DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH< >Side Bars<
& The Top - Below Title
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
PLEASE ACCEPT MY APOLOGY:
For any adverts that may follow this,
in text or at the end
which may well be inappropriate, biased,
propaganda or fraudulent
or even perhaps offensive.
I regret we have no control over adverts
or their number, which may be displayed!
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
OF WALES, THE WELSH REGION & ITS PEOPLES!
The Bullying & Abuse of Whistleblowers in the Welsh Region is all too prevalent! Here is one doctor’s experience: ....
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance – Watkins GregLW GL-W GLW Documents
eMail:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.co & ControversiallyGreg@Gmail.comThe Main Web Site: www.InfoWebSite.UK
follow me on:
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/Greg_LW & https://twitter.com/Controv44553741PARLER: https://parler.com/GregLWFACEBOOK:https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100018379395297
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,
Whistleblowers in Wales: one doctor’s experience:
Whistleblowers are in the news, as Cheshire doctors warning of baby deaths were ignored. The system for whistleblowing in Wales is broken too!!

You may be aware of the whistleblowing doctors who raised concerns about Lucy Letby at the Countess of Chester Hospital, but were ignored or even punished. These types of stories have happened to many of us who worked in Welsh healthcare.
In 2014, I found myself whistleblowing in the Welsh NHS. Let me tell you my story.
Whistleblowers raise concerns
I was a children’s doctor, and I trained in Wales and always worked here. My concerns started around 2008, when funding and staffing for children’s services were reduced. Why are children’s services often the first to be impacted by cuts? I wonder whether it’s because children have a very small political voice?
The day-to-day running of our service slowly deteriorated. By late 2013, the situation was bad. My colleagues were clearly struggling with stress. Our normal team meetings were mostly cancelled. No one was overseeing the work of junior staff. At one point every member of my unit was off on long-term sick leave. Reasons were varied but, knowing them, clearly work-related stress greatly impacted our ability to provide a service.
I had been raising concerns with managers almost daily for around a year. In the Welsh NHS there was an incident reporting system, to which I found myself reporting more and more. No one appeared to be listening. All interactions with management resulted in a somewhat condescending “There, there, we are in the process of change” type of shutdown.
A potentially lethal case triggered me into escalating concerns, but in reality it was just one of many clinical incidents. None had generated a ‘safety first’ response from managers. I contacted my medical insurance society (doctors have to be insured to work in UK hospitals). It appeared I had one option. Officially blow the whistle.
I wrote to management and told them what I was going to do. I then wrote a long email to my MP. It was a relief, as I thought someone somewhere would sort it out.
Little did I know it, but this was to be the suicide note of my career.
Solitary confinement
Soon afterwards I was suspended from clinical duties and placed in professional solitary confinement. I was under investigation (known as WHC/90/22) for an incident that happened long before I was a whistleblower. A professional email of mine had been altered.
If you’re wondering how to change an email (I had to fiddle around to work it out), you just forward it and change it. It’s that simple, but you wouldn’t know how unless shown. I never discovered who changed the email; access to defensive evidence is hard to come by in the NHS. I have my suspicions. Their evidence accused me of breaching patient confidentiality.
I sat in a cell-like room in a faraway unit, told not to talk about the investigation, with little communication from management. My nine-to-five ‘working day’ consisted of having a nap, reading a book, and phoning around to find out what was going on. I was blessed by good union representation with the British Medical Association, which stopped me from resigning. They weren’t able to stop the dodgy investigation or get me out of NHS jail.
When you’re suspended from clinical work, your patients also get suspended. None of my patients were followed up. I recall one who was very unwell, I’d seen her several times a week. She was lost to services when I was suspended. I later tried to find out what happened. I don’t think she was ever seen again.
Around five months later I was told the investigation was over. I was free to resume clinical duties. No further action. But by this point I felt like damaged goods. I had a long and unblemished NHS career before whistleblowing. I’d been prompted to seek promotion. But now I had a big black mark against my name.
