GL-W's weBlog

The views & thoughts of Greg Lance-Watkins & articles & facts I have found interesting.

Now Get Over Yourselves Those Seeking To Damage The Union

Posted by Greg Lance-Watkins on 18/09/2014

.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins – Greg_L-W.

.

Now Get Over Yourselves Those Seeking To Damage The Union

.

Hi,
 
Get Over Yourself, Scotland
Posted: 16/09/2014 17:01 BST Updated: 16/09/2014 17:59 BST
I’m sorry, I’m over this now. I’m tired of all the pandering to Scotland; the appeals from celebrities, the begging from politicians, the dire warnings from big business, the polite nudge from her Majesty the Queen. “Pleeeeease stay with us” has been the hysterical refrain since this all began. Well no more begging, no more dire warnings. I’m sorry, we don’t need to beg. It’s Scotland’s mistake. Let’s be very clear about this: Scotland is having a moment of national madness that it will regret for the foreseeable future. Scotland is sleepwalking into a catastrophic and irreversible decision. And now, after the endless grovelling, I’m inclined to call Scotland’s bluff and say “just go”. Scotland is a country that I adore, but she is letting herself down. Scotland is having a tantrum and behaving like a petulant teenager. And like a petulant teenager, she is neither big nor strong enough to go it alone. Get over yourself Scotland. You are a small country, deal with it.
Don’t get me wrong, by global comparison, England is small too. Wales and Northern Ireland are particularly small. But the key point is this: the United Kingdom is an acceptance of our relative smallness and a symbol of each nation’s humility. It is by definition an admission that we all need each other; that what we have, with all its compromises, is better than any of us going it alone.
What’s so special about Scotland anyway? Well, a lot actually. I think it’s one of the greatest nations in human history. For a small country, it has and continues to contribute a disproportionately large amount to the world. Scotland’s offerings in science, medicine, technology, music, engineering, entertainment and art are unparalleled. That’s not to mention the landscape, the cities, the drinks and the epic women.
But that doesn’t mean you have to break off and go it alone, causing discomfort for your neighbours and unadulterated pain for yourselves. The nationalists boast that Scotland’s contribution to UK GDP is a handsome 9%. That means that 91% of the GDP that Scotland shares with the United Kingdom comes from outside Scotland. And they want to leave? Hmm. Good luck with that. If you were in a partnership with another business and they were bringing in 91% of the turnover and you were bringing in 9%, would you seriously be considering setting up on your own? Particularly if the profits were pooled equally, which in the United Kingdom they are. Every penny the Scots have generated in recent memory has been returned to the nation, via investment and public services.
I just don’t get it. England is the strong partner in this relationship and ought to be clamouring for independence. But there isn’t even a whisper of it. England is the one which could realistically go it alone. The English would benefit hugely from sharing their resources with fewer people and acting in their own national interest. But it’s not on the agenda south of the border. And why? Because England isn’t caught up in some egocentric, poor me, nationalistic fervour that the Scots are currently getting drunk on. The English, the Welsh and the Northern Irish people gloomily and bleakly accept we are better together. It’s like a long marriage. Some of the sparkle may have gone, but you like each other, you have lots in common and you’re in a rare thing – a marriage that works.
I know that’s not very evangelical, but then the United Kingdom is not an evangelical idea. And therein lies its genius. It’s never been ideological or rammed down anyone’s throat. It’s a sensible, practical arrangement, in itself a very British idea. And we can be honest – these islands aren’t the force they once were. But that’s ok. By working as a single entity, Britain has remained a stealth-like economic, military and cultural powerhouse in the world, reflected in its status as the sixth largest economy on the planet and a place the world often looks to for economic, diplomatic or creative inspiration.
The Scots need to look at the English for a moment. England has every right to be up itself. London alone is one hell of a boast; some claim it to be the greatest city in the world. It’s also stable. There is an argument to be made that England is the best integrated multicultural, multiracial society on the planet. Plus there’s Shakespeare, Tim Berners-Lee and The Beatles. But the English don’t do chest-beating, and have never done so. It’s positively frowned upon. I still don’t know when St George’s Day is. England has accepted itself as part of the United Kingdom; she’s left her ego at the door, as have the Welsh, as have Northern Ireland. It’s time for the Scots to do the same.
Calm down and grow up. You are a separate country, you are a proud and great nation, and one of the most fabulous I’ve ever known. I adore Scotland infinitely. I had the happiest four years of my life as an undergraduate at the University of Edinburgh, a prettier more culturally rich city you’ll struggle to find. I owe Scotland my entire higher education and it pains me to see her make such an uneducated decision; Edinburgh itself is a seat of learning, not rampant, unguarded national emotion. Of course there are tensions and a careful redrawing of the economic and political boundaries for each nation are long overdue; devo-max, which sounds like a treatment for indigestion, looks to be an eminently sensible idea. We should definitely hand over new powers, so Scotland has a far greater say over how it is run. That would be good for England, Wales and NI too. But let’s not throw the bairn out with the bath water. Let’s not cut off our sporran to spite our kilt.
So Scotland, I implore you. Sober up, so we can drink together again. Four fine nations, pooling our collective resources and talent for the greater good. The good of Great Britain. Our country, that we all share. Come back to the party Scotland. And please, don’t make me beg.
 
Good luck Scotland a minnow in the ocean full of sharks where the gullible bay and bray in strident self loathing for a fake independence desperate for the jobs and hand outs they hope to get from enemies of the UK for their survival!
 
Listening to the lies of Alex Salmon the SNP and a rag bag of assorted nobodies on the world stage – dependent on a few actors doing what actors do and delivering lines supplied for them to raise their profile from insignificance to ego fed importance in their own lunch time!
 
Grants are now the sole remaining Scottish owned whiskey producer in Scotland – not a single oil company of any size or stature has it base in Scotland – Scottish ship building is dependent on UK defence and UK contracts, Scotland would be dependent on UK control of its economy without a say if it uses the Pound, Scotland’s wind and solar energy is dependent on UK subsidies, whilst farmers largely vote No crofters dependent on subsiiiideez may well vote to sever the hand that feeds them and how will Scotland fund its over large public service sector without a major finance industry which it hasn’t got when even RBS is planning to relocate its head occice south iof there is a yes vote!
 
18 Million Scots around the world have no say whilst there are enough Romanians, Poles, Pakistanis, Indians, Germans, Dutch and the like to vote in hatred against the UK!
 
With a Yes vote Scotland’s demographic with a rapidy ageing population will be unable to fund its pensions without opening the flood gates to third world immigrants who will overrun the indigenous population of 5 million, and to prevent the drift south of these immigrants a rigid border will be inevitable, with control of anyone from Scotland to prevent them working & living in the south!
 

Good luck Scotland I hope you survive the immense damage done by Alex Salmond & the SNP where whether it is a Yes or No vote their strident bickering and abusive behaviour and self interested dishonesty has done more damage to these United Kingdoms than ISIS has or is ever likely to!

It is and has been my prediction for some time that sanity will prevail in Scotland and I fervently hope, not just for Scotland’s sake but for all of us in these United Kingdoms, that the vote will provide an 8% lead for No, as due to the bullying and abusive style of those seeking to damage the Union have felt unsafe to openly declare their vote, based upon patriotic common sense.

Part of the damage done by Alex Salmond, the SNP and the rump of the UK that has camp[aigned for and voted Yes for the destruction of these United Kingdoms reflecting their myopic introspection and hatred that would most certainly have proved catastrophic for Scotland and very damaging and costly for the rest of the UK as was all too presciently predicted in Judy Magazine in the 1800s!

As I published some 15 years ago and can be found in context in 2009 on my http://Ukip-vs-EUkip.com

TEN LITTLE KINGDOMS

One great thing about having a book shop is all of human knowledge and most thought is printed somewhere and when you miss reading it yourself someone points it out to you!

