Hi,

.

Consider: Harry, Duke of Sussex

Firstly we have little option but to consider Mrs. Meghan Mountbatten-Windsor nee Markle, the relatively unknown actress & American divorcee currently married to Harry Duke of Sussex.
It would seem she was and is about as popular as a pig in a Mosque and managed to alienate almost every member of her family.

Just think for a moment, what have you seen her acting in? Have you, in fact, ever watched Suits, a minor Canadian cable TV show, I watched about 5 episodes and barely noticed her as she was merely a sex angle & not a lead character. Even now I know of nothing else she was ever in.

Meghan would seem to be a very manipulative & untrustworthy liar, with a lengthy track record of betrayal and using and dropping people.

Due to her dishonesty and outright lies and endless efforts to enrich herself and manipulate situations to be the centre of attention, not to mention her apparent thefts of jewellery, overt racism, disloyalty and lack of integrity and gratitude, deference or generosity Meghan is daily becoming less popular and less relevant to the people of Britain – America must make of her what they will, which would seem little more than as quoted ‘A F******* Grifter’.

Consider Harry:

True Harry was born into great wealth and privilege, with all the benefits his brother had but none of the graver & total immersion responsibilities. Even as a small child Harry was a brat and his mother had great medical concerns for his vicious jealousy, temper tantrums & endless need to be the centre of attention.

Diana sought medical assistance for his mental health problems and from an early age was often called into his school because of his behaviour – he never passed an exam of consequence and even his brother, without rancour, sought to distance himself at school.

Harry’s entry to RMAS (Sandhurst) was on account of his status and not ability. His Military time was hardly ‘service’ it was sporadic and largely for show – as with his time in private quarters with his own staff in Helmand.

As for Harry’s much-vaunted personal bodyguard, its purpose was primarily to control him and keep him out of trouble with the media – not exactly bodyguards as he would have you believe, mainly to restrain him when there was the risk of Harry, either drink, drugs or temper tantrum induced, picked fights with the media!

Harry lacked the charm and guile of his mother who realised the media were her ticket to popularity – she worked closely with the media and often phoned them to provide them with stories she wanted/was willing to have placed. She would provide her favoured paparazzi with photo opportunities in return for them obfuscating her whereabouts or behaviour!

Sadly Harry was too young to really know or have any understanding of his Mother and it seems he has built something of a fantasy image of her and a very strange understanding of her and her lifestyle & values.

Let us start and finish on that subject with the last few days of her life – she had been in the Med with one of her boyfriends, of which she had had many since she married Charles, some prior to her divorce but mostly after. That Doddi Fayed, son of Mohammed Fayed, owner of a grand yacht, a grand hotel in Paris and a grand shop in London (Harrods!) was one of her regular lovers is indisputable but although, as he was single, unlike several of her other lovers, this gave rise to media gossip that she was planning on marrying him. There is of course, no evidence of this.

On her last night of life Diana and her lover ate late in his father’s hotel, it is believed they were planning to stay in the hotel, but after dinner there was a change of plan – This led to the hotel chauffer, who had stood down sometime earlier, being called in, he was Doddi’s regular chauffer when in Paris.

The couple left via the backdoor of the hotel to avoid the press. Diana’s bodyguard was seated in the front she and her lover were in the back. Neither of them in the back bothered with their seatbelts.

The Mercedes 600 saloon pulled away and travelled through the traffic at what many would consider to have been too fast. in the lenthy open tunnelsweeping around the hill to the right, the chauffer was travelling at speeds, believed to be, in excess of 100mph and lost control of the vehicle due, most likely, to excess speed and possible influence of drink and tiredness.

Diana’s bodyguard survived the accident due to wearing his seatbelt.

Diana was thrown forward, from her position cross her lovers lap, she hit the back of the front seats where she was sandwiched between the seat and the weight of her lover’s body. It is understood that the crush injuries Diana sustained, her aorta was ruptured and she was barely conscious when the emergency services arrived – it is believed the Doctor feared the consequence of moving either the body of Doddi – it is understood the aortal rupture opened with movement and Diana ‘bled out’ rapidly.

Despite the much-claimed fantasies, I use the term fantasies as there is zero credible evidence and no witness or material evidence of any other vehicle causing the accident, there was thus, I believe, no evidence indicates the media played absolutely no role in the accident or the death of Diana.

I appreciate Harry has built an absolute career of self-pity and victim status on HIS fantasies regarding his Mother’s relationship with the media, a relationship he had zero personal understanding or experience of as he was far too young when his mother died.

On the subject of building fantasies, I CONSIDER that those who use cell phones should have no complaint nor recourse to law, if they fail to ensure their privacy thereon due to failing to realise they are insecure as a means of communication especially if as the owner you do not alter factory set passwords or numbers! A fantasy Harry has done everything to try to cash in on.

Cumulatively it is my opinion that Harry and his wife should, particularly as they have sought to usurp aspects of the Crown and endeavour to elevate their income and status at the expense of King Charles and the Prince of Wales, banishment for life would be appropriate.

I Believe Harry & his wife have no role to play in Britain and wish them well for their future overseas and see no need, nor value in hearing from them or about them again. Further, I believe that not only would their absence be of value to Britain it would benefit the Monarchy and The Commonwealth.

Were it to be put to a national vote of the electorate, I believe, such an action would be voted for by a clear majority.

Harry & Meghan have nothing to offer – perhaps, as it is not filmed in Britain, they might choose to continue their existence as irrelevant Slebs on ‘I’m a Sleb Get Me Out of Here’ or perhaps more to their liking ‘Love Island’ though let us hope we get no further pictures of Harry naked nor in his Nazi garb, nor pictures of Meghan in her underwear or in obscenely overpriced costumes paid for as a F****** Grifter!

To View the Original Article CLICK HERE

.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

Greg Lance – Watkins
GregLW            GL-W
GLW Documents

Climate Change
of Wales & the Welsh
MY PODCASTS
My Health Blog – Cancer etc.
WEF, Agenda 21&30, NWO, UN etc.
&
To SEE Many More

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Regarding TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW

From 04-Jul-2022 until Early December 2022:
I was banned from TWITTER.
Allegedly I have broken a TWITTER Rule,
But, Seemingly they lacked the integrity or competence
to identify the rule!
PRESUMABLY I told the Truth or Used a fact
that does not suit their corrupt WOKE agenda,
bias or propaganda!

As the corrupt & biased owners no longer use their lies,
bias & propaganda on Twitter to Un-platform People
& it is no longer owned & managed by them
as Elon Musk has purchased the platform:
I have rejoined by deleting my provably accurate
Tweet:
TWITTER BAN 04-July-2022

Remove Tweet

Tweet 1 of 1

Violating one of our Rules.

Greg_Lance-Watkins
@Greg_LW

They sexualise children as young as 5 at school. But #Prince_Andrew paid £12M for NOT having intercourse with a minor & #Ghislaine got 20yrs. but not a single #Epstein client has been charged, let alone prosecuted! https://t.co/ckGbEMFxVf

Jul 4, 2022, 12:00 PM

By clicking Remove, you are removing the content of your Tweet and all other edited versions of the tweet, and forgoing the option to appeal this violation. Please note that the original content will be replaced with a notice stating your Tweet is no longer available because it violated the Twitter Rules. This notice will be accessible via direct URL and via your profile timeline for 14 days. Learn more.

If you feel that your account has been locked in error, you can appeal by contacting our support team here.

PLEASE NOTE:
Every part of the Tweet is a provable FACT,
the truth seems not to have been popular –
Let us hope Elon Musk’s ownership will lead to greater integrity on Twitter!