The transfer unit
And it didn’t end there. After resuming clinical duties, management continued to gather evidence against me. I was aware another investigation was imminent. I was allocated complex complaint cases. My diary was tampered with, and I wasn’t allocated enough time to complete assessments.
On one occasion I was verbally attacked by a senior clinician, such that colleagues put out an emergency call for assistance. They thought a patient was attacking me. When they realised who was involved they walked away, and later denied seeing anything.
It wasn’t long before I found myself under WHC/90/22 again. Most new allegations were lies, about situations in which I’d been set up to fail. For three years I was kept waiting, frequently contacted about the investigation. Emails were sent at weekends or when I was on annual leave. I was transferred back to the unit where I’d been detained before, but not segregated this time.
The transfer unit was easier to function in. Many there were facing dodgy investigations. I was no longer a pariah, but one of the old lags. We were superficially compliant and worked hard, but privately there was a feeling of anger and disbelief at what was happening. I met another member of staff who’d done professional solitary confinement (it was obviously something management imposed on serious ‘boat rockers’). We’d both been transferred out of our usual units, our colleagues and patients told we were long-term sick.
Even now, when I tell my story, I find people don’t believe me. They want to believe the NHS is honest and ethical. They struggle to believe it’s so unethical and profoundly dishonest, to the point of human rights abuse. Don’t we have a fundamental right to a fair trial? Not in the Welsh NHS. Not in any UK healthcare settings.
Whistleblowers are victims
Being under investigation for over five years took its toll. By the time I was cleared from the second investigation, I was struggling mentally. My ability to function as a medical doctor was gone. I found it hard to cope with an NHS rotten to the core. It was a seismic mental shift that I still struggle with. It was traumatic to find that medically trained colleagues (friends?) were willing to collaborate in the lies to protect their own careers.
Don’t get me wrong, there were many good people. As the saying goes, ‘When your chips are down, you find your friends.” I have sweet memories of colleagues hiding behind doors and bringing me a coffee. I had pieces of potential evidence placed in my inbox. One or two nurses stand out as shining examples of people who put themselves in the line of fire for me. But there were too many who simply looked the other way.
On 31 July 2018 I retired with ill-health: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). My pension was affected. I lost the career I loved and was experienced at. I lost friends.
Why can’t the system call such retirements ‘whistleblower victims’ instead of PTSD sufferers? We are officially labelled as weaklings, too ill to work. I hope one day society will reevaluate and see it differently. Will the Letby case start a new and fairer way of looking at and treating whistleblowing and whistleblowers? Only time will tell.
Damaged goods
Whistleblowers do not get a retirement party. They leave the NHS as damaged goods and pariahs, as snitches. Many describe difficulties in accessing healthcare. Our families have often been profoundly affected. My kids’ teen years were littered with stories of how Mum was being ‘done over’. I have profound guilt about ‘not being there’ to support them through their own crises.
But I coped, and stagger on. There is actually a life after the NHS. I spend a lot of time campaigning for healthcare safety and adequate ‘speak up’ systems in Wales. I work with a group, Do No Harm Wales, which supports Welsh whistleblower victims.
If you’re in Wales and considering becoming a whistleblower, bear in mind that it’s not devolved. You have to blow the whistle specifically to your MP, that’s the law. You can contact a public agency, but the assembly member with the role of health minister isn’t on the list of people you’re officially allowed to whistleblow to.
In my case, the Healthcare Inspectorate in Wales told my manager I’d blown the whistle, causing no end of trouble. So while that’s the official body, would I recommend people approach it? There are support organisations for whistleblowers in England, but in my experience they don’t understand devolved issues, which can do more harm than good.
The system is corrupted and broken. And public interest disclosure isn’t devolved but health is. Work that one out!
I imagine the Letby case has been difficult for all whistleblowers. It’s exposed what most of us have been shouting about for a long time. If I had to sum up the complicated feelings of whistleblowers watching that case very simply, these four words will do.
“WE TOLD YOU SO”.
