The Slippery Statistics of Alex Salmond Selling Scotland out!
.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins – Greg_L-W.

.
Hi,

As you read this consider how it is rigged to suit the propaganda.

Just think how different the result would be if the National Debt was apportioned based on area and the oil revenue based on population.

That would completely reverse the figures and leave Scotland hugely worse off!

Is Alex Salmond cooking the books with VERY selective data to dupe the gullible in Scotland?

Independent Scotland Could be
£148bn Better Off, Claims Report

By Michael Klimes | January 21, 2014 16:29 PM GMT

Alex Salmond

A think tank argues that Scotland would have £148bn by now if it had achieved independence in 1980

Scotland would be £148bn better off had it een independent since 1980, by assuming its share of national debt as well as North Sea oil revenues, according to a report by a left-leaning think tank.

“A very surprising feature of the referendum debate so far has been the way in which the question of the sharing of UK national debt has been handled,” noted the report by economists Jim and Margaret Cuthbert of the Jimmy Reid Foundation.

The reports examined the way Scotland’s economy could have developed and the surplus that the country would have accumulated “if it had taken over a population share of UK debt in 1980, and since then had experienced the same public expenditure  and tax revenues (including a geographic share of North Sea Oil revenues)”

According to calculations by the Scottish government’s Fiscal Commission and Gordon McIntyre-Kemp, an economist turned businessman and pro-independence campaigner, an independent Scotland’s surplus would be “of the order of £100bn or so”.

The report’s authors come to the astonishing £148bn (€180bn, $243.8bn) figure based on Scotland assuming its share on Britain’s national debt as a share of its population. 

From 1982 this putative surplus would have begun to accrue and could have been used to pay off interest payments on Scotland’s actual share of UK debt.

In addition, Scotland’s surplus could have been invested in a sovereign wealth fund worth over £100bn at current prices, resulting in zero public sector debt in Scotland.

Implications for Scottish Independence and Debt

The authors of the report also stated that any calculation of Scotland’s future debt should not be based on the headline UK debt figure of £1,189bn, that has been pushed upwards by quantitative easing by the Bank of England.

Instead, the BoE should use a smaller figure of £814bn that does not include the £375bn that has been added by quantitative easing.

That £375bn represents 31.5% of total public sector debt as of February 2013, according to the BoE.

The Scottish people should not be liable for any of this debt if Scotland votes for independence in the September referendum; calculating Scotland’s debt based on either a split of population or a historic share of the UK’s deficit is wrong, the report stated.

The authors of the report invoke tenets of international law to demarcate these calculations.

“Negotiations should be informed by the Vienna Convention principle that the way in which relevant assets are transferred should influence any partitioning of debt. So, in particular, it is relevant that Scotland should not be taking on debt in relation to assets like Trident,” the report said.

To view the original CLICK HERE

Just why is Alex Salmond trying to rip off the Scots and for whose benefit because it clearly isn’t in the interest of the Scots at large, nor the English, the peoples of Britain or these United Kingdoms – based on ANY reasoned logic, facts or figures.

Without huge subsidy from somebody Scotland would find it was unable to compete with Britain industrially or on an open market – just what industries would remain in Scotland as a small uneconomic region on its own.

Just what is Scotland going to use for income when you consider the huge miles of road and rail to maintain relative to the small population, just how will their Hospital and medical services function when they are no longer a part of the British NHS; with over 60% of its population living within 20 miles of the center of Glasgow or Edinburgh how will it be able to fund the rural areas and islands.

Don’t just say oil because even with 100% of that income it would be inadequate! Do not forget we have all seen the crass and incompe4tent level of Scottish banking having had to bail out the unarguably incompetent RBS – perhaps it is worth remembering just how profitable is one of its two main football teams – need one go on?.

Regards,

Greg_L-W.
.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337 –
number witheld calls are blocked & calls are recorded.

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS, >SEARCH< & >Side Bars< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’ archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General ‘Stuff’ ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com

Skype: GregL-W

TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU
  
 
Advertisements