DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<     >Side Bars<
& The Top – Below Title>PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

G.L-W’s ECLECTIC VIEWS & WEBLOG

.
Racism & Slavery are so often misunderstood due to a refusal to consider either facts or history – often motivated by hate, jealousy or greed! …

.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
GregLW            GL-W
GLW Documents

eMail:

Greg_L-W@BTconnect.co

ControversiallyGreg@Gmail.com

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

follow me on
TWITTER – X:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW
or:
https://twitter.com/Controv44553741
& on

PARLER:
https://parler.com/GregLW

FACEBOOK:
(20+) Facebook

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

WHITE SLAVE TRADE 01

Hi,

it is astonishing how little some Americans know about matters beyond their State border, let alone beyond their very introspective Country and less about history!

Even American authorities have been in denial of much of the history of the ethnic Americans and early settlers – almost in denial of ANY settlers prior to the influx of settlers post Columbus’ landing in the Bahamas – America has been in denial of its own peoples and civilisations.

There is also a culture of racism as a foundation for jealousy and the belief that everyone else is responsible for their failures never accepting blame for their own failures as with such terrorist organisations as Black Power, Weather Underground, Black Panthers, Black Lives Matter and their like.

The concept that the people of today who never owned or traded slaves should in some way pay compensation to others who never were slaves based on race is just licensing the criminal activities of terrorists and grifters and as such utterly unacceptable – as are all claims based out of the context of their time – or should the black slavers pay reparations to the 1.3 million British slaves sold in Africa or perhaps Ital should compensate the British for slaves taken by The Romans.

I am always confused by the strange term ‘African-American’. Surely if you were born in the USA you are an American. Do German-Americans, English-Americans, Australian-Americans, japanese-Americans, etc., etc exist in the USA or is it just preferanble to use the, to me, racist term ‘African-American’ in such a way as it implies 2nd class citizen.

What are Americans not just Americans? it all seems very odd.

King Richard II was born in 1452 & succeeded to the throne of England in 1482 though at 32 he was killed at the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485. He did not receive the funeral of a Monarch having died in defeat and although a Yorkist he was the last of The Plantagenet Kings.

It is true that he was embroilled in the assassination of the two princes, but that is more by lineage of a Shakespear Tragedy than by fact – though the bodies of two lads were found buried under a step in The Tower of London, subsequent modern DNA would seem to indicate they were not of Regal lineage.

Richard III’s body, although interred in 1485 was not located until 2012, when on documentary evidence, a hunch and assiduous research it was found in a grave under a car park in Leicester!

King Richard III was reinterred 530 years after his death, with full pageantry & Royalty in attendance in Leicester Cathedral in 2015.

There is no contemporary evidence nor do the skeletal remains indicate he was a cripple, though portrayed as such in Shakespeare’s Tragedy.

There is of course, no relationship with America nor any indication that he was other than Caucasian ethnicity and British descent.

Although paleontology and the geological record shows that America was extensively inhabited for some 20,000 years prior to the reign of Richard III – it is believed by peoples of the same lineage as the Chinese Northern Han and the Siberians, across the land bridge where the Bering Straits now exist and down through Alaska, which was still held by their Russian ancestors prior to its purchase in 1867 for $7.2M.

It is also worth noting that much of the East Coast was settled by Vikings who originated from Russia, via, most probably Scandinavia & the farm settlements in Greenland C800. It is also believed there were settlements from Britain made in East Coast America, as far south as Virginia around the same time as those of The Vikings.

The indigenous population of North America was well established by around 5,000BCE and had likely spread throughout the land mass by the end of the iceage around 13,000 years ago, there is also clear evidence of Southward movement into Amazonia and the rest of South America.

I appreciate there is every reason to believe Richard III had zero contact with the Americas and was also NOT coloured being an ethnic British Plantagenant of the house of York!

Outward movement from the Americas was only subsequent to the expedition of Columbus of 1492 when he came into contact with the Carib peoples of the Caribean Islands – prior to either the settlement of Caucasians or blacks purchased from their black captors and slavemasters in West coast Africa. a trade that did not gather momentum until late 1700s.

As for the likelihood of a Black British Monarch, there is no evidence of same either by conquest, inheritance or marriage. The only recorded and confirmed Black marriage was not until Prince Harry married a half-caste black girl, who was welcomed by all in Britain until she started to behave in an extremely racist manner in lies and self-aggrandisement based on her determination to make her race an issue – fortunately for Britain Meghan Markle renounced such febrile regality as she had achieved through marriage to Prince Henry Duke of Sussex, the second son of King Charles III and one of Queen Elizabeth II’s many grandchildren.