To View the Original Article CLICK HERE
To View the Original Article CLICK HERE
You will, I am sure, be pleased to know that recently Lisa Peregrine, with her family’s approval provided me with a great deal of documentary evidence in both electronic and paper format, for her own protection as she appreciates that in telling the truth about corruption, bullying and abuse, which is so widespread in the NHS and the Welsh Region we have EVERY reason to believe she has placed herself at risk.
I have 3 copies of both the paper evidence and the electronic material – I am deliberately not holding ANY of the material at my home and can not access ANY of the material without involving at least two other individuals in all 3 instances. IF any member of the Peregrine family comes to any harm or threat or likewise any member of my family the material will, together with much more, be placed in the hands of the media and others who would wish to capitalise on it!

The status of the Lucy Letby inquiry, which will consider how a nurse was able to murder seven babies, has been upgraded to statutory. That is welcome news but, really, it should never have been in any doubt. Heinous attacks were committed against the most vulnerable patients in the care of the National Health Service. Managers at the Countess of Chester hospital were told by paediatricians that something sinister was going on.
A run-of-the-mill inquiry would not have been able to compel witnesses to give evidence under oath. For example, the former £175,000 per annum medical director, Ian Harvey, who has been accused of having “fobbed off” victims’ parents, would have been able to go on residing pleasantly at his French villa, glancing up from his glass of Malbec to issue the standard concerned platitudes. Ah yes, “open, inclusive and transparent”, the three monkeys – see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil – of the morally unaccountable NHS.
Former managers at the Countess of Chester who, according to consultant Dr Stephen Brearey, obliged him and other clinicians to attend mediation with a baby killer, should have no place to hide. But the remit of the inquiry must be far wider than merely adjudicating the bitter war of words between hospital executives and senior doctors.
What the Letby case has revealed is no less than the systematic and deliberate disenfranchisement of the medical profession. As one despairing consultant emailed: “The NHS ‘leadership’ is now staffed predominantly by over-promoted, under-qualified people, especially nurses, but also others with inadequate skills. Many are incompetent bullies (so many bully to hide their incompetence), part of a back-slapping self-congratulatory club which presides over a culture of ‘no bad news’.”
In other words, the brightest, most well-qualified members of staff have to answer to an elite class of numpties which has gained institutional and personal control of the system while rewarding itself with vast salaries, especially for failure. (In fact, technically you can’t really fail if you’re in NHS management; you’re often just moved to another important role where you can fail better.) Incredibly, Tony Chambers, the former CEO at Chester, went on to get three senior NHS jobs after presiding over the Letby calamity.
I asked a current member of staff at the Countess of Chester what Chambers was like. “Total gobshite,” he practically spat. That’s the technical term, I believe. “The number of clueless nonentities in senior positions in NHS trusts is unbelievable,” the medic continued. “They are obsessed with reputational management and preoccupy themselves with empire building, wasting time on the plethora of talking shops and obsess over bureaucracy and process to ensure that, under no circumstances, does anything get done. This all takes place alongside absurd gimmicks and virtue-signalling.”
Paediatricians raised concerns about an unusual number of babies dying on Letby’s shifts and nothing happened for three months. “That’s how they operate,” my source says. “Ask them what day is it tomorrow and they’ll come back to you in two years.”
NHS management is a cult, I have come to realise. They ruthlessly attack any heretics (aka doctors or nurses raising safety concerns) who dare to deviate from the theology of true believers. “They believe they are untouchable,” one doctor says, “because they think the public loves them and politicians daren’t do anything about NHS failure.”
I am not easily shocked, but what I have found out since the Letby verdict about the way the NHS treats whistleblowers has shaken me to the core. One trust chief executive was heard boasting he had £1 million to spend “if consultants raise issues”. A former lawyer who used to work on clinical negligence claims for neonatal deaths and injuries, being brought against her firm’s main client, the NHS, said that cases were deliberately dragged out for as long as a decade with “both sides billing huge sums”. Grieving parents had to fight to get anywhere with discovery (the medical records paid for by you and me, the taxpayer).
“The sheer incompetence of the NHS staff was shocking,” recalls the lawyer, “and there was definitely a culture of cover up.”
