Hi,

.

I believe you are moving in the right direction but light on facts or examples –

To start with, it is claimed Meghan declared:

“I Am a Princess & It’s My Right!”?

Meghan Mountbatten – Windsor is nothing more than the wife of Henry Charles Albert Mountbatten – Windsor The Duke of Sussex, one of the sons of the current Monarch, hence he may call himself a  Prince ( a style commonly used which is in the gift of The Monarch by authority of the Government), Meghan may, by common practice identify herself as his wife by calling herself Princess Henry, Duchess of Sussex. Neither title is hers by right, merely by her association with Harry.

– Consider the comment ‘That much we know from the Oprah interview’ – all we learned from that PR stunt was that as a journalist Oprah was a lightweight entertainer but had the journalistic skills of a woodlouse!.

I recorded a lengthy and factually detailed Podcast, which you can find on my Web Site: Greg_L-W’s Umbrella Site For Worldwide Political & General Views, News & Facts immediately after Oprah’s PR stunt showing her utter dishonesty and incompetence as a journalist and identifying some 17 outright and consequential lies by the odious little backstabbing racist trailer trash Meghan, who let us not forget has a track record of self-serving abject betrayal of her family, at least one failed marriage and the sex attraction in the Canadian cable series Suits, where her CV in her own hand claimed she was Caucasian, NOT mixed race.

Britain is one of, if not the, least racist country I have ever been to and that amounts to around 70! It is quite astonishing that in a Country like Britain which has been ethnically white for 1,000s of years and only in the last Century did any number of non-European, non-Caucasians enter Britain and be minded that Britain NEVER legitimised slavery and made it expressly forbidden in 1833 buying the liberty of slaves around the world at a cost that was only finally repaid in 2015 – Britain enforced an end to slavery, both in every Commonwealth Country and on the High Seas, at the expense of the British taxpayers!

One wonders why people of colour in Britain are so overtly racist!.

Do not forget Harry is merely the younger brother of William Prince of Wales who is the heir to the throne – Harry would still be 5th. in line to the British throne however, he CHOSE to renege on his inheritance, which had given him wealth, privilege, and a life of great advantages as a brother of a future King.

Sadly as a child, Harry had consequential mental health issues – including temper tantrums, seemingly attention seeking and sufficiently severe that his Mother sought medical advice and psychiatric help – even Harry’s tedious and self-indulgent book admits to his jealousy of his older brother and it was clear from the book that he has little understanding of loyalty or duty and that he is still irresponsible, self-indulgent, prone to temper tantrums and childish outbursts. Clearly, Harry is far from bright.

I believe Britain is very fortunate that he CHOSE to remove himself from his regal duties as he clearly lacks either the intellect good grace or stability to hold office.

That Meghan, who was made so very welcome at ALL levels of British society lied and used her colour to try to denigrate Britain and the Royal Household, particularly as it became steadily obvious, from her ‘entitled’ behaviour and viciously unpleasant, manipulative efforts and sneering denigration of the family and country that had so clearly welcomed her – highlighted her betrayal of her father and family prior to coming to Britain.

As seems so obvious and commonplace a guest turns to their colour and behaves in a racist manner – a strange course of action!

We are fortunate that Meghan’s only titles and income from Britain is utterly dependent on Harry and both of them have renounced all but the statement of fact, that as the son of the monarch, Harry is a Prince by nomenclature, and as a Wedding present his Grandmother ennobled him as a Duke – by name Duke of Sussex. By virtue of her marriage, Meghan is permitted to allude to her husband’s title – she has zero entitlement to being a Princes as she is NOT the child of the Monarch though she can CALL HERSELF Duchess of Sussex being the wife of the Duke.

Harry has, with Meghan, renounced and reneged on their honour and duties of regality, and thus Harry is no longer automatically an heir to the throne & Meghan never was!

Interestingly Harry admitted to a reporter in Canada that he had considered applying for American citisenship, though he may find his self proclaimed habitual drug taking may preclude that, it could be that the necessity to renounce British citisenship would put him off the idea as the children proclaimed as Meghan’s would lose their right, allegedly inherited, to British citisenship.

