The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

in reading Richard’s article featuring the islamist street murderer in Solingen Germany, let us try to avoid the reality that what politicians and particularly the irresponsible largely extreme left wing politicians, media and police try to pass off as an epidemic of ‘knife crime’ – this is just the behaviour of the corrupt Left Wing  NO KNIFE IN HISTORY ever committed a crime and as for an epidemic of criminal knives is a cowardly failure to tell the truth!

There is an indisputable burgeoning of Black violent criminal behaviour, particularly in urban areas. 

Do note many of the crimes of these violent scrotes are knife attacks OF Blacks ON Blacks. These crimes could be greatly reduced, saving the lives of many young Blacks by targeted ‘Stop and Search’ of the most likely criminals – namely young Black males.

This statistics are somewhat skewed by the irrefutable knife crimes by Muslims, many of them are not in fact Black but Asians – primarily Pakistani and Middle Eastern. I say skewed as this group is raising the numbers of knife crimes, but far from the bulk of instances, though each outrage committed in the name of Allah, on the direct encouragement of the barbaric medieval muslim cult, following the vile encouragement of their disgusting instruction manual, the quran! and the so called religious leaders of this totally alien cult.

Immigration: no longer a safe country

By Richard North – August 29, 2024

In the aftermath of a knife attack in Solingen, Germany, carried out by a Syrian national, the chairman of the German Police Union (DPoIG), Manuel Ostermann, has voiced strong criticism of the country’s immigration policies and security situation.

Ostermann, who represents nearly 100,000 police union members, stated in a video message, “Germany is no longer a safe country. We have a massive problem with knife crime. The migration crisis is first and foremost a crime crisis”. He emphasised that Islamism poses the “greatest danger to life and limb of people living in Germany”.

The report from which I cite goes on to note that the union leader’s comments come at a time of heightened tensions following recent violent incidents, including an attack in Mannheim that resulted in a police officer’s death. Ostermann expresses frustration with what he perceives as inadequate political responses to these events.

In an interview with Apollo News, he highlighted concerns about budget cuts to police resources despite increasing threat levels. He also pointed to what he sees as failures in asylum policy, citing a lack of deportation detention centres and bureaucratic inefficiencies.

What is so very startling about this is that, while a police union chief is prepared to break ranks and identify the Islamist threat, Interior Minister Nancy Faeser is ploughing the same dreary furrow frequented by British and other European politicians, that faaaah-right extremism is the country’s primary security threat – despite the recent crime statistics and violent incidents not supporting that fantasy version of events.

There is a difference, though, with multicultural Britain, where violent crime and especially knife crime is disproportionately committed by blacks, mainly – but not by any means exclusively – of Caribbean heritage. Not a day seems to go by, now, without a report of some unfortunate victim being stabbed, the latest being a disabled man on a mobility scooter hacked to death with a machete in East London.

But, unlike Britain, where the politico-media establishment has sought – largely successfully – to keep attention focused on supposedly “far right” rioters, swerving any meaningful public debate on immigration, the Solingen attack has reignited debates about immigration and security policies in Germany.

But what has particularly focused the debate in Germany is the background to the treatment of the Solingen killer, who had previously been subject to a deportation order but, at the time of the killing had been granted protected status, having previously been in hiding.

Germany too seems to have is fair share of tone-deaf politicians, one of which is Social Democrat leader Saskia Esken who, in response to the Solingen murders, commented, “I don’t think we can learn much from this attack”. Predictably, this has triggered outraged discussions about Germany’s approach to immigration and security challenges.

Just how empty is that statement is highlighted by the online news magazine Focus which gives Ostermann a guest slot to explain precisely those things which should be learnt, as he points to the gaps in Federal controls and lists six measures which should be taken.

Many of these are obviously German-specific, but they have some relevance to the UK situation where controls are also weak and often poorly enforced. One point Ostermann does make, though – which could apply in full to the UK – is the advice that we need to differentiate between short-term, medium-term and long-term measures.

Not everything, he says, can be implemented immediately but he emphasises that targeted measures must be taken. And that indeed would be an innovation for the UK where the Starmer regime position is to avoid discussing the issue at all.

Interestingly, the first of Ostermann’s six points is not a procedural measure but is what might be termed a philosophical or attitudinal change. The essential point, he writes, “is that there must be no need for subsidiary protection for enemies of the constitution, criminals and terrorists”.

This is a point well made. The whole of European immigration policy – as much as in the UK – seems to be driven by a policy of reverse discrimination where immigrant and immigrant heritage “communities” are given preferential treatment, favouring them rather than the indigenous population.

No more so is this so obvious than it the treatment of illegal immigrants who rock up to these shores to be rewarded with hotel rooms, pocket money and free meals, while our own homeless are left to fend for themselves, often in conditions of extreme hardship.

