It Seems our Universities & Educational establishments are increasingly controlled by irresponsible, Neo-Marxist, Criminals but sadly it seems so are some UK Regions eg. Wales, London & Scotland, also Unions, The NHS & more! …
Greg Lance – Watkins
The Main Web Site:
it seems increasingly obvious to me, and it seems to the more enlightened, that education establishments have increasingly lost sight of what they are paid to do!
It seems they think it is thjeir job to politicise and indoctrinate, on a risible and irresponsible WOKE agenda. It is indubitably their responsibility to ensure their students learn HOW to think and make judgements for themselves, appropriate to their age and maturity, and never to do as they seem increasingly to be doing, which is narrowing their perspectives, propagandising and indoctrinating so as to teach them, NOT how to think and learn, research, question and judge but WHAT they MUST think!
That is NOT education that is neo Marxist criminal indoctrination
James Cleverly told of his concern after The Times found that academics have started dropping books from reading lists in case they harm students.
Ten universities, including three from the Russell Group, were discovered to have taken books off reading lists, or made them optional, because of concerns about their content.
“University is about challenging ideas, it is about learning about circumstances beyond your own experience and that includes some very difficult circumstances,” Cleverly told Talk TV.
“I am really concerned about difficult bits of global history being airbrushed out. We can’t just turn life into a Disneyland sanitised version of reality.”
The Times sent freedom of information requests about reading lists to all 140 UK universities. The University of Essex said that the 2017 Pulitzer prize-winning novel The Underground Railroad, by Colson Whitehead, had been removed from a student reading list because of its “graphic description of violence and abuse of slavery”.
The classic play Miss Julie, by August Strindberg, has been withdrawn from a module at the University of Sussex because it includes discussion of suicide. At the University of Aberdeen, English students on a module about Geoffrey Chaucer and medieval writing can opt out of discussions as the course “sometimes entails engagement with topics that you may find emotionally challenging”.
Robert Halfon, the Tory MP for Harlow and chairman of the Commons education committee, said: “We should be encouraging people to read books, even if the subject matter is difficult because that is how we learn.”
Sir Anthony Seldon, the former vice-chancellor of the University of Buckingham, told LBC Radio: “We should be very concerned because universities are all about the discovery of truth. We discover truth by not shutting texts down but by examining them.”
Essex said The Underground Railroad remained available in the university library and is an option for future reading lists. Sussex said Miss Julie was removed from a literature module following student suicides, but staff expected the text to be reinstated. Aberdeen said its content warnings policy enabled staff “to explore controversial topics in an inclusive environment”..
To view the original article CLICK HERE
Here is another facet of that same neo-Marxist, irresponsible, criminal behaviour:
Hard-left academics ‘plotted gender ID witch-hunt’ on colleagues
Staff planned to ‘inform’ on those they believed were transphobic, The Times reveals
A group of hard-left academics has been accused of stifling free speech on university campuses by plotting a witch-hunt against colleagues on gender identity.
University and College Union (UCU) members pledged to compile a list of university backroom staff suspected of holding gender-critical beliefs, the minutes from a meeting leaked to The Times reveal.
The plan was to use this information to “inform” UCU university branches of their colleagues’ views, accusing them of being “transphobes” and “gender-critical activists”.
Academics said members of UCU, the lecturers’ union that represents more than 120,000 academics on UK campuses, were amplifying attacks on gender-critical feminists, with those speaking about sex-based rights compared to Holocaust deniers.
The findings come amid concern that British universities are damaging their reputations by restricting free speech on campuses.
Arguments over gender identity theory — or whether a person’s psychological sense of their gender is at least as relevant as their biological sex — have raged in recent years on campuses.
• Kathleen Stock: Keeping up with the student zeitgeist comes at a high cost
• Read more: Censorship on campus — universities scrap ‘challenging’ books to protect students
• Trevor Phillips: Investigation reveals textbook case of institutional racism
During a UCU meeting in September last year, its LGBT members standing committee agreed to email a survey to LGBT members at universities across the country.
Minutes stated that the survey would “get information about gender critical equality, diversity and inclusion consultants … employed in HR departments of various institutions”.
It suggested that a question could be included in the survey asking: “Are you aware of your institution employing EDI [equality, diversity and inclusion] consultants in the sector and if so which ones.”
The minutes added: “The last question is to get information about how many HR and senior HR staff/consultants are gender critical and then to inform branches, so that they are aware of any problems which may arise in a particular branch.