I am not normally an avid reader of ‘Judy’ Magazine for girls of the 1880s but I could be converted – here is a poem from the 28th. August 1889 which shows that little is new.

Please print this out and give out as many copies as you can afford to.

TEN LITTLE KINGDOMS
by: Miss J.E. Clarke of Eynsham

Plans for seperation grew worse
than those before,
Then they asked for two Parliaments,
now ’tis three or four.
Only just imagine if Home Rulers
had their way,
And this is something like the tale
the world might hear one day.
“One United Kingdom they fancied
wouldn’t do.
To please some grumbling Irish
they split it into two.
Two little kingdoms, but then the
Scots, you see,
Claimed their ancient throne and
rights, and then there were three.
Three little Kingdoms, and after
that one more,
For Welshmen claimed a parliament,
and then there were four.
Four little Kingdoms wouldn’t do
at all!
One of them was far too big; the
others far too small.
All throughout Great Britain ancient
hates revived.
Cornwall wants to rule herself, and
then there were five.
Five little Kingdoms, but London
in a fix,
Raised the ‘Southern English’ flag,
and then there were six.
Six little Kingdoms, alas! the ‘Home
Rule’ heaven,
Caused a rising in the West, and
then there were seven.
Seven little Kingdoms; Northmen
wouldn’t wait,
But started the Northumbrian state,
and then there were eight.
And the towns that one may visit
by the Eastern Counties line,
Held their own East Anglian Parliament
and then there were nine.
Nine little Kingdoms; the Midlands
people then
Called a parliament themselves,
and then there were ten.
Ten little Kingdoms never could
agree
How to work together, and so
they went free.
Ten little Kingdoms with constitutions
new,
Ten little Kingdoms always in a
stew,
Ten little Kingdoms too weak to
stand alone,
A foreign nation conquered them,
and now there were none.

The [EU] ‘Regional Policy’ was again published as a method of breaking up Britain into ‘squabbling’ little Assembly Regions of insufficient stature, to ensure dependence on the centre. Each little Region being in conflict and competition with its neighbour, leading to a loss of National identity and a need for subsidy from the centre.

To read the rest of the article in context CLICK HERE

.
Regards,

Greg_L-W.
.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337 -
number witheld calls are blocked & calls are recorded.

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS, >SEARCH< & >Side Bars< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’ archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General ‘Stuff’ ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com

Skype: GregL-W

TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU
  
 

Posted in Alex Salmond, Scotland, Scottish independence, SNP, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Viewing An American Outlook On Islam & Muslims

Posted by Greg Lance-Watkins on 16/09/2014

.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins – Greg_L-W.

.

Viewing An American Outlook On Islam & Muslims

 

 

Islam

islam Religion of TerrorThis page contains the links to all the posts CODA has published on Islam.

“Reaction to Obama’s ISIL counterterrorism policy speech,” Sept. 14, 2014.“Obama announces U.S. ‘counterterrorism’ policy against ISIL,” Sept. 11, 2014.

73% of U.S. voters worried about Obama’s lack of strategy for ISIS,” Sept. 3, 2014.

 

“Foreign jihadists: countries of origin and why they join,” Sept. 2, 2014.

France submits to Islam: 70% expect country to become Islamic,” Aug. 29, 2014.

Terrorism waiting to happen: Obama admin ignores Congress in lifting 30-yr. ban on Libyans training in U.S. flight schools,” Aug. 22, 2014.

“Rockets fired by Hamas at Israel sometimes land in Gaza, killing Palestinian civilians,” Aug. 3, 2014.

While Nancy Pelosi calls Hamas a ‘humanitarian organization,’ Egyptian media applaud Israel for its war on Hamas,” Aug. 1, 2014.

Hamas’ objective: Get Israel to kill as many Palestinians as possible,” July 30, 2014.

Israel’s Iron Dome missile shield intercepts 90% of Hamas’ rockets,” July 28, 2014.

A sober look at ISIS’s declaration of a pan-Islamic state or caliphate,” July 4, 2014.

Obama admin’s secret war: 120 U.S. troops in Somalia,” July 3, 2014.

No good options for Obama as Iran and Russia jump into Iraq,” July 1, 2014.

ISIS announces Islamic caliphate is a reality,” June 30, 2014.

Obama admin trained ISIS jihadists in 2012,” June 19, 2014.

ISIS: the savage jihadists laying waste to Iraq,” June 15, 2014.

Obama ignored advice of military & CIA against Bergdahl prisoner swap,” June 9, 2014.

White House accidentally exposed identity of top CIA officer in Afghanistan,” May 26, 2014.

Obama administration refuses to tell Congress with whom U.S. is at war,” May 23, 2014.

Obama administration’s DHS has a list of ‘hands off’ terrorists allowed to enter U.S.,” May 20, 2014.

Al Qaeda calls for car bomb attacks in U.S. cities,” May 9, 2014.

Texas police officers are members of Mahmoudberg jihadist compound,” Feb. 23, 2014.

Egypt arrests U.S. embassy employee, member of Muslim Brotherhood,” Feb. 12, 2014.

Terrorists target America’s forests, reservoirs, and power grid,” Feb. 6, 2014.

Attack on California power station an act of terrorism,” Feb. 5, 2014.

Archbishop warns there are no “moderate” Syrian rebels,” Jan. 10, 2014.

US sends missiles and drones to fight al-Qaeda in Iraq,” Dec. 28, 2013.

FBI: Americans joining Syria’s jihadists,” Dec. 21, 2013.

Insanity: Obama admin considering closer ties with Syrian jihadists,” Dec. 17, 2013.

Origins of the Syrian Civil War,” Dec. 11, 2013.

Pulitzer-award journalist says Obama admin made up intelligence for war on Syria,” Dec. 9, 2013.

The Iran “deal” summarized,” Dec. 1, 2013.

New rules of engagement hamstring U.S. troops in Afghan war,” Nov. 30, 2013.

Afghanistan to reintroduce stoning for adultery,” Nov. 25, 2013.

Somali jihadists al-Shabab revives, renews attack,” Nov. 21, 2013.

Elephants near extinction: Muslim jihadists profit from poaching fueled by Chinese buyers,” Nov. 15, 2013.

Syrian Muslims infected with Kuru, a disease of cannibals,” Nov. 12, 2013.

U.S. imam: Muslims can take the property of Christians and Jews,” Nov. 9, 2013.

Forensic tests show Yasser Arafat was poisoned with radioactive polonium,” Nov. 7, 2013.

In reversal, Obama says he will boost US military support in Iraq,” Nov. 6, 2013.

US, NATO warn Turkey: Chinese-built air defense system not interoperable with NATO’s,” Nov. 5, 2013.

Al-Shabab jihadists recruit Somali youth in Minnesota,” Oct. 19, 2013.

NATO ally Turkey betrays 10 Iranian-Israeli agents to Iran,” Oct. 18, 2013.

Russia’s mounting internal crisis: declining population, radical Muslims, and China,” Oct. 14, 2013.

Iran claims its long-range missiles can reach Israel and U.S. bases in Gulf,” Oct. 14, 2013.

Iran claims its drones can fly deep into Israel,” Oct. 11, 2013.

Why is the U.S. National Park Service extolling Islam in a video?,” Oct. 11, 2013.

Global Jihad: Turkish jihadists join Syria’s civil war,” Oct. 9, 2013.

Obama and Congress may have created in Syria most deadly Islamic movement since 1990s,” Oct. 9, 2013.

Actual footage of 1993 Black Hawk down,” Oct. 8, 2013.

Get Your Programs Here, Can’t Tell Your Bad Guys Without Your Program,” Oct. 6, 2013.

Turkey selects China to build “stand-alone” air defense system,” Oct. 6, 2013.