How a nurse was able to get away with murdering at least seven babies at the Countess of Chester hospital is a grave matter for the forthcoming inquiry. None graver. But I have been given the names of numerous hospitals, all with equally awful management, where clinicians claim exactly the same thing could happen.
What kind of organisation gets away with an estimated 340,000 of its customers dying on a waiting list while spending millions of customers’ money making sure that failings and negligence never come to light?
Open, inclusive and transparent? Don’t make me laugh. It’s time to bring down the untouchable numptie class of the NHS. If its managers remain untouchable, how long before there’s another Lucy Letby?
To view the original article CLICK HERE
Whistleblowers sacked by NHS fear no change after Lucy Letby case
Two consultants and a junior doctor expect case will make no difference to their separate claims for unfair dismissal
NHS clinicians who were sacked after blowing the whistle about avoidable patient deaths say they fear lessons from the Lucy Letby murder trial have not been learned and the case will make no difference to their own claims for unfair dismissal.
They say hospital bosses are still more concerned about reputation than patient safety, despite what emerged in the Letby case about the tragic consequences of ignoring consultants who first raised suspicions about her killing babies.
Two consultants and a junior doctor who were sacked at different hospitals after raising concerns about patient deaths are challenging their dismissals in the employment courts.

They all predict that the public outcry over the way senior doctors were ignored on Letby will not help their cases despite a public pledge from NHS leaders of better treatment for NHS whistleblowers.
Mansoor Foroughi, a consultant neurosurgeon, was sacked by University Hospital Sussex NHS trust (UHST) in December 2021 for allegedly acting in bad faith when he raised the alarm about 19 deaths and 23 cases of serious patient harm that he said had been covered up in the previous six years. Those deaths and at least 20 others are now being investigated by Sussex police after allegations of medical negligence.
Foroughi, whose appeal against his dismissal is due to be held in the coming months, told the Guardian: “I don’t think mine or anyone’s chances of success has increased [after Letby], and only a change in the law will do that.”
In his first public comments about his plight, he added: “The vast majority of punished employees cannot afford the legal costs involved for any attempt at justice and yet NHS hospital management can use vast amounts of taxpayers’ money to pay incentivised and misguided legal professionals to throw the kitchen sink at the whistleblower behind closed doors.”
A spokesperson for the trust said it could not comment on issues about personnel.
Usha Prasad, a consultant cardiologist, was dismissed by Epsom and St Helier hospitals trust for alleged misconduct. She too ad raised patient safety concerns. These included failures she identified that led to the avoidable death in September 2018 of a 76-year-old man referred to as Mr P.
The trust insists she was dismissed on disciplinary grounds and not whistleblowing. This was upheld by an employment tribunal in 2021 that Prasad is now seeking to appeal.

She said that when the same disciplinary allegations were submitted to the General Medical Council (GMC), it found there was no case to answer.
In documents submitted to a employment tribunal hearing about costs in the case, which was due to be held last week, Prasad claimed she was told to change her report on Mr P’s death to remove a recommendation to refer it to the coroner and the hospital regulator. The trust denies this.
The documents cite the Letby case as highlighting the consequences of “ignoring or punishing those who raise concerns”. The trust has not had a chance to respond to that filing.
Prasad said the way the trust treated her and the costs involve in challenging the employment courts represented a chilling deterrent to those considering raising safety concerns.
She said: “ “I was subjected to dismissal and referral to the GMC. I was very pleased to be exonerated by the GMC following a thorough investigation.”
A trust spokesperson said: “The employment tribunal heard a number of claims by Dr Prasad which they unanimously dismissed, and commented that some of them were ‘completely misconceived’. The employment tribunal will hold a further hearing to decide whether Dr Prasad should pay a contribution towards the trust’s costs.”
It added: “We take patient safety concerns very seriously and encourage everyone who works at the trust to raise issues at every opportunity so we can make improvements to patient care.”
Dr Chris Day has been fighting a long battle with Lewisham and Greenwich NHS trust (LGT) after he raised concerns as a junior doctor about understaffing. He claims he was subjected to a campaign to discredit him resulting in the deletion of his training number, forcing him out of a career.