“Some of the EDI consultants are transphobes and prominent gender critical activists.”
One academic, who spoke anonymously for fear of repercussions, claimed: “These minutes are compelling evidence that UCU is seeking to discriminate against and harass members who believe in sex.”
The Times has not seen the finalised survey sent out to members and the UCU did not provide it.
The UCU said it surveyed its LGBT members as part of its commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion, but did not ask about the views of EDI colleagues at universities.
It did not respond when asked if it had included any questions at all about EDI staff.
A spokesman said: “This survey did not contain any questions about the views, gender critical or otherwise, of senior HR or EDI staff, nor did it ask respondents to identify institutions which employed them. A suggestion to the contrary is untrue.”
He said the UCU was committed to “inclusion and to non-discriminatory conduct at all times”, adding: “UCU is a proud and unequivocal supporter of trans rights, a position established and repeatedly endorsed by members at its annual congress.”
Leaked minutes also reveal the extent to which the UCU’s general secretary, Jo Grady, supported those accused of helping to force out Dr Kathleen Stock from Sussex University.
Grady, 38, a senior lecturer in employment relations at the University of Sheffield, was elected as the UCU’s general secretary in 2019.
She has been bolstered by a new faction of union members — called UCU Commons — branded “hostile to academic freedom”. Three members are on the UCU committee that planned the survey on colleagues’ trans views.
Grady, who earned £140,213 in salary and benefits in 2021, attended a meeting of the same committee in January this year.
The leaked minutes reveal she had met with the University of Sussex’s UCU branch “late last year”, after Stock’s resignation. Instead of backing Stock, the Sussex branch of the UCU called for an investigation into “transphobia” at the university.
During her visit to the branch, Grady “asked them what mechanisms could have been in place which would have benefited them”, the leaked minutes reveal.
They add: “The situation is likely to arise again and it is important to have mechanisms in place to ensure that the situation which the Sussex branch went through is not repeated.”
The anonymous UCU member told The Times: “People had emailed the branch over Kathleen Stock saying: ‘How could you do this?’ This has been reframed by Jo Grady as harassment.”
The LGBT committee meeting, with Grady in attendance, also warned of the need to tackle “transphobes” repeating “hostile views”, in ways other than educating them — suggesting plans to force them out.
The minutes state: “Supporting branches in combating transphobia is important through education but there are a small core of people who are so entrenched in their views and the UCU needs to address this issue … It is important to look at ways of tackling these transphobes as they put forward hostile views which make campuses very unsafe places for trans people.”
The UCU whistleblower told The Times: “That passage made my blood run cold. They mean feminists, like me. There’s no ambiguity — they are talking about their own members. The whole thing is just horrendous.”
The UCU spokesman told The Times: “The whole of the union shared the concerns of Dr Jo Grady about how the UCU Sussex branch was being targeted by the media and others, in some cases with contact details of activists being made public, and it is entirely appropriate to offer support.”
In a video message on social media, Grady accused The Times of harassing and bullying UCU Commons members after we asked them and their universities if they wished to comment. She did not address the issues raised by the leaked minutes.
This year a motion was drafted to the UCU’s national conference saying the Sussex branch should be “congratulated” for its “solidarity” with the student protesters who rallied against Stock. Another motion pledged to “develop resources to support branches to oppose ‘gender critics’”. Both were removed before the conference after legal advice.
Jo Phoenix, 58, a criminology professor who has been researching sex, gender and justice for two decades, resigned from The Open University after being harassed for her gender-critical views and said younger academics feared speaking up.
She told The Times: “In my case, the local union did something very similar to what happened to Kathleen Stock. They sent an ‘all staff’ email which provided a link for an open letter to sign, calling for discrimination against me and my colleagues, and for the university to disaffiliate itself.”
Phoenix said prominent UCU members referred to people who hold gender-critical beliefs as being Holocaust deniers. She believes freedom of speech is under threat on campuses because “you can torpedo someone at a university really easily”.
“Academics being silenced on gender identity is a huge problem,” she said. “We are the outliers — we speak out because we can. Now that we have trade unions who are prepared to sell women’s rights down the river, it is devastating, terrifying and very, very sad.
“What we are seeing is a very high intolerance to academic freedom and plurality of viewpoint. People don’t want to hear what they disagree with.”
The UCU said it was legally unable to comment on matters involving individuals.
A spokesman for the Open University said it was a place of “open debate” where differing and difficult views can be raised, listened to and challenged appropriately.