Amongst those of us with the relevant contacts and command of facts it is clear that we are better off without both Harry & Meghan and consider it good fortune that they renounced their limited Regality and chose to renege on such duties as they had – of course, even by marriage Meghan Mountbatten-Windsor held no title or Regality though by gift she and Harry were made Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Henry, was by common usage styled Prince Harry, being the heir to the throne, now Monarch’s second son.

It would probably be acceptable if Meghan chose to style herself, as a result of her marriage, Princess Henry Duchess of Sussex Meghan Mountbatten-Windsor.

In view of Harry’s widely known Mental Health problems, appreciated from early childhood and unresolved – largely blamed on his Mother’s promiscuity, her own mental health issues and her unfortunate death, brought upon herself by her foolish lifestyle and failure to use a seatbelt in a car being driven ar excessive and irresponsible speed.

The outcome was of course her tragic death which Harry has, unlike many who have lost a parent, never came to terms with and has spent the last 27 years using for personal gain, self-pity – many lose a parent early in life – be minded his mother had severe mental health issues, as inherited by Harry, used the media for her own gain and was in a car crashed by grossly negligent and irresponsibility – also had Either Diana or her lover that night used seat belts it is probable both would have survived – Diana crashed off of her partner’s lap and into the back of the seat in front where she was crushed by her partner’s body thrown forward, without a seatbelt, she survived the impact though her aorta would seem to have been ruptured and although alive and just able to speak, as soon as the medical team tried to move her the aorta opened and she would have ‘bled out’ internally within less than a minute.

Harry’s mother had never known how to cope with his self-centred obsession, jealousy of his older brother, the heir to the throne, nor the fact his behaviour was always sel entitled and he lacked the intelligence to accomplish and his mother was constantly being asked by Harry’s school to intervene.

The situation was so complex that Diana was in regular contact with psychiatrists in efforts to control Harry’s temper tantrums and academic failures.

We are fortunate to be rid of Meghan – not because of her colour but because of her undeniable racism and desperate self-serving dishonesty – it is unfortunate but unsurprising Harry marrieds such a woman but as he did we can only consider ourselves fortunate in Britain that they chose to emulate King Edward VIII who before them chose to marry a most inappropriate woman and selected exile in preference to celibacy! It seems likely both marriages were founded on manipulation of weak and unstable men by accomplished women of more than some sexual experience, accomplishment and practice!

There has always been knowledge of Edward’s sexual enthusiasm, and talk of his American divorcee wife who was having a noted relationship with a London car dealer was hardly suited as partner of a Monarch – especially as it was widely claimed she was androgynous and a noted for fellatio!

I leave it for you to speculate on Meghan’s accomplishments though I am only aware of her acting role on cable TV where her CV claimed she was white (at that stage) and her role seemed to be as the only sex feature in an otherwise entertaining legal soap opera!

I wish them both well in America and feel no need to ever hear more of either of them nor do I wish to see or hear of them visiting Britain ever again. Nor such children as they may claim, whether in reality theirs or by surrogacy!

To return briefly to the foolish claim that Richard III was either Black or American clearly, both are obviously wrong and may I remind all and sundry that Blacks existed in tiny numbers in Britain – throughout history, It is true that there were apparently a few who came to Britain during the Roman occupation, as part of the Roman Army. As I am writing, in this instance, for a largely American audience do be minded the Romans never did have much of a Navy, merely transport off our coast – unlike their fighting Navy in the Mediterranean and do remember they had no airforce and fielded few cavalry in Britain. Do note considerably more British youths and young girls were captured by the Romans and sent to Rome for sale as slaves.

Slavery was NEVER legitimised in Britain and perhaps this explains why there were so few blacks, or even coloureds domicile in Britain. It is hard to identify ANY of note or number living in Britain and none were slaves.

The first major influx of Blacks were the Barbary traders, in memory of whom Britain has enshrined The Morris Dancers as part of British Folkdance – with bells, white garb and a percentage of Black Face also sticks replacing the Knobkerry carried as a weapon by the pirates of The Barbary Coast – the custom is in fact dating back to Moorish dancing of the mid 1400s, the first written reference being 1448.