An appeal is due to be heard in November against an employment tribunal judgment last year that found the trust did not deliberately conceal evidence when hundreds of emails related to his case were deleted by a senior executive.
Day is pessimistic about his chances. He said: “I have had 10 years of it in my own whistleblowing case and I fear nothing will change following Letby. Ten years on and £1m later, the NHS is still fighting me, who raised serious safety concerns about an intensive care unit in London linked to two avoidable deaths.
“The Letby example is an extreme example of the consequences of the NHS’s poor speak-up culture where significant energy and public money is spent on ignoring or covering up difficult truths.”
A spokesperson for LGT said Day’s concerns were taken seriously when they were first raised and it had taken action to ensure employees were “empowered to speak up and are heard when they do”.
They added: “We have made efforts to support Dr Day with his career, via an intermediary, including offering to help him recommence his consultant training with the NHS. He hasn’t yet taken up this offer and has appealed against the most recent judgment in our favour, which unfortunately restricts us from commenting further on the details of his case.”
Prof Philip Banfield, the chair of the British Medical Association’s UK council, said: “We cannot continue with a culture in the NHS that puts the blame on those who raise legitimate concerns and that hounds them out of a career that is their life’s work. Those who speak up with the sole aim of improving patient care and patient safety should be thanked, not ignored, pilloried or persecuted for fulfilling their professional duty.”
To view the original article CLICK HERE
Regards, Greg_L-W.
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337 Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded. Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com& ControversiallyGreg@Gmail.com & follow me on
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/Greg_LW & https://twitter.com/Controv44553741
PARLER: https://parler.com/GregLW
FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100018379395297
Please Be Sure To Follow me on some other sites & spread the facts World Wide
The Main Web Site: www.InfoWebSite.UK
Greg Lance – Watkins GregLW GL-W GLW Documents
Climate Change of Wales & the Welsh MY PODCASTS My Health Blog – Cancer etc. WEF, Agenda 21&30, NWO, UN etc. & To SEE Many More
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Regarding TWITTER: https://twitter.com/Greg_LW
From 04-Jul-2022 until Early December 2022: I was banned from TWITTER. Allegedly I have broken a TWITTER Rule, But, Seemingly they lacked the integrity or competence to identify the rule! PRESUMABLY I told the Truth or Used a fact that does not suit their corrupt WOKE agenda, bias or propaganda!
As the corrupt & biased owners no longer use their lies, bias & propaganda on Twitter to Un-platform People & it is no longer owned & managed by them as Elon Musk has purchased the platform: I have rejoined by deleting my provably accurate Tweet: TWITTER BAN 04-July-2022
Remove Tweet
Tweet 1 of 1
Violating one of our Rules.
Greg_Lance-Watkins @Greg_LW
They sexualise children as young as 5 at school. But #Prince_Andrew paid £12M for NOT having intercourse with a minor & #Ghislaine got 20yrs. but not a single #Epstein client has been charged, let alone prosecuted! https://t.co/ckGbEMFxVf
Jul 4, 2022, 12:00 PM
By clicking Remove, you are removing the content of your Tweet and all other edited versions of the tweet, and forgoing the option to appeal this violation. Please note that the original content will be replaced with a notice stating your Tweet is no longer available because it violated the Twitter Rules. This notice will be accessible via direct URL and via your profile timeline for 14 days. Learn more.
If you feel that your account has been locked in error, you can appeal by contacting our support team here.
PLEASE NOTE: Every part of the Tweet is a provable FACT, the truth seems not to have been popular – Let us hope Elon Musk’s ownership will lead to greater integrity on Twitter!
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/Greg_LW & https://twitter.com/Controv44553741
PARLER: https://parler.com/GregLW FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100018379395297
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~ PLEASE ACCEPT MY APOLOGY: For any adverts that may follow this, in text or at the end which may well be inappropriate, biased, propaganda or fraudulent or even perhaps offensive. I regret we have no control over adverts or their number, which may be displayed! ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~


The Letby inquiry must range wider than her awful murders and investigate a chilling cover-up culture