CIA expands Obama-approved training of Syrian militants,” Oct. 4, 2o13.

Al-Shabab: Jihadist terrorists who attacked a Nairobi shopping mall,” Sept. 24, 2013.

Pakistani Taliban joining jihadist “rebels” in Syria civil war,” Sept. 24, 2013.

“Iraq, once again, is spiraling into out-of-control violence,” Sept. 23, 2013.

Al Qaeda leader, assassinated by U.S. drone, was invited guest at DOD luncheon in 2002,” Sept. 17, 2013.

.
Regards,

Greg_L-W.
.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337 -
number witheld calls are blocked & calls are recorded.

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS, >SEARCH< & >Side Bars< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’ archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General ‘Stuff’ ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com

Skype: GregL-W

TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU
  
 

Posted in Islam, Muslim, Uncategorized, USA, ZIONIST | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The Defeat of Japan More Absolute Today than 14-Sep-1945

Posted by Greg Lance-Watkins on 15/09/2014

.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins – Greg_L-W.

.

The Iminent Defeat of Japan is More Absolute Today than it was on 14-Sep-1945

.

Japan’s demographics spell doom

Ups and downs: Working age population projection by Japan's National Institute of Population and Social Security ResearchJapan’s National Institute of Population and Social Security Research

International investor and entrepreneur Simon Black of Sovereign Man writes, Sept. 15, 2014:

One in eight Japanese is aged 75 or older. People over 65 will reach 33 million, the largest ever, roughly 25.9% of the population.

The thing about demographic trends is that they’re like a huge oil tanker—once they’re on their course it’s very hard to steer them around in another direction.

These are monumental, generational changes that are very hard and slow to reverse.

By today’s trend, Japan’s population will dwindle from 127 million today to around 100 million by 2050. It’s the worst possible demographic nightmare.

People stopped having as many babies decades ago. It was too damned expensive.

Then the big collapse came in the late 80s, and the economy has been dragging it heels ever since.

When prosperity is low, people consequently delay having children. They have fewer children. Or they don’t have them at all.

This has enormous long-term implications for the country and its fundamentals. Fewer people of working age means fewer jobs, less productivity, less consumption and less government tax revenue.

On the other hand, a bulging group of older people means more spending for medical care and pensions.

In the recently proposed budget for fiscal year 2015, the Japanese government earmarked 31.7 trillion yen for social security, welfare and health spending.

This is the largest item in the budget, consuming 31.2% of all planned government spending.

And it’s only getting larger.

It doesn’t help that Japan is essentially already bankrupt.

The second largest item in Japanese government’s budget is interest.

While social security, welfare and health spending has increased by 3% from the current budget, debt servicing is up by 11% and now amounts to 25.8 trillion yen, or an incredible 25% of Japan’s budget.

So just between pensions and interest, they’re spending 57.5 trillion yen. Last year they only collected 50 trillion in tax revenue.

So before they spend a single yen on anything else in government… anything at all… they’re already 7 trillion yen (about $70 billion) in the hole. They have to borrow the rest.

English: Graph showing National Debt of Japan ...

English: Graph showing National Debt of Japan from April, 1982. “兆円” is 1 Trillion Yen. 日本語: 1982年4月以降の日本の国債残高。 LEGEND, 凡例 – Domestic bonds, 内国債 – Foreign bonds, 外国債 – Financing bills, 短期証券 – Borrowings, 借入金 – Temporary borrowings, 一時借入金 – 12 month avg., 過去12ヶ月の平均 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Bear in mind, this is coming at a time when interest rates for 10-year Japanese bonds are 0.5%, and even closer to zero on shorter notes.

If interest rates rise to just 1%, which is historically still very low, Japan will spend almost all of its tax revenue just to service the debt!

You can’t make this stuff up. It’s a screaming indicator that this system can’t possibly last.

Europe, the US and Japan, three of the biggest economies in the world, are all on a similar inevitable trend—they’re in debt up to their eyeballs, with absolutely no arithmetic possibility of ever getting out of the hole unscathed.

Japan is just worst of them all.

And history is so full of examples of what governments do when countries get into this position: as reality beckons, they become even more careless and destructive.

Meanwhile, researchers found that young Japanese not just shun the idea of marriage and having children, they increasingly are asexual. More than 25% of unmarried men and women in their late 30s have never had sex.

Add to all this the following doleful statistics from Wikipedia:

Suicide is the leading cause of death for Japanese under 30. In 2009, the number of suicides exceeded 30,000 for the twelfth straight year.

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE

.
Regards,

Greg_L-W.
.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337 -
number witheld calls are blocked & calls are recorded.

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS, >SEARCH< & >Side Bars< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’ archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General ‘Stuff’ ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com

Skype: GregL-W

TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU
  
 

Posted in Japan, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The Risks & Duplicity In a Referendum on EU Membership.

Posted by Greg Lance-Watkins on 31/08/2014

.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins – Greg_L-W.

.The Risks & Duplicity In a Referendum on EU Membership.

 

If Dave and his pals are our ‘clever elite’ why does Nigel make them look so stupid?

By Peter Hitchens

The only interesting things about Douglas Carswell’s switch from the Tory Party to Ukip are that it took him so long and that he has acted alone. Any thinking person has been able to see for years that the Tory Party hates conservatives. It is a roadblock, not a road, championing the elite against the people.

It is kept in being only by the BBC and various dodgy billionaires, who provide it with airtime and money out of all proportion to its real support. It has no actual aims except office at all costs.

It has no actual policies either, only negative smear campaigns, falsely portraying Ukip as mad Nazis, or Ed Miliband as some kind of Trotskyist loony.

Scroll down for video

 
Laughing all the way: Even Nigel Farage has more of a clue about how the world works than our supposedly clever elite, writes Hitchens

Laughing all the way: Even Nigel Farage has more of a clue about how the world works than our supposedly clever elite, writes Hitchens

The party leader has never pretended to be anything other than he is – the heir to Blair. That is why so much of the Left-wing media prefer David Cameron to Ed Miliband.

Mr Cameron’s promise of a referendum on EU membership is worthless three times over. First, nobody can rely on his word after his broken promise to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.

Second, Mr Cameron could  not win a Westminster majority in 2010, and there is even less chance of his doing so next May, as he well knows. He could promise paradise and be sure he would never have to deliver it. 

 
Conservative MP Douglas Carswell has defected to UKIP
 

Third, does anyone seriously think that a referendum on EU membership could be or would  be conducted fairly in a country whose main source of news is the BBC, and whose whole media establishment is pro-EU?

As I write, I have in front of me the sad relics of the 1975 referendum on the same subject. I had a narrow escape. I had meant to vote to stay in. But I voted ‘No’  (to leave) after my officially impartial local newspaper delayed a story I had written on the eve of the vote because it would have harmed the ‘Yes’ campaign.

Months of brainwashing were cancelled out by this sharp personal experience of the ‘Yes’ campaign’s instinctive and necessary dishonesty. If it didn’t lie about its real aims, it would never get any support. The whole thing was rigged from the start (as Mr Cameron’s would be).

There are no laws to stop this. In 1975, the state used taxes to pay for and send out two pamphlets urging a ‘stay in’ vote – one from the Government and one from  the ‘Yes’ campaign’ – but only one from the ‘No’ campaign.

Read them now and the ‘Yes’ material is often dishonest drivel, including a false claim that the threat of economic and monetary union ‘has been removed’. Not exactly. The ‘No’ pamphlet, by contrast, is prophetic and truthful.

But in 1975, nobody foresaw that the EU would one day abolish British passports and force us to throw open our borders to legions of low-paid workers from the former communist bloc. Nor could they have known that the EU would be aggressively fomenting a new war with Russia, using our money to do so.

Brussels distributed more than £300 million of taxpayers’ money in Ukraine between 2007 and 2013. It went to all kinds of lucky recipients, so it is no great surprise that Kiev blossomed with EU flags last winter during the violent mob putsch which so many idiots in the West supported.

They were generally the same idiots who supported the ‘Arab Spring’, and so helped plunge Libya and Syria into a sea of blood and fire, and to launch ‘Islamic State’. Now these idiots are well  on the way to starting the biggest European war since 1945, and are busy blaming Russia for having the effrontery to defend itself against this blatant aggression.

It really is time that we understood that those in charge of this country have no idea what they are doing. Even Nigel Farage has more of a clue about how the world works than our supposedly clever elite.

And yet those who could make a difference still cling to the Tory nurse for fear of finding something worse. Well, what could be worse than bankruptcy, uncontrolled mass immigration and war?

To view the original article CLICK HERE
Sadly based upon my own experience and research on this subject I incline to agree with Peter Hitchen’s comments on this issue.
However I would draw your attention to the fact that David Cameron did NOT promise a referendum on the EU’s new constitution subsequently renamed, for the purposes of obfuscation, The Lisbon Treaty – his promise of a referendum for the British peoples was duplicitously promised based on the condition that the treaty had not been signed when he came to power; a promise he must surely have known would never have to be honoured!
You will also note that Nigel Farage and his cult followers in Ukip made virtually no effort to oppose the Lisbon Treaty in Britain or Brussels prior to its being signed; many will recall Farage spent his time swanning around in Ireland aiding associates, seeking to gain the backing of Declan Ganley it seemed; sheltering behind their claim that the Tories were doing the work to oppose it – They were not!
There is every reason to believe that even without direct lies from the largely self serving political elite in Britain it is likely that ignorance on the part of the electorate and biased media coverage using innuendo and F.U.D. would ensure that Britain would vote for its own continued destruction – just as there is every possibility the Scots will vote for their own destruction with a Yes vote injust a few days time, on the 18-Sep-2014.
Sadly the concept of ‘One man one vote’ in a so called democracy most clearly leads automatically to ‘Rule by The Fool’!
It is also worth responding to Peter Hitchen’s simplistic question
‘If Dave and his pals are our ‘clever elite’ why does Nigel make them look so stupid?’
Hitchens clearly chooses to overlook just how easy it is to look good as a showman and populist when pandering to the lowest levels as a critic in opposition with a huge budget funded by the tax payer to the tune of £Millions!
It is an entirely different matter when one has to act with measured gravitas and actually represent ones country on an accountable basis with its downside risks!

.
Regards,

Greg_L-W.
.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337 -
number witheld calls are blocked & calls are recorded.

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS, >SEARCH< & >Side Bars< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’ archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General ‘Stuff’ ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com

Skype: GregL-W

TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU
  
 

Posted in Nigel Farage, Peter Hitchens, REFERENDUM, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Marc DuTroux & Organised & Institutionalised Depravity

Posted by Greg Lance-Watkins on 13/08/2014

Marc DuTroux & Organised & Institutionalised Depravity

.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins – Greg_L-W.

Marc DuTroux & Organised & Institutionalised Depravity

.

Hi,

I was recently provided with this following information from the internet from an anonymised source.

I can NOT vouchsafe either the source nor the accuracy of the details and most clearly not the links given BUT after reading the document and following several of the links I find it to seem to be accurate and informed, in accord with other reading and research I have carried out relative to Marc DuTroux and his associated paedophile and trafficking activities and his associates.

I thank both the anonymous supplier of the material to me and the compiler of this dossier, who may or may not be one and the same.

I reproduce the material here as I believe it deserves the very widest of audiences minded of the caveat that I do NOT vouch for the veracity of the material though believ it to be largely true and accurate and for that reason I pass it on in good faith.

Greg_L-W.

Wikipedia entry on Marc Dutroux: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Dutroux (read especially about the parts in “failures of the system”).

Marc Dutroux is a Belgian convicted pedophile rapist and (serial?) killer, now confined to prison for life. What is strange is that there were numerous allegations of a network/ring, with elite people in Belgium, even in France and the Netherlands alleged to be perpetrators (witnesses and others allege). The Belgian police and judicial authorities made many, many “blunders” in investigations (as well as not investigating incriminating and obvious leads, evidence, etc, such as hairs not being tested, DNA results not being shown, tip offs ignored by police, judges and others who were investigating a possible ring were sacked, as well as more than twenty witnesses and other informants who died mysteriously right before going forward with evidence; one person who was officially labeled as dying from a heart attack was in fact shown to have been poisoned, others threatened with murders and “accidents”, lots of witnesses committing “suicide”, all right before giving evidence to police). The investigative judge, Connerotte, who rescued two of the raped girls who were kidnapped by Dutroux and his accomplices, was sacked because he believed there was a gang or mafia related pedophile ring that reached high levels of elite. Lots of evidence and facts point that there is a pedophile ring, with Michel Nihoul being a possible ringleader. Nihoul and others have enjoyed a lot of protection from the government.

Another very strange thing is the fact that Dutroux had already been a convicted rapist in the 80s, after raping at least 5 children (girls). He only served a mere few years out of 12 years. Shortly after getting out, in the early 90s, he was at it again, and allegedly selling girls abroad, to other traffickers. He constructed an elaborate cell, dungeon, in which he raped and held girls. What is very strange is that he was released so early for the rape of 5 children, and that police already had him on a suspect list and yet when children went missing, of which he was named a possible suspect, he was not investigated for over a year, even after tip offs (from his mother, that he was holding girls at his house, and other tips). The police eventually went there, and heard sounds of children shouting (which were actually the victims), but accepted Dutroux’s excuse that the sounds were just children playing outside, while knowing this guy was already a convicted child rapist and suspect and they had already received tip-offs at that point. But oh, no, they “couldn’t” search for or find them. While the police were there, Dutroux in fact had two girls hostage in his underground, hidden dungeon cell. When the girls were finally found, later, it was too late and they were dead. Two more were found buried in his garden, they had been raped and buried alive. Two girls were freed, alive, but had been raped: Sabinne Dardenne and Laetitia Delhez.

Dutroux already had criminal ties to Michel Nihoul (car thefts and drug trafficking in Belgium and to Eastern Europe<– red flag! they may have known sex trafficking connections), a businessman and pedophile, who organized orgy parties of which high level people too part of (police, judges, EU politician, etc), and in which witnesses say children were raped. Witnesses also say there were sadomasochistic rapes and even murders done, that Nihoul organized or was a part of, and in which a younger Dutroux was a part of as well. There were tapes found at one of Dutroux’s 7 houses, one of which shows Dutroux raping a child in Slovakia, and pornographic pictures of gypsy children. Witnesses said that Dutroux and Nihoul and the ring had plans of trafficking children to and from Eastern Europe.

Here is what Connerote, the initial investigative judge in the case, who rescued the two live girls, said about being threatened because of the truth being suppressed:

“On the witness stand, Jean-Marc Connerotte, the original judge of the case, broke down in tears when he described “the bullet-proof vehicles and armed guards needed to protect him against the shadowy figures determined to stop the full truth coming out. Never before in Belgium has an investigating judge at the service of the king been subjected to such pressure. We were told by police that [murder] contracts had been taken out against the magistrates.” Connerotte testified that the investigation was seriously hampered by protection of suspects by people in the government. “Rarely has so much energy been spent opposing an inquiry,” he said. He believed that the Mafia had taken control of the case.[6]
from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Dutroux#Allegations_of_massive_cover-up

The Belgian people were so frustrated at the failing judicial and law enforcement systems that they, along with the victims’ parents, protested: more than 300,000 Belgians protested in their capital, Brussels, in what was called the White March: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_March

Please read:
BBC: Belgian Sex Ring Ignored: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1774436.stm

BBC: “Authorities in Belgium are trying to prevent the circulation of a list of suspected or convicted paedophiles”: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/874363.stm

To learn about this case, here is a documentary by Olenka Frenkiel, a British journalist:

Belgium’s X Files. An Olenka Frenkiel investigation

Here are some more news sources:

Here is a 1235-paged document WikiLeaks released in 2009, although it is in French (I will be working on translating this, if any others want to as well, that would be great!). There are testimonies of witnesses and connections and facts written in it, some rather shocking:

Belgium: Dutroux dossier summary, 1235 pages, 2005

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Belgium:_Dutroux_dossier_summary,_1235_pages,_2005

What is going on in the nation in which the European Union and NATO are headquartered? The truth that has been suppressed needs to come out.

« Last Edit: November 24, 2012, 04:26:46 AM by Arduenna silva »
“The Brotherhood cannot be wiped out because it is not an organisation in the ordinary sense. Nothing holds it together except an idea which is indestructible.” -1984

I am not “Emmanuel Goldstein” of the magazine 2600. My username is derived from 1984.


Offline EmmanuelGoldstein⌛

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Reputation 32
Warning: the following post may be triggering/upsetting

Belgians furious as child killer Marc Dutroux’s wife Michelle Martin is freed
AP | Wednesday 29 August 2012

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/belgians-furious-as-child-killer-marc-dutrouxs-wife-michelle-martin-is-freed-8091716.html

A woman who let two eight-year-old girls starve in a cellar and helped her paedophile husband carry out horrific abuse of others went from prison to a convent amid outrage from Belgians over the early release of one of the country’s most despised criminals.

The nation’s highest court approved Michelle Martin’s release after she served 16 years of a 30-year prison term for her role in the mid-1990s kidnappings, rapes and killings by her then-husband Marc Dutroux.

Martin left prison in an unmarked vehicle for a Clarisse convent in Malonne, a 45-mile trip south of the capital Brussels, where her lawyer said she would seek atonement for her crimes. More than 100 people hurled insults at her as she arrived, some trying to break through police barriers.

“There is only one word for this. This is simply absurd. But I will have to accept it,” said Paul Marchal, whose daughter An was one of Dutroux’s victims. “Concerning Martin, my fight is over and done. I lost.” [emphasis mine[/b]

Martin’s lawyer, Thierry Moreau, insisted that his 52-year-old client deserved a shot at a better life.

“There is something human remaining in Mrs Martin, even though she acknowledges herself she is responsible for very serious acts,” Mr Moreau said.

“She paid the price for it. She did it in respect of the law, and now there is this project where she wants to redeem herself and this will be another way to do her sentence.”

The Dutroux case horrified the nation and led to widespread changes in Belgian police procedures. Police had visited the home twice in the mid-1990s and did not find the kidnapped girls, although they heard voices, and ignored a letter from Dutroux’s mother that expressed concern her son was abusing young girls.

Dutroux, an unemployed electrician and convicted paedophile on parole at the time of the crimes, was arrested in 1996 and convicted eight years later of abducting, imprisoning and raping six girls between the summers of 1995 and 1996. He was also found guilty of murdering two of the six girls, aged eight to 19.

The last two of Dutroux’s kidnap victims were found alive in his basement a few days after his arrest.

Martin was accused of conspiracy in the kidnappings and imprisonment leading to the deaths of the two starved girls, who were held in a secret dungeon specially built in a cellar. Martin said she had been too scared to go into the cellar to feed them while Dutroux was serving a four-month jail term for car theft.

A year after they were kidnapped, the bodies of the two were found in the garden of a house that Dutroux owned.

Martin has depicted herself as a passive culprit of psychopath Dutroux, but was blamed for aiding her husband when he went on a depraved and murderous spree and letting the young girls die.

The prospect of her release had spawned demonstrations in the past few weeks, with demands to keep her in jail.

Several policemen were stationed near the convent even before the verdict was announced and fluorescent graffiti nearby protesting at Martin’s arrival was removed.

At a religious statue near the gate, teddy bears sat next to a picture of the two eight-year-old girls who starved to death in Dutroux’s dungeon in 1996.

The lawyer for Jean-Denis Lejeune, whose daughter Julie was one of the girls who starved to death, said the families would work to change the law that allowed Martin’s early release and make sure victims get a bigger say how long convicted criminals have to stay behind bars.

“We will first have to ask the politicians to change the law and, secondly, we will have to go to Strasbourg,” where the European Court of Human Rights can still have an impact, said lawyer Georges-Henri Beauthier.

That process could take years, however.

Neighbours of the convent worried about Martin’s influence. A children’s school is close by.

“My children are studying here,” said Malonne resident Fabienne Huboaux. “We are afraid, afraid to see what is going to happen with them when they are going to go to class.”

« Last Edit: November 24, 2012, 04:26:51 AM by Arduenna silva »
“The Brotherhood cannot be wiped out because it is not an organisation in the ordinary sense. Nothing holds it together except an idea which is indestructible.” -1984

I am not “Emmanuel Goldstein” of the magazine 2600. My username is derived from 1984.


Offline EmmanuelGoldstein⌛

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Reputation 32
Real Crime: The Perverted World of Marc Dutroux
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2012, 23:51:09 PM »
Warning: the following may be triggering/upsetting

I highly recommend this documentary, very informative and compelling:

Real Crime: The Perverted World of Marc Dutroux

« Last Edit: November 24, 2012, 04:28:47 AM by Arduenna silva »
“The Brotherhood cannot be wiped out because it is not an organisation in the ordinary sense. Nothing holds it together except an idea which is indestructible.” -1984

I am not “Emmanuel Goldstein” of the magazine 2600. My username is derived from 1984.


TrxiZ

  • Guest
Emanuel, do you need help with the translation, maybe some tranlators can help us/ you to translate the file :)

Offline EmmanuelGoldstein⌛

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Reputation 32

Emanuel, do you need help with the translation, maybe some tranlators can help us/ you to translate the file :)

Oh my goodnesss…thank you so much T!!! That will definitely help! :D

“The Brotherhood cannot be wiped out because it is not an organisation in the ordinary sense. Nothing holds it together except an idea which is indestructible.” -1984

I am not “Emmanuel Goldstein” of the magazine 2600. My username is derived from 1984.


TrxiZ

  • Guest
We are on it ;)

Offline EmmanuelGoldstein⌛

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Reputation 32
The sinister Marc Dutroux cover-up
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2012, 06:22:52 AM »
I’ve checked this page and it is indeed true according to the facts. One of the reasons why I and countless others believe this case needs to be reopen and is still relevant today is due to the fact that many people involved in the case (Nihoul, Martin, Diakostavrianos, Tony, and others not mentioned by media but lots of proof in police files, etc) are freely roaming today, still doing God knows what…

Warning: the following post may be triggering/upsetting

The sinister Marc Dutroux cover-up (part one)

It’s worth reminding ourselves of the events surrounding Belgian paedophile abductor Marc Dutroux. Institutions that are meant to protect society can sometimes contribute to misdeeds of the most sinister kind. The Dutroux case was characterised by deliberate police incompetence and behind-the-scenes murder of witnesses.

In June 1995, two eight-year-old friends, Julie Lejeune and Melissa Russo, walked to a bridge to wave at the traffic, a regular pastime of theirs. They never came home. In stark contrast to the Madeleine McCann saga this year, the case attracted little attention, including from the police.

The families were soon disillusioned by the non-committed and lacklustre police investigation and hired a private investigator to look into things. The person came up with a profile that was passed on to the police investigators. It reported that the person responsible would probably be unemployed and very methodical.

There were only five suspects in Belgium who matched the drawn-up profile of the abductor at that time. One of them was Marc Dutroux, who had been convicted in 1989 for the abduction and rape of five young girls. He had been released in 1992 after serving only three years of a 13-year sentence.