The notoriety of The Moorish traders was based not on their colour, as Britain has ALWAYS been remarkably colou blind until racism became prevallent with the influx of Blacks after WWII, Blacks who tended to Ghettoise from Racial choice, diet and custom forming racist groups and areas.

It is noteworthy that the Moorish Traders were in fact the Barbary Pirates with knobkerry in one hand, vending their goods and purchasing both tin and porcelain clay in large quantities but on their last night they organised a dance of thanks displaying both knobkerry and cutlass and as the locals imbibed more of the alcohol the weapons were seemingly used to abduct young men and women who would be gone, on the ships by morning tide and thus more British were sold as slaves in Africa than ever slaves came to Britain!

It is estimated that some 1.3 Million white slaves were sold on the block in North Africa. Before the banning of slavery by The British in 1807 small parcels of slaves liberated from their black owners and traders who were unfit for shipping to the Americas were brought to health in such as Avonmouth and then sold to cover costs.

Few if any entered any kind of enslavement in Britain and I would hazard a guess that more white slaves are entrapped in the sex trade in Britain nowadays than were ever held as slaves in Britain in the past.

Slave ownership in Britain, South Africa, Canada Empire, which was rigorously enforced by the British Navy and compensation paid by the British Government/Taxpayers after Parliament enacted the ban in 1833 that became effective and enforced by Britain world wide – sadly two elements stood in the way – even perhaps 3!

3 if one considers the American Civil War, which was largely over the legality of slaves in Cotton Growing states!

2. if you consider Britain’s failure to enforce an end to slavery where the captors and owners are largely black, in African states over which Britain had and still has no control , where slavery continues.Primarily the fact that slaves, sold by blacks, to Arabs and other Islamists where little reparations are considered as male slaves were castrated and females who became pregnant were in the main impregnated by their Muslim owners & murdered to avoid inconvenience. Hence there are no descendents to make claims!

1.ALSO we should consider the Indian sub continent where slavery is by caste and indentured labour!

Slavery is not as simplistic as useful idiots like Laura Trevelyan may think with their hard-earned inherited wealth!

Consider: Caribbean country of Grenada urges others to follow example set by former BBC journalist (telegraph.co.uk)

To View the Original Article CLICK HERE

.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
&

ControversiallyGreg@Gmail.com
& follow me on
TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW
& on
PARLER:
https://parler.com/GregLW

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual.
.

Please Be Sure To
Follow me on some other sites
 & spread the facts World Wide

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

Greg Lance – Watkins
GregLW            GL-W
GLW Documents

Climate Change
of Wales & the Welsh
MY PODCASTS
My Health Blog – Cancer etc.
WEF, Agenda 21&30, NWO, UN etc.
&
To SEE Many More

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Regarding TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Greg_LW

From 04-Jul-2022 until Early December 2022:
I was banned from TWITTER.
Allegedly I have broken a TWITTER Rule,
But, Seemingly they lacked the integrity or competence
to identify the rule!
PRESUMABLY I told the Truth or Used a fact
that does not suit their corrupt WOKE agenda,
bias or propaganda!
As the corrupt & biased owners no longer use their lies,
bias & propaganda on Twitter to Un-platform People
& it is no longer owned & managed by them
as Elon Musk has purchased the platform:
I have rejoined by deleting my provably accurate
Tweet:
TWITTER BAN 04-July-2022
Remove Tweet
Tweet 1 of 1
Violating one of our Rules.
Greg_Lance-Watkins
@Greg_LW
They sexualise children as young as 5 at school. But #Prince_Andrew paid £12M for NOT having intercourse with a minor &amp; #Ghislaine got 20yrs. but not a single #Epstein client has been charged, let alone prosecuted! https://t.co/ckGbEMFxVf
Jul 4, 2022, 12:00 PM
By clicking Remove, you are removing the content of your Tweet and all other edited versions of the tweet, and forgoing the option to appeal this violation. Please note that the original content will be replaced with a notice stating your Tweet is no longer available because it violated the Twitter Rules. This notice will be accessible via direct URL and via your profile timeline for 14 days. Learn more.
If you feel that your account has been locked in error, you can appeal by contacting our support team here.

PLEASE NOTE:
Every part of the Tweet is a provable FACT,
the truth seems not to have been popular –
Let us hope Elon Musk’s ownership will lead to greater integrity on Twitter!