Shereen Benjamin described herself as a “dyed-in-the-wool trade unionist” — until the union she had devoted much of her academic life to began a “witch-hunt” against her.
The senior lecturer in primary education at the University of Edinburgh terminated her UCU membership last year, accusing colleagues of targeting her for her gender-critical views.
Benjamin, 57, had first come across the gender identity debate in 2018 after standing up for Ann Henderson, the rector at the university. Henderson was abused after calling for a reasoned debate on gender recognition reforms.
Benjamin, a lesbian who was a branch officer for the UCU at the time, said: “I support the rights of trans-identifying people to live in peace, with dignity and respect. But I realised that what some people meant by ‘trans rights’ was an extreme and dogmatic version of gender identity politics.
“I was coming up against an impenetrable wall of: ‘There is no debate, and if you say we should stand up for Ann then you too are transphobic’.”
In 2019 she complained about an email thread on a union activists list which used the acronym ‘Terf’. She was expelled from the mailing list by a circular email with the subject line: “F****** transphobes f*** off!!”
Benjamin went on to organise an event on women’s sex-based rights at her university in June 2019.
The branch president, other branch officers and branch committee members publicly supported a counter-demonstration under the banner: “No Terfs on our turf”.
Benjamin said: “I thought my union — to which I had contributed so much over the years — might be there for me. But there was no support from them.”
Around that time, Benjamin says that advocates of no-debate on gender identity theory were co-opted onto the UCU branch committee without discussion.
In January 2021 following several incidents, including on branch social media, she put in a complaint for bullying and harassment.
It took nearly a year and a half to conclude, by which time the situation within the branch had become irretrievable.
Members of her UCU branch committee submitted a retaliatory complaint against her, claiming she was creating a hostile environment for trans members and their allies, which was dismissed.
Documentation included an email in which some of the complainants had been challenged on their view that Benjamin’s presence on the UCU’s picket line made trans students unsafe.
Benjamin said: “The branch vice-president’s written response was: ‘If a clearly racist member of the union who had arranged events on eugenics or white supremacy was on that picket line, I wouldn’t ask BAME [Black, Asian and minority ethnic] students to go there.”
Of the complaint, she added: “It was a witch-hunt, based on fabrications and distortions and nonsensical allegations.”
Benjamin claims that last autumn she was pre-emptively banned from a workplace Stonewall workshop on account of her gender-critical views. She quit the UCU after it failed to back her challenge to Stonewall’s decision.
She said: “I think it’s a perfect storm in UCU. It’s identity politics in place of class politics.”
Benjamin believes the effect is filtering down into lecture halls, with early-career professors self-censoring in their teaching and research to avoid complaints.
She added: “Lecturers have confided in me that they are scared to teach sex and gender critically, or to prompt students to question and consider alternatives. People are intimidated.
“Academics on lower rungs of the ladder in need of promotion, and those on precarious contracts, need to steer clear of controversies and complaints. Academic freedom and freedom of expression should be front and centre of a union for academics.
“Younger academics desperately need a union that will fight for them when their views conflict with the orthodoxies of the day. Sadly, at the moment, UCU isn’t that union.”
The University of Edinburgh said it was committed to freedom of expression and academic freedom. It said it was the university’s duty to make sure staff and students felt able to discuss controversial topics.
The UCU said it was legally unable to comment on matters involving individuals.
Who’s who in the UCU
Name Dr Chris Grocott
Position Lecturer in management and economic history at the University of Leicester
UCU position UCU Commons; chairman of the universities superannuation scheme advisory board
Quote “I’m a Marxist. I want to see capitalism overthrown.” “We never bend our knee to the Tory bastards.”
Name Dr Jo Edge
Position Post-doctoral research fellow at Edinburgh University
UCU position UCU Commons; chairwoman of the equality committee
Quotes On Kathleen Stock, a feminist philosopher: “Doc Stock OBE is it? Transphobes really aren’t part of the Establishment are they? Fucking sickening.” On gender critics: “It’s like a cult . . . in how seemingly sensible people are drawn into this and within months it’s just constant transphobic shitposting.”
Name Dr Chris Williams
Position Senior history lecturer at the Open University
UCU position UCU Commons
Quote “UCU Commons are very keen on re-imagining the university. We tend to follow the GS’s [general secretary’s] example of gloves-off fighting for achievable goals.”
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
Re-TWEET my Twitterings
My MainWebSite & Blogs
The Main Web Site: