Hi,

we have for some years studied numerous areas of evil that are damaging to our values, justice and  way of life in Britain – damaging the foundations and influence of liberty and choice in Britain.

Let us look in some detail at the undeniable barbarism, corruption and lies of islamism.

Let us start with the invention of the concept of islam which was founded when Muhammed, sponsored by his considerably older and admittedly wealthy wife.

Muhammed is thought to have been born in around 570 CE near the desert settlement of Mecca where he lived most of life until his death in July 632 in the arms of his youngest wife, Aisha whom he married when she was 9 years old!

Islamic Invasion Of India:

The Greatest Genocide In History Muslim historian Firishta [full
name Muhammad Qasim Hindu Shah, born in 1560 and died in
1620], the author of the Tarikh-i Firishta and the Gulshan-i
Ibrahim, was the first to give an idea to the medieval bloodbath
that was India during Muslim rule, when he declared that over
400 million Hindus got slaughtered during Muslim invasion and
occupation of India. Survivors got enslaved and castrated.
India’s population is said to have been around 600 million at
the time of Muslim invasion. By the mid 1500’s the Hindu
population was 200 million. By the time the British arrived to
the shores of India and after centuries of Islamic law ruling
India, the Hindu population was not behaving like their normal
self; they were behaving like Muslims. There are many witness
reports from the British archives of horrendous Hindu incidents
that were shocking in cruelty to the British – and they therefore
sometimes referred to the people as “savages”. Yes, anyone
who gets contaminated by the association with Islamic ‘culture’
truly gets tainted and savaged. That is exactly why it is so
detrimental and dangerous. Today, like other cultures with a
soul massacred by Islam, India is not truly a Hindu nation.
India is a shadow of Islam, a Hindufied version of Islam, where
every human atrocity has been emulated and adopted into a
culture previously alien to such brutality. And in association
with it’s foreign mohamedan pest, these Islamic habits have
become adopted and accepted as a “normal” part of Indian
culture. But if we look at pre-Islamic Indian culture it was a in
general a benevolent culture of knowledge and learning, much
more so than it is today. From the time of the Umayyad
Dynasty (711AD) to the last Mughal, Bahadur Shah Zafar
(1858), so widely praised as great leaders by Indian historians
themselves, entire cities were burnt down and the populations

2
massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every
campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new
invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus,
the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by
the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still
called the Hindu Kush, i.e. “Hindu slaughter.”
The_Mughal_Empire The Mughal Empire’s spread and
occupation of India. The genocide suffered by the Hindus and
Sikhs of India at the hands of Arab, Turkish, Mughal and
Afghan occupying forces for a period of 800 years is as yet
formally unrecognised by the World. The only similar genocide
in the recent past was that of the Jewish people at the hands
of the Nazis. The holocaust of the Hindus in India was of even
greater proportions, the only difference was that it continued
for 800 years, till the brutal regimes were effectively
overpowered in a life and death struggle by the Sikhs in the
Punjab and the Hindu Maratha armies in other parts of India in
the late 1700’s. We have elaborate literary evidence of the
World’s biggest holocaust from existing historical contemporary
eyewitness accounts. The historians and biographers of the
invading armies and subsequent rulers of India have left quite
detailed records of the atrocities they committed in their day-
to-day encounters with India’s Hindus These contemporary
records boasted about and glorified the crimes that were
committed – and the genocide of tens of millions of Hindus,
mass rapes of Hindu women and the destruction of thousands
of ancient Hindu / Buddhist temples and libraries have been
well documented and provide solid proof of the World’s biggest
holocaust. Dr. Koenraad Elst in his article “Was There an
Islamic Genocide of Hindus?” states: “There is no official
estimate of the total death toll of Hindus at the hands of Islam.
A first glance at important testimonies by Muslim chroniclers

3
suggests that, over 13 centuries and a territory as vast as the
Subcontinent, Muslim Holy Warriors easily killed more Hindus
than the 6 million of the Holocaust. Ferishtha lists several
occasions when the Bahmani sultans in central India (1347-
1528) killed a hundred thousand Hindus, which they set as a
minimum goal whenever they felt like punishing the Hindus;
and they were only a third-rank provincial dynasty. The biggest
slaughters took place during the raids of Mahmud Ghaznavi
(ca. 1000 CE); during the actual conquest of North India by
Mohammed Ghori and his lieutenants (1192 ff.); and under the
Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526).” He also writes in his book
“Negation in India”: “The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th
century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death.
Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred,
with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and
similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new invader made
(often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of
Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation
of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu
Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter.” Will Durant argued in his 1935
book “The Story of Civilisation: Our Oriental Heritage” (page
459): “The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the
bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars
have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of
Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and
children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried
out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions
of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this
period.” Francois Gautier in his book ‘Rewriting Indian History’
(1996) wrote: “The massacres perpetuated by Muslims in India
are unparalleled in history, bigger than the Holocaust of the
Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the

4
Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South
American native populations by the invading Spanish and
Portuguese.” Writer Fernand Braudel wrote in A History of
Civilisations (1995), that Islamic rule in India as a “colonial
experiment” was “extremely violent”, and “the Muslims could
not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was
the norm – burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or
impalements, inventive tortures. Hindu temples were destroyed
to make way for mosques. On occasion there were forced
conversions. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and
savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was
laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as
slaves.” Alain Danielou in his book, Histoire de l’ Inde writes:
“From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the
history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of
murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions. It is, as
usual, in the name of ‘a holy war’ of their faith, of their sole
God, that the barbarians have destroyed civilizations, wiped out
entire races.” Irfan Husain in his article “Demons from the
Past” observes: “While historical events should be judged in the
context of their times, it cannot be denied that even in that
bloody period of history, no mercy was shown to the Hindus
unfortunate enough to be in the path of either the Arab
conquerors of Sindh and south Punjab, or the Central Asians
who swept in from Afghanistan…The Muslim heroes who figure
larger than life in our history books committed some dreadful
crimes. Mahmud of Ghazni, Qutb-ud-Din Aibak, Balban,
Mohammed bin Qasim, and Sultan Mohammad Tughlak, all
have blood-stained hands that the passage of years has not
cleansed..Seen through Hindu eyes, the Muslim invasion of
their homeland was an unmitigated disaster. “Their temples
were razed, their idols smashed, their women raped, their men

5
killed or taken slaves. When Mahmud of Ghazni entered
Somnath on one of his annual raids, he slaughtered all 50,000
inhabitants. Aibak killed and enslaved hundreds of thousands.
The list of horrors is long and painful. These conquerors
justified their deeds by claiming it was their religious duty to
smite non-believers. Cloaking themselves in the banner of
Islam, they claimed they were fighting for their faith when, in
reality, they were indulging in straightforward slaughter and
pillage…” Islam in India: The Afghan ruler Mahmud al-Ghazni
invaded India no less than seventeen times between 1001 –
1026 AD. The book ‘Tarikh-i-Yamini’ – written by his secretary
documents several episodes of his bloody military campaigns :
“The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously [at the Indian
city of Thanesar] that the stream was discoloured,
notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink
it…the infidels deserted the fort and tried to cross the foaming
river…but many of them were slain, taken or drowned… Nearly
fifty thousand men were killed.” In the contemporary record – ‘
Taj-ul-Ma’asir’ by Hassn Nizam-i-Naishapuri, it is stated that
when Qutb-ul- Din Aibak (of Turko – Afghan origin and the
First Sultan of Delhi 1194-1210 AD) conquered Meerat, he
demolished all the Hindu temples of the city and erected
mosques on their sites. In the city of Aligarh, he converted
Hindu inhabitants to Islam by the sword and beheaded all
those who adhered to their own religion. The Persian historian
Wassaf writes in his book ‘Tazjiyat-ul-Amsar wa Tajriyat ul
Asar’ that when the Alaul-Din Khilji (An Afghan of Turkish origin
and second ruler of the Khilji Dynasty in India 1295-1316 AD)
captured the city of Kambayat at the head of the gulf of
Cambay, he killed the adult male Hindu inhabitants for the
glory of Islam, set flowing rivers of blood, sent the women of
the country with all their gold, silver, and jewels, to his own

6
home, and made about twentv thousand Hindu maidens his
private slaves. India has a deep, long cultural history. Hinduism
began there around 1,500 BC and Buddhism around the 6th
century BC. This culture had evolved impressive intellectual,
religious and artistic pursuits. Pre and post the early days of
Islam, Indian scholars took their works in science, maths (zero,
algebra, geometry, the decimal system, so-called ‘Arabic’
numbers are actually Hindu ones!), medicine, philosophy etc to
the courts of others (including Muslims eg Baghdad). Others
came to study in India’s established universities. Indian
children (boys and girls) were educated in the relatively
widespread education system in a wide variety of subjects eg
science, medicine and philosophy. India’s art and architecture
was magnificent. They were a prosperous people. Then came
Islam – slaughter, slavery, rape, violence, pillage; destruction
of religious sites, art and architecture; poverty, exploitation,
humiliation, famine, forced conversion, decline in intellectual
pursuits, social destruction and a worsening of social ills. To
Islam, anything that is not Islamic is from a time of ignorance
–Jahiliyya- and must be destroyed (or appropriated and called
Islam’s!). The onslaught created the Roma (gypsies), destroyed
‘Hindu’ Afghanistan and formed Pakistan (Kashmir) and
Bangladesh . The cost of the Muslim invasions is massive in
lives, wealth and culture. Estimates suggest that 60-80
MILLION died at the hands of Muslim invaders and rulers
between 1000 and 1525 alone (ie over 500 years-the
population FELL). (Lal cited in Khan p 216) Impossible you
think? In the war of Independence of Bangladesh, 1971, the
Muslim Pakistani army killed 1.5-3 million people (mainly
Muslims …) in just 9 MONTHS. (Khan p 216). The world looked
the other way—but don’t we always when it’s Muslims
committing the violence! [*The actual number of Hindus

7
brutally slaughtered by Muslims were around 400 million, not
60-80 million, according to Firishta [1560-1620], the author of
the Tarikh-i Firishta and the Gulshan-i Ibrahim]. Based on the
figures that are available, the number of Indians enslaved is
enormous! The Muslim conquest of India was probably the
bloodiest in history: The Islamic historians and scholars have
recorded with utmost glee and pride of the slaughters of
Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and
children to slave-markets, and the destruction of temples
carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800AD to 1700 AD.
Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by the sword in this
period” (historian Durant cited in Khan p 201) And Rizwan
Salim (1997) writes what the Arab invaders really did: ‘ savages
at a very low level of civilisation and no culture worth the
name, from Arabia and West Asia, began entering India from
the early century onwards. Islamic invaders demolished
countless Hindu temples, shattered uncountable sculpture and
idols, plundered innumerable forts and palaces of Hindu kings,
killed vast numbers of Hindu men and carried off Hindu
women. ………but many Indians do not seem to recognize that
the alien Muslim marauders destroyed the historical evolution
of the earth’s most mentally advanced civilisation, the most
richly imaginative culture, and the most vigorously creative
society.” (cited in Khan p 179) Of course Indians pre-Islam,
fought, but it was NOT the practice to enslave or ravage, or
massacre, or destroy religious sites, or damage crops and
farmers. Battles were usually conducted on open soil between
military personnel. (Khan p 205-207) There was no concept of
‘booty’ so Indians were unprepared for Islam’s onslaught.
Indigenous Indians were forced to flee to jungles and
mountains, or face gruelling exploitation and taxes, slaughter
or enslavement while their society was demeaned and

8
destroyed. Muslims constantly attacked the indigenous,
idolatrous population and also fought against each other in
ceaseless revolts by generals, chiefs and princes during the
entire time of Islamic rule (Khan p 205). Slavery: Initially ‘India’
included part of today’s Pakistan (Sindh), Bangladesh/Bengal
and Kashmir. Hinduism and Buddhism flourished in Afghanistan
pre the Islamic takeover (7th century). In the 16th century
Afghanistan was divided between the Muslim Mogul (Mughal)
Empire of India and the Safavids of Persia. Initially the godless
Umayyads, allowed Hindus dhimmi status – possibly because of
their large numbers, resistance to Islam and their value as a
source of tax income. This violates Islamic text and law which
demands death or conversion for idolaters and polytheists.
When Sultan Iltutmish (d 1236) was asked why Hindus weren’t
given the choice between death and Islam, he replied: “but at
the moment in India…the Muslims are so few that they are like
salt (in a large dish) …however after a few years when in the
capital and the regions and all the small towns, when the
Muslims are well established and the troops are larger….it
would be possible to give Hindus the choice of death or Islam”
(cited in Lal [c] p 538) (Can we learn anything from this)
Despite their supposed ‘dhimmi’ status, mass slaughter, mass
forced conversion and mass enslavement with the resulting
forced conversion to Islam were practised throughout Islamic
rule and into the 20th century as many demanded the
idolaters/polytheists convert or die. Hindu fighters and males
were slaughtered with women and children enslaved. Eunuch
slavery was practised on young boys. Often actual numbers
aren’t given, just comments like ‘countless captives/slaves,’ or
‘all the women and children were taken.’ Where numbers are
recorded, they are terrifying. Along with people, the Muslims
took everything they could—coins, jewels, cloths, clothes,

9
furniture, idols, animals, grain etc or destroyed it. Muslim rulers
were foreigners. Until the 13th century, most slaves were sent
out of India but following the Sultanate of Delhi (1206) they
were retained to work for the sultanate, sold in India or sent
elsewhere. Slaves from elsewhere were imported and Muslim
armies were composed of a wide array of foreign slave groups
‘converted’ to Islam and ‘Hindus’ and Indian ‘converts.’ Slaves
were the promised booty from Allah and obtaining them was a
strong motivation for jihad. “slaves were so plentiful that they
became very cheap; men…were degraded….but this is the
goodness of Allah, who bestows honours on his own religion
and degrades infidelity”. (Muslim chronicler Utbi on Sultan
Subuktigin of Ghazni’s slave raid [942-997] in Sookdheo p166)
In Sindh (first area attacked successfully) the early ‘Muslim’
community was composed mainly of slaves forced into Islam
and a small number of Arab masters (Khan p 299). Initially
slaves were forced out of India eg Qasim (Arab), the conquerer
of Sindh sent by Hajjaj bin Yusuf Sakifi in the caliphate of Walid
I, took 300,000 from a 3 year campaign in 712-715 (Khan p
299, Trifkovic p 109). Muslim fighters came from everywhere to
partake in this ‘jihad.’ Qasim was suddenly recalled and
executed (possibly by being sown in an animal’s hide) for
supposedly violating 2 Sindhi princesses destined for the
caliph’s harem!! (Lal [c] p 439) The Ghaznivids-Turks from
Ghazni, Afghanistan (997-1206) who subdued the Punjab.
From 17 raids (997-1030) Sultan Muhmud Ghazni (Turk from
Afghanistan, 997-1030) sent hundreds of thousands of slaves
to Ghanzi (Afghanistan) resulting in a loss of about 2 million
people via slaughter or enslavement and sale outside India
(Khan p 315). Chroniclers (eg Utbi, the sultan’s secretary)
provide some numbers eg -from Thanesar, the Muslim army
brought 200,000 captives back to Ghazni (Afghanistan). In

10
1019, 53,000 were taken. At one time the caliph’s 1/5th share
was 150,000 suggesting 750,000 captives. 500,000 were taken
in one campaign (at Waihind)(Lal [c] p 551) Mahmud’s
secretary al-Utbi records: “Swords flashed like lightening amid
the blackness of clouds, and fountains of blood flowed like the
fall of setting star. The friends of god defeated their
opponents….the Musalmans wreaked their vengeance on the
infidel enemies of god killing 15,000 of them…making them
food of the beasts and birds of prey….god also bestowed on his
friends such an amount of booty as was beyond all bounds and
calculations, including 500,000 slaves beautiful men and
women” (Khan p 191) The Ghaznivid’s ruled in the ‘Islamic
sultanate of the Punjab’ till 1186. Attacks in Kashmir, Hansi,
and districts of the Punjab resulted in mass slaughter and
enslavement eg 100,000 in a 1079 attack in the Punjab (Tarik
–i-Alfi in Khan p 276-7, Lal [d] p 553 Under the Ghaurivid rulers
(Turks) eg Muhammad Ghauri (Afghani) and his military
commander then ruler, Qutbuddin Aibak (r1206-1210), the
Delhi sultanate was set up. Mass beheadings, enslavements,
forced conversions, plunder and the destruction of temples
continued. Slaves were incredibly plentiful. In 1195, Aibak took
20,000 slaves from Raja Bhim and 50,000 at Kalinjar (1202)
(Lal [c] p 536). “even the poor (Muslim) householder became
owner of numerous slaves.’ (Khan 103, Lal [c] p 537). Through
the 13/14th century ruled by the Khilji (Khaljis) and Tughlaq’s,
slavery grew as Islam spread. Thousands of slaves were sold at
a low price everyday (Khan p 280). Alauddin Khilji’s (r 1296-
1316) capture of slaves was stupendous and he shackled,
chained and humiliated slaves (Lal [c] p 540). In the sack of
Somnath alone he: “took captive a great number of handsome
and elegant maidens, amounting to 20,000 and children of
both sexes ..more than the pen can enumerate. The

11
Mohammadan army brought the country to utter ruin,
destroyed the lives of inhabitants, and plundered the cities and
captured their offspring.” (historian cited in Bostom p 641, Lal
[c] p 540) Many thousands were massacred. Alauddin Khilji (r
1296-1316) had 50,000 slave BOYS in his personal service and
70,000 slaves worked continuously on his buildings.(Lal [c] p
541) Women practised Jauhar (burning or killing oneself to
avoid enslavement and rape) and sati. The Sufi Amir Khusrau
notes “the Turks, whenever they please, can seize, buy or sell
any Hindu” (Lal [c] p 541) Enslaved and Castrated Eunuchs: All
over the Islamic world, the conquered were castrated, including
in India. This was done so men could guard harems, provide
carnal indulgence for rulers, give devotion to the ruler as they
had no hope of a family of their own and of course, this quickly
reduced the breeding stock of the conquered. Castration was a
common practice throughout Muslim rule possibly contributing
to the DECLINE in India’s population from 200 million in 1000
CE to 170 million in 1500 CE (Khan p 314) Once Sultan
Bakhtiyar Khilji conquered Bengal in 1205, it became a leading
supplier of castrated slaves. This remained the case into the
Mogul period (1526-1857). Akbar the Great (1556-1605) owned
eunuchs. Said Khan Chaghtai owned 1,200 eunuchs (an official
of Akbar’s son Jahangir)! In Aurangzeb’s reign, in 1659 at
Golkunda (Hyderabad), 22,000 boys were emasculated and
given to Muslim rulers and governors or sold. (Khan 313).
Sultan Alauddin Khilji (r 1296-1316) had 50,000 boys in his
personal service; Sultan Muhammad Tughlaq (r 1325-51) had
20,000 and Sultan Firoz Tughlaq (r 1351-1388) had 40,000
(Firoz Tulghlaq liked to collect boys in any way and had
180,000 slaves in total (Lal [c] p 542). Several commanders
under various sultans were eunuchs. Muslim historians record
the ‘infatuation’ of sultans Mahmud Ghazni, Qutbuddin Aibak,

12

To View the Original Article CLICK HERE

.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

Greg Lance – Watkins
GregLW            GL-W
GLW Documents

Climate Change
of Wales & the Welsh
MY PODCASTS
My Health Blog – Cancer etc.
WEF, Agenda 21&30, NWO, UN etc.
&
To SEE Many More

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Regarding TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW

From 04-Jul-2022 until Early December 2022:
I was banned from TWITTER.
Allegedly I have broken a TWITTER Rule,
But, Seemingly they lacked the integrity or competence
to identify the rule!
PRESUMABLY I told the Truth or Used a fact
that does not suit their corrupt WOKE agenda,
bias or propaganda!

As the corrupt & biased owners no longer use their lies,
bias & propaganda on Twitter to Un-platform People
& it is no longer owned & managed by them
as Elon Musk has purchased the platform:
I have rejoined by deleting my provably accurate
Tweet:
TWITTER BAN 04-July-2022

Remove Tweet

Tweet 1 of 1

Violating one of our Rules.

Greg_Lance-Watkins
@Greg_LW

They sexualise children as young as 5 at school. But #Prince_Andrew paid £12M for NOT having intercourse with a minor & #Ghislaine got 20yrs. but not a single #Epstein client has been charged, let alone prosecuted! https://t.co/ckGbEMFxVf

Jul 4, 2022, 12:00 PM

By clicking Remove, you are removing the content of your Tweet and all other edited versions of the tweet, and forgoing the option to appeal this violation. Please note that the original content will be replaced with a notice stating your Tweet is no longer available because it violated the Twitter Rules. This notice will be accessible via direct URL and via your profile timeline for 14 days. Learn more.

If you feel that your account has been locked in error, you can appeal by contacting our support team here.

PLEASE NOTE:
Every part of the Tweet is a provable FACT,
the truth seems not to have been popular –
Let us hope Elon Musk’s ownership will lead to greater integrity on Twitter!