I do, notably above, call into question the parentage of the children as there would seem to be a great deal of genuine photographic evidence that Meghan’s alleged pregnancy may well have been fake and there is speculation that she may have become infertile from an earlier pregnancy.

There seems to be every possibility of surrogacy but frankly as they have zero lineage to the British Crown it matters little and is thus a matter for Harry’s wider family, I note their only titles are a matter of what seems little more than nick-names being Prince & Princess as I see no Civil List proclamation of that status which was adopted by Harry FOR THEM!

Perhaps Harry should consider taking the status of Banishment as vested on Edward VIII & his wife the American multiple divorcee Wallis Simpson. An action taken in the interest of strengthening the Monarchy subsequent to Edward’s abdication and renouncing his Regality and becoming merely Duke of Windsor with, by marriage, his Duchess.

Perhaps it would not be unreasonable, in the light of dishonesty and manipulative duplicity, that the nomenclature of Duchess might be spelt Douchess!

It is worthy of note that Meghan has no right, however tenuous it may be to style HERSELF Princess Henry as wife of Prince Harry – his real name being Henry Charles Albert Mountbatten-Windsor, Meghan may well be further distanced as it is rumoured that the children may be renamed losing their official surname and being called Sussex, to try to capitalise on Harry’s title, by gift of his Grandmother, as Duke of Sussex.

It is my opinion Meghan and Harry belittle themselves and demean Harry’s title by clearly making every effort to monetise his title and her marriage by exploitation on their newly launched website – nowhere using their names but exploiting distant and renounced Regality! Even on one page using a Crown & on many pages a stylised H surmounted by a Coronette and on some pages announcing the page as THE OFFICIAL site when it is NOT official – it is at best on behalf of Harry & Meghan!

It is all greatly debased especially when they boast of work for The Commonwealth & Monarchy.

I am also bemused as to why on the one hand The Circus Macabre was banned as a form of entertainment – yet much is made of the performance of the injured, deformed and cripples in The Invictus Games and Para Olympics, neither of which do I consider to be tasteful spectator sports – let us all cheer the person with no legs as he runs on his steel springs or perhaps even his hands.

To View the Original Article CLICK HERE

.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

Greg Lance – Watkins
GregLW            GL-W
GLW Documents

Climate Change
of Wales & the Welsh
MY PODCASTS
My Health Blog – Cancer etc.
WEF, Agenda 21&30, NWO, UN etc.
&
To SEE Many More

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Regarding TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW

From 04-Jul-2022 until Early December 2022:
I was banned from TWITTER.
Allegedly I have broken a TWITTER Rule,
But, Seemingly they lacked the integrity or competence
to identify the rule!
PRESUMABLY I told the Truth or Used a fact
that does not suit their corrupt WOKE agenda,
bias or propaganda!

As the corrupt & biased owners no longer use their lies,
bias & propaganda on Twitter to Un-platform People
& it is no longer owned & managed by them
as Elon Musk has purchased the platform:
I have rejoined by deleting my provably accurate
Tweet:
TWITTER BAN 04-July-2022

Remove Tweet

Tweet 1 of 1

Violating one of our Rules.

Greg_Lance-Watkins
@Greg_LW

They sexualise children as young as 5 at school. But #Prince_Andrew paid £12M for NOT having intercourse with a minor & #Ghislaine got 20yrs. but not a single #Epstein client has been charged, let alone prosecuted! https://t.co/ckGbEMFxVf

Jul 4, 2022, 12:00 PM

By clicking Remove, you are removing the content of your Tweet and all other edited versions of the tweet, and forgoing the option to appeal this violation. Please note that the original content will be replaced with a notice stating your Tweet is no longer available because it violated the Twitter Rules. This notice will be accessible via direct URL and via your profile timeline for 14 days. Learn more.

If you feel that your account has been locked in error, you can appeal by contacting our support team here.

PLEASE NOTE:
Every part of the Tweet is a provable FACT,
the truth seems not to have been popular –
Let us hope Elon Musk’s ownership will lead to greater integrity on Twitter!