Letby case as well-covered.. In August 2023, the former neonatal nurse became only the fourth woman in U.K. history to receive a whole-life prison sentence, after being convicted of killing seven babies and attempting to kill another six.

4. People also ask

   Who is Lucy letby?

   Did British authorities ignore evidence in a rush to convict Lucy letby?Why was ‘letby’ investigated?

   Was letby a good person?

   www.nytimes.com › 2024/05/16 › worldWhy a New Yorker Story on a Notorious Murder Case Is Blocked …

   2 days ago · The article, by the staff writer Rachel Aviv, poses substantial questions about the evidence relied on in court. And it raises the possibility that Ms. Letby, vilified in the media after her …

   www.washingtonpost.com › style › mediaNew Yorker geo-blocks Lucy Letby story in collision with …

   1 day ago · New Yorker writer Rachel Aviv’s story addressed how these reporting restrictions have affected coverage of the Letby case. It detailed how a professor writing about the case online last summer …

   www.facebook.com › newyorker › postsThe New Yorker – Last August, Lucy Letby, a 33-year-old…

   3 days ago · Last August, Lucy Letby, a 33-year-old British nurse, was convicted of killing seven newborn babies and attempting to kill six others. Her murder trial, one of the longest in English history, captivated the United Kingdom. The collective acceptance of her guilt was absolute. “She has thrown open the door to Hell,” the Daily Mail wrote …

   www.huffpost.com › entry › nurse-baby-murders-newNew Yorker Questions Guilt Of Nurse Convicted Of Killing …

   2 days ago · British authorities may have ignored evidence in a rush to convict a neonatal nurse of killing seven babies, according to a sweeping investigation published Monday in The New Yorker. Lucy Letby, 34, was found guilty in those killings and in attempts to kill six other babies while she worked at a hospital in northwest England in 2015 and 2016 …

   unherd.com › newsroom › new-yorker-publishes-articleNew Yorker publishes article challenging Lucy Letby verdict

   5 days ago · The New Yorker has today published a 13,000-word article challenging the verdict against Lucy Letby, the nurse who last year was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of …

   Regards,

   Greg_L-W.

   ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

   Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

Greg Lance – Watkins
GregLW            GL-W
GLW Documents

Climate Change
of Wales & the Welsh
MY PODCASTS
My Health Blog – Cancer etc.
WEF, Agenda 21&30, NWO, UN etc.
&
To SEE Many More

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Regarding TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW

From 04-Jul-2022 until Early December 2022:
I was banned from TWITTER.
Allegedly I have broken a TWITTER Rule,
But, Seemingly they lacked the integrity or competence
to identify the rule!
PRESUMABLY I told the Truth or Used a fact
that does not suit their corrupt WOKE agenda,
bias or propaganda!

As the corrupt & biased owners no longer use their lies,
bias & propaganda on Twitter to Un-platform People
& it is no longer owned & managed by them
as Elon Musk has purchased the platform:
I have rejoined by deleting my provably accurate
Tweet:
TWITTER BAN 04-July-2022

Remove Tweet

Tweet 1 of 1

Violating one of our Rules.

Greg_Lance-Watkins
@Greg_LW

They sexualise children as young as 5 at school. But #Prince_Andrew paid £12M for NOT having intercourse with a minor & #Ghislaine got 20yrs. but not a single #Epstein client has been charged, let alone prosecuted! https://t.co/ckGbEMFxVf

Jul 4, 2022, 12:00 PM

By clicking Remove, you are removing the content of your Tweet and all other edited versions of the tweet, and forgoing the option to appeal this violation. Please note that the original content will be replaced with a notice stating your Tweet is no longer available because it violated the Twitter Rules. This notice will be accessible via direct URL and via your profile timeline for 14 days. Learn more.

If you feel that your account has been locked in error, you can appeal by contacting our support team here.

PLEASE NOTE:
Every part of the Tweet is a provable FACT,
the truth seems not to have been popular –
Let us hope Elon Musk’s ownership will lead to greater integrity on Twitter!