Following his release, Dutroux began constructing a dungeon under his house in preparation for his coming spree of abduction. He was determined to escape detection this time and fine-tuned the underground cells to frightening perfection. The cages even had air vents in them. His ex-wife, Michelle Martin, slapped a happy coat of paint on the walls.

Meanwhile, the man who had returned Dutroux to society, Justice Minister Melchior Wathelet, was “rewarded with a prestigious appointment to serve as a judge at the European Court of Justice at The Hague”.

At the time of the first disappearance, evidence pointing to Dutroux had already come in. Two years earlier, investigators had heard from a man who was renting one of Dutroux’s properties. He had driven around with Dutroux who, upon noticing a girl walking down a street, had said: “There’s a fresh one.” Dutroux talked of the money to be made selling girls into slavery and offered the man money if he assisted him in the project.

The man was disturbed enough by this to file a complaint to the police within the very next hour. It was handled by one of three different police agencies in Belgium, similar to what we have in South Africa with the Scorpions. This particular agency was to receive plenty of useful tip-offs in the months ahead — enough, in fact, to bring the investigation to an immediate close.

But the agency failed to act on the information. Neither did it pass anything on to the “rival” police force, clutching its secrets close to its chest.

In 1995, the agency not only had knowledge of Dutroux’s disturbing comments to a tenant about abducting girls, but actually also knew that he was busy with his dungeon. The previous informer had come forward with this information at the beginning of the year.

So, in June 1995, we have girls starting to disappear and compelling pointers in the direction of a convicted paedophile who has built a dungeon under his house.

The response? Dutroux isn’t even brought in for questioning. Maybe they thought he wanted to store some spare tools in the air-ventilated cellar.

Out of sight, other events were under way to suppress information. This information was not reported on at the time, but only surfaced in newspapers five years later.

In 2002, the BBC wrote: “Bruno Tagliaferro, a Charleroi scrap-metal merchant who knew Dutroux, claimed to know something about the car in which Julie and Melissa were kidnapped. But he was soon found dead, apparently of a heart attack.”

A rather suspicious heart attack, under the circumstances.

His wife also thought so and “refused to accept the verdict and arranged for his body to be exhumed. Samples sent to the US for analysis showed he’d been poisoned.”

But this tragic fate of the scrap-metal merchant who knew something about Dutroux was soon to extend to his wife.

The BBC added: “Soon after, her teenage son found her dead at home in her bed, her mattress smouldering. Publicly it was declared suicide, or an accident.”

It’s difficult to imagine how someone can accidentally set themselves alight in their bed, and surely the technique is rather outlandish for a suicide.

The BBC reported in 2002 that there had (at that stage) already been 20 such peculiar deaths surrounding the case: chiefly witnesses and informants due to give evidence in court in the build-up to the trial in 2004.

The removal of witnesses shows a resourceful and powerful strategy at work by a group operating almost on Mafia-type levels.

But let’s return to that awful 1995, when in August two more girls, 17-year-old An Marchal and 19-year-old Eefie Lambreckk, went missing during a vacation to seaside town Ostende. The police there treated the worried parents with scorn after they registered their disappearance and mockingly said the girls were probably out somewhere on an “adventure”.

They neglected to mention that two of their officers were part of that adventure. In 2004, Dutroux claimed in court that two police officers had assisted him with this kidnapping.

Small wonder then that the official investigation was going nowhere. The investigators failed even to see any connection with the June disappearance. Once again the aggrieved parents resorted to posters and banners, dissatisfied with the manner of the official channels of investigation.

A few weeks after the disappearance of the girls, the police agency that was already sitting on crucial information received something more. It was strong enough to lead to the immediate arrest of Dutroux and recovery of the four missing children.

In their post, a letter from Marc Dutroux’s mother. She wrote that she was concerned about her son, because he was keeping two girls, aged 17 and 19, in a dungeon under his house.

Oh, that’s pretty helpful stuff, isn’t it? So guess what they do?

Nothing, nothing at all.

It’s a disturbing picture of police irregularity that gets all the murkier as this case progresses. How is it possible to explain behaviour such as this? This cannot be fed under the mere bracket of “gross incompetence”.

It certainly set the tone for the most damning and tragic moment of “incompetence” in all of the investigation, which we will look at in part two

The sinister Marc Dutroux cover-up (part 2)
This is the second part in our investigation of the sinister police mishaps surrounding the case of Marc Dutroux.  In December 1995, Dutroux was arrested for stealing a car. While in custody, plans were made for the search of his house. Hearing about this proposed search, the “rival” police agency gate crashed the investigation and took over the plans for the search.

Remember, this was the agency that already knew about Dutroux’s dungeon and that he was keeping two girls down there. Dutroux’s mother had filled the agency in.

So here it was finally taking action, getting involved directly after months of inexplicable hibernation. “Getting involved” and “intervening” are concepts not too far apart in the case of this investigative agency.

It had also been watching Dutroux’s house for months in a project called “Operation Othello”. Now the chief investigative officer demanded to conduct the search himself, saying in motivation that he had been watching Dutroux and “knew” him. Permission was duly granted and the chief inspected the house accompanied only by a locksmith.

If it weren’t for this locksmith, who was to give testimony much later, we would never have known what happened during this strange and fateful visit.

The men found the secret entrance to the basement and went down there. Down below, an unusual discovery: chains and *l cream. Suddenly came the clearly audible cries of two young girls. It was impossible to miss.

The police officer’s immediate and strange reaction was to hiss: “Silence,” after which the cries died down. The locksmith alerted the chief to the fact that they had just heard crying. The chief said: “Who’s doing the investigation here?”

Some videos were also found. The men departed the scene, leaving behind two girls — the ones that had been kidnapped in August 2005. The girls had been held captive in a cell that wouldn’t allow further width than open elbows and went only as high as one’s navel — for four months. One person was to comment afterwards that one wouldn’t even keep a dog in a cage such as this.

With Dutroux temporarily in custody, the girls stopped being fed. Dutroux’s ex-wife, Michelle Martin, merely dumped the food near the door, saying later she was afraid the children would attack her. The two were unable to reach the food and slowly starved to death.

Their parents were to be in those very cages months later. They noticed that one of the girls had managed to scribble a last word on the wall with her nails in the slow moments before death. One of the journalists covering the case said that one of the most moving moments he experienced was when he saw the parents hutched down together holding hands in that horrific cell, in tears.

The police officer viewed the videos from Dutroux’s dungeon. At the very least, that’s what he did.

Seeing as he had disregarded the cries of the girls and didn’t find the presence of chains and *l cream odd in the basement of a convicted paedophile, it was small wonder how he responded to what he came across in the videos. On the tapes: a recording of one of the parents’ plea on TV to find their missing daughter. Another video showed Dutroux building his dungeon.

Add to this the testimony of Dutroux’s mother, and you surely had enough to pin Dutroux.

But once again, we find “incompetence” descending to twisted depths. The videos were discarded by the officer as “unimportant”. Operation Othello, the stake-out of Dutroux’s house, got called off.

Dutroux was cleared of any suspicion. After a four-month sentence for the stolen vehicle at the beginning of 1996, he was back out. Now he was no longer being watched, free to continue where he had left off.

Soon there would be new girls in the dungeon.

We will conclude with this report in part three.

The sinister Marc Dutroux cover-up (part 3)

This is the final part of our Marc Dutroux investigation.

Paedophile Dutroux’s support system in law enforcement and legal circles came into their own as the case wound up. I think it’s important to place these facts out in the open once more for public evaluation because much information is buried in “conspiracy” sites.

In April 1996, Dutroux ended his four-month sentence for car theft and promptly carried on where he had left off. As we saw in part two, Operation Othello, the watching of his house, had been called off by police officer Rene Michaux.

This man had been down to the dungeon himself and heard the screams of the two then-alive girls. He had ignored and even hushed up the screams, according to the locksmith who accompanied him. Years later in court, Michaux claimed that he thought the cries were coming from outside, in the street!

The face of this sinister police officer bears that strange flicker of evil that paedophiles are prone to exhibit. He played a central role in keeping attention away from Dutroux when the latter started abducting girls. By calling off the watching of his house, he kept up his good work by clearing the way for Dutroux to continue.

Dutroux didn’t waste any time. Within a month of his release, he abducted 12-year-old Sabine Dardenne. Her disappearance was to remain a mystery to the police. Small wonder, as an outgoing magistrate hadn’t even bothered to inform her replacement of the ongoing missing girls’ cases.

In August 1996, 14-year-old Laetitia Delhez was abducted. Dutroux claimed later in court that it was for “company” for his other captive.

This time the community swung into action and the local police force became passionately involved in the search, a definite departure from the behaviour we’ve seen of their compatriots in other regions. The result was that information about a suspicious van came forward. A match was obtained to Dutroux through a partially remembered licence plate. He had finally been caught.

Dutroux led them to his dungeon early on a Monday morning. The 14-year-old who had been abducted six days earlier was found. The discovery of the other girl who had been there for two months was surprising to some.

As the girls were freed from the cage, they ran to hug and kiss Dutroux, who apparently enjoyed the moment. They had been brainwashed into thinking that Dutroux was protecting them from “bad people”. These were now the bad people that had arrived to come get them.

It is important to highlight the role of the investigative Judge, Jean-Marc Connerotte. He was apparently instrumental in securing the arrest of Dutroux and greatly admired by the public when it became clear he was practically a lone ranger surrounded by criminal incompetence.

In August, Connerotte appealed for other victims of paedophile rings to come forward with testimony.

Thirty-three-year-old Regina Louf responded. She described various orgies she had attended in her youth in detail and named a prominent Belgian businessman, Jean-Michel Nihoul, as the chief organiser. She had also seen a young Dutroux there. She described a house in detail and a murder she had seen at a “sex slave” party in 1984.

Dutroux alleged from the beginning that he was not acting alone, saying that Nihoul was the actual “brains” of the operation. The authorities were determined not to believe him.

Here’s how an Observer reporter, who did an excellent piece in 2002, described her meeting with Nihoul prior to his arrest: “During the course of our meal he, apparently playfully, grabbed me, tickling, and finally pulled me over on to him in the restaurant booth until I had to appeal to my colleagues for rescue.”

He had greeted her by saying he was the “monster of Belgium”.

A playful monster, in other words.

“He has all but dared the state to prosecute him,” said the BBC, “claiming that he is beyond the reach of the law because he has information that, if made public, ‘would bring the government and the entire state down’.”

In custody Nihoul confessed to “organising an orgy at a Belgium chateau, which several government officials, police officers and a former European commissioner attended”.

As victims started coming forward and confessing to sexual abuse in their youth and the same names kept popping up, the notion that Dutroux was acting alone was becoming less and less credible. The media were obviously in full swing by now, with the “House of horror” headlines we can all remember.

By mid-October, the citizens of Belgium were stirred to public outrage as details of the police mismanagement started appearing. “The Justice Ministry was sitting on a politically sensitive list of customers of paedophile videotapes,” said a report in the Los Angeles Times at the time. This list drifted into obscurity.

What tipped public outcry into mass protest was when “the investigative Judge in the Dutroux case, Jean-Marc Connerotte, was dismissed. Many Belgians viewed Connerotte as a hero because he secured the arrest of Marc Dutroux and collected significant evidence against him that would help convict Dutroux and those in his paedophile ring.

“Belgium’s Supreme Court removed Connerotte because he attended a fund-raising dinner, which was organised to help in the search for missing children. It was later decided that his attendance at the fund-raising event caused him to lose his objectivity when investigating the Dutroux case.”

The suspicious dismissal of Connerotte led to a remarkable march. Called the White March, it was the biggest public demonstration in Belgium since the Nüremberg trials. The public were given strong reassurances by the government of a shake-up of the police system and justice triumphing.

But this was not forthcoming. In fact, the opposite tendency was already gaining momentum, silently, away from public statements.

The removal of Connerotte complete, the network set to work at discrediting the testimony of Regina Louf. As mentioned, Louf had supplied details of a murder she had witnessed at a party attended by Dutroux and Nihoul.

Said the Observer: “Christine van Hees’s body had been found in 1984 dumped in the grounds of a disused mushroom farm on the outskirts of Brussels. The farm was later demolished, but in 1996 Louf described to the police team its intricate details, the wallpaper, the sinks, hooks on the ceiling, a network of stairs and adjoining rooms unique to that building.”

A man who grew up at the farm, the son of the former owner, showed the Observer reporter photographs of the house and the mushroom factory. “He said: ‘I have never met Regina Louf. All I know is that she could not have described the house as well as she did unless she’d been there. It was two houses joined together in a strange way. It would be impossible to invent it.’”

For 12 years the unsolved murder of Van Hees gathered dust in the Brussels files under the direction of Judge Van Espen. Two years ago, a Belgian journalist revealed the close relationship between Van Espen and Nihoul and his then wife.

As a lawyer, Van Espen had represented Nihoul’s wife. Van Espen’s sister was the godmother of Nihoul’s child. Yet, when Louf accused these two of the murder, Van Espen saw no conflict of interest and no reason to resign. Nor was he sacked, as Connerotte had been. Instead he was allowed to order the police officers to stay out of the case. Van Espen only resigned as the judge in charge of the mushroom-factory investigation in early 1998 after his relationship with Nihoul was exposed.

A strange co-incidence, isn’t it? No wonder it was so important to discredit Regina Louf, as she had evidence that not only connected Dutroux to Nihoul, but also Nihoul to very prominent judicial officials.

In its response, the network didn’t disappoint, coming out guns blazing.

Observer: “In the spring of 1997, Louf’s interrogators had been sent home without explanation and a new team was assigned to ‘reread’ her testimony. The press was briefed that the previous team had been removed because they had manipulated the evidence of Louf, who was then known by the code name X1. It is a charge which the police team has always vigorously denied and which has never been substantiated.”

But they weren’t finished yet.

“And then the media campaign began. Louf’s name was leaked to the press. The government-owned TV station RTBF began a campaign designed to prove that Dutroux was an ‘isolated pervert’ kidnapping girls for himself, that there was no network, that Nihoul was innocent and Louf was a liar.

“Belgium’s flagship current-affairs television programme, Au Nom de La Loi , floated Louf’s face over a backdrop of crows pecking over debris orchestrated by a Blair Witch-style soundtrack. Her ageing parents appeared as tragic victims of a deranged fantasist, whose false memories had blighted their last years.”

“What the programme makers knew but didn’t say was that the parents had already admitted to police that a family friend in his 40s, Tony van den Bogaert, had had a key to their home and unlimited access to their 12-year-old daughter. Nor did they tell their viewers that Van den Bogaert had himself admitted his relationship with Louf to police.

“Van den Bogaert lives freely on the borders of Belgium and Holland unmolested by the law or the press. Au Nom de La Loi has never attempted to track him down and expose this self-confessed paedophile. Instead it has devoted hours of airtime to destroying the name of his victim, Louf, whose only offence appears to be that she was prepared to testify about the organised abuse she’d suffered as a child.

“This campaign has succeeded. Judges have announced that Louf will not be called as a witness in any future trial of Dutroux or his associates. Her testimony and that of all the 10 witnesses who came forward to Judge Connerotte has been declared worthless.”

“Even the Prosecutor General of the Dutroux case, Anne Thily, seems to have been in on the shady action, saying that Louf was a ‘fantasist’ and had ‘invented everything’.

“Connerotte’s replacement, Judge Langlois, also parked his car in the same garage, because he blatantly refused permission for the hairs gathered in Dutroux’s dungeon to be sent for DNA analysis ‘despite pressure from his prosecutor, Michel Bourlet, who believed that a DNA identification of those hairs might reveal who else was involved’.”

His boss Thily backed him all the way.

“There was no need to get the hairs analysed as no one else entered the cage,” she said. “There was no network so there was no need to look for evidence of one.”

What ingenious rubbish. Bad scriptwriters wouldn’t even be able to come up with something like this.

“In any case,” she continued, “the hairs have all now been analysed — all 5 000.”

And the results of this analysis? asked the Observer reporter.

“Nothing.”

Thily flashed a “triumphant” smile at the reporter.

She concluded: “No evidence of any relevance in the Dutroux affair. Which proves, of course, that Langlois was right all along.”

The Observer reporter had done her homework.

“Sources central to the investigation confirm that to date the hairs have still not been analysed.”

The reporter caught Thily out again when she said that “the bodies were too decomposed to test for DNA”.

“The autopsy states clearly that the bodies were not decomposed,” said the reporter. “Samples were taken. But no one seems to know what has happened to the results.”

So yes, the picture by now had gotten much murkier, with a return to the former “incompetence” that had so tragically been manifested before. The Dutroux case had been hijacked yet again, this time by the chief prosecutor.

Behind the scenes, the murder of potential witnesses was occurring by now. Publicly the cause of death was all declared “suicide”. Things take a rather macabre turn when you hear that even Nihoul’s dentist committed “suicide”.

But back to the official side of the case. Here, under the dodgy auspices of Judge Langlois of “no DNA” fame, the investigation took on another pace altogether. The citizens of Belgium were basically being dealt a collective slap in the face as the trial stalled and crawled along — for another eight years.

Here’s the excuse for the delay.

The Observer: “The official explanation for the delay is that hysterical conspiracy theories forced investigators to search for paedophile networks which didn’t exist.”

Oh, there we go again. Dutroux acted alone.

“But far from being investigated, leads pointing to a network seem rather to have been ignored or buried.”

Even though Dutroux “acted alone”, he still apparently had some friends willing to lend a hand, because in 1997 the prison “allowed Dutroux to leave the building to consult files that would be used in his upcoming trial”. Dutroux used the opportunity and “overpowered a police officer that was guarding him, and escaped for three hours”.

As late as March 18 2004, “a handcuff key was found in Dutroux’s cell, apparently smuggled in a salt bag. Prison authorities were accused to trying to arrange Dutroux’s escape.”

The year 2004 finally saw the sentencing of Dutroux. He obviously — or under the circumstances, perhaps one should say surprisingly — got a life sentence.

His ex-wife Michelle Martin, the woman who stopped feeding the youngsters in the dungeon because she was “afraid of them”, got 30 years. Accomplice businessman Michel Lelievre got 25 years.

The monster of Belgium, Nihoul, got a mere five years. He must have been thrilled. That means, by the end of the year, he’ll be back among us.

The aftermath of this whole affair leaves one with a troubling picture of how dark deeds can flourish in very influential circles. It’s surely little comfort to the bereaved families to know that the full picture of this monstrous episode may never fully emerge.

If indeed Dutroux was part of a much bigger network, as seems likely when one looks at the evidence, then most of its members escaped detection. It seems bizarre to think that such a network can exist and include politicians and other highly placed members of society. It takes quite some machinery to deflect the outraged attention of an entire country. But they managed it.

By 2002, the citizens who had taken part in the march were no longer being hailed but called a “mob” in certain newspapers. The rehabilitation had been exhaustively applied.

Dutroux acted alone! That’s the official version that wants to house itself in our collective memory.

The journalists who pierced the fabric of this complicated cover-up and exposed the dishonesty reeling in its wake have done their community a great service. We can be lucky that we live in a time when it is more difficult to conceal facts than a few decades ago. And yet so much remains unanswered, buried in the pile of yesterday’s papers. The general public don’t hold their interest for long, as we’re seeing with the Madeleine McCann saga.

It’s bitter to discover that Rene Michaux, the police officer who took that fateful trip down the stairs to the dungeon and heard the screams, was never even charged. He’s almost 60 now and is probably hoping to take his secrets to his grave.

The others who were involved appear, for the time being, to have gotten away with it. Many of them may even be flourishing in state and judicial circles all over Europe, which might explain why the McCann investigation has been such a tragic mess.

http://www.whale.to/c/marc_dutroux1.html

« Last Edit: November 24, 2012, 04:30:11 AM by Arduenna silva »
“The Brotherhood cannot be wiped out because it is not an organisation in the ordinary sense. Nothing holds it together except an idea which is indestructible.” -1984

I am not “Emmanuel Goldstein” of the magazine 2600. My username is derived from 1984.


Offline EmmanuelGoldstein⌛

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Reputation 32
Sobering words from a Belgian former congressman and senator:

“Imagine, everywhere you hear that story about a blackmail dossier in which organizations of the extreme right are in the possession of pictures and videos on which a number of prominent people in and around Brussels have sex with young girls; minors it is said. The existence of this dossier has always been vehemently denied. Until it was proven that testimonies and videos of this affair indeed were in the possession of the police services. An officer of the judicial police (Marnette, H.G.) denied the existence of these videos, while afterwards this person’s superior admitted that they did exist, that they were kept with the judicial police in Brussels, but that they were completely worthless. Strange, because this stuff needs to be deposited with the registrar and not be kept in the possession of some police service. Subsequently, examining magistrate Jean-Marie Schlicker confirms that this dossier does indeed exist, but that he wishes not to give any testimonies about it. The at first non-existing dossier turns out to exist. The videos without substance then turn out to be interesting enough after all to be handed over to the examining magistrate tasked with the investigation into the Gang of Nijvel. But this person subsequently is afraid to testify about that! What do you think that has been going on here?”

-September 1989, Congressman Hugo Coveliers, secretary of the special investigating committee tasked with evaluating the way gangsterism and terrorism is combated in Belgium (1988-1990), to Humo magazine (1990, Hugo Gijsels, ‘De Bende & Co’, p. 133-134). Coveliers became a senator in 1995.

Discouraging yet revealing words allegedly from Former CIA director William Colby:

“What you have to understand, John, is that sometimes there are forces and events too big, too powerful, with so much at stake for other people or institutions, that you cannot do anything about them, no matter how evil or wrong they are and no matter how dedicated or sincere you are or how much evidence you have. This is simply one of the hard facts of life you have to face.”

- Former CIA director and Cercle member William Colby giving advice to his friend senator John DeCamp, urging to quit his investigations into the Franklin child abuse affair and to write a book about his experiences (The Franklin Coverup, 2nd edition, foreword).

We the People of the Earth need to keep standing up to this madness! After all, “we are the 99%”.

“The Brotherhood cannot be wiped out because it is not an organisation in the ordinary sense. Nothing holds it together except an idea which is indestructible.” -1984

I am not “Emmanuel Goldstein” of the magazine 2600. My username is derived from 1984.


TrxiZ

  • Guest
A firstly as secret set conversation between jean-Denis Lejeune (a victims father) and Michelle Marzin has now been leaked via the conversation to the news agency SudPress, the “accident”  happend via the secret conversation wich was about three hours long.

A SmartPhone Failure, some claimed, was the issue of the leaked conversation.

SudPress is going to leak parts of the conversation.

The Article you will find at next in german please click on translate until a english version is avail.

« Last Edit: November 26, 2012, 00:48:59 AM by T™ »

TrxiZ

  • Guest
Dass das Durchsickern des Gesprächs zwischen