But this favouritism seems to pervade all areas of society, and especially the judicial system, pace a report yesterday when an import living in Bradford was prosecuted for attacking three “defenceless women” in broad daylight for not wearing traditional Asian dress and for wearing make-up.

This was Muhammed Hassan, who grabbed the female driver of a car in a petrol station and slammed her head on the dashboard. He grabbed another woman’s hair and punched her in the head, and then punched the third woman, having first abusing them as “slags” and “prostitutes” before demanding that they dress conservatively.

This is far more common in Bradford than the court records would indicate, and although actual physical violence is less common, the intimidation and threat of violence is always there.

But, in this case where there was actual violence, and the police could be bothered to intervene, Hassan’s actions were rewarded by a kindly judge, Colin Burn, with six months imprisonment, suspended for two years, allowing him to walk free from the court.

When white grannies are imprisoned for posting on the net that such vile scum might perhaps be immolated in the mosques they infest, charges of differential treatment are easily made.

Returning to Ostermann’s list, this includes points about the integrity of border controls being maintained, giving the federal government (as opposed to the states) power to terminate residence rights of immigrants, and the establishment of federal deportation detention centres.

He also calls for “a solid budget for the Federal Police”, which is unfortunately not currently provided for by the Federal Government, with enough funding to “get ahead of the situation”. This means equipping security authorities with AI-driven video technology with anonymised behaviour recognition, with mandatory placement at “neuralgic points” and major events.

He complains that the police spend hours flying blind after attacks and are dependent on random video recordings of the population. This, he says, “must come to an end”.

As well as investing in new technologies, Ostermann wants local and central immigration authorities strengthened, the number of administrative courts increased, a massive expansion of deportation detention places and strengthening of the judiciary as a whole.

Interestingly, he also calls for immediate implementation of a regime where data protection no longer takes precedence over victim protection. It is essential, he says, to equip our constitutional protection and intelligence services effectively and to expand communication with all security and administrative authorities.

But what then marks out this intervention is Ostermann’s final comment where he says that his “bundle of measures” is about more than “just” a security policy issue. It is, he declares, “about preserving our Federal Republic of Germany as we know and love our country”, adding, “it is also about the question of how we want to live together in Europe”.

The man has the measure of the moment, expressing sentiments which seem to be gathering force throughout Europe. Latest of the interventions comes from deputy Prime Minister of Sweden, Ebba Busch, who says: “Islam needs to adapt to Swedish values”, going on to say: “Muslims who do not integrate should leave the country. Honor killings, clan structures, beheadings, the stoning of women, and Sharia law do not belong here”.

Would that we had a single politician or senior official in the UK who could express similar sentiments. Security policy has a weighting that politicians currently seem to be failing to recognise, says Ostermann, and this situation is no longer acceptable. He could be speaking for England – I wish he was.

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

Greg Lance – Watkins
GregLW            GL-W
GLW Documents

Climate Change
of Wales & the Welsh
MY PODCASTS
My Health Blog – Cancer etc.
WEF, Agenda 21&30, NWO, UN etc.
&
To SEE Many More

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Regarding TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW

From 04-Jul-2022 until Early December 2022:
I was banned from TWITTER.
Allegedly I have broken a TWITTER Rule,
But, Seemingly they lacked the integrity or competence
to identify the rule!
PRESUMABLY I told the Truth or Used a fact
that did not suit their corrupt WOKE agenda,
bias or propaganda! AT THE TIME!

As the corrupt & biased owners no longer use their lies,
bias & propaganda on Twitter to Un-platform People
& it is no longer owned & managed by them
as Elon Musk has purchased the platform:
I have rejoined by deleting
my provably accurate
Tweet:
TWITTER BAN 04-July-2022

Remove Tweet

Tweet 1 of 1

Violating one of our Rules.

Greg_Lance-Watkins
@Greg_LW

They sexualise children as young as 5 at school. But #Prince_Andrew paid £12M for NOT having intercourse with a minor &; #Ghislaine got 20yrs. but not a single #Epstein client has been charged, let alone prosecuted! https://t.co/ckGbEMFxVf

Jul 4, 2022, 12:00 PM

By clicking Remove, you are removing the content of your Tweet and all other edited versions of the tweet, and forgoing the option to appeal this violation. Please note that the original content will be replaced with a notice stating your Tweet is no longer available because it violated the Twitter Rules. This notice will be accessible via direct URL and via your profile timeline for 14 days. Learn more.

If you feel that your account has been locked in error, you can appeal by contacting our support team here.

PLEASE NOTE:
Every part of the Tweet is a provable FACT,
the truth seems not to have been popular –
Let us hope Elon Musk’s ownership will lead to greater integrity on Twitter!

DO BEWARE of AI :
A Friend Recently entered my name in an AI Search Engine:
Apparently Greg Lance-Watkins
Was recently found guilty of a double homicide
in Tennessee, USA.
I was last in America in December 1979,
I am not, nor have I ever been in Court
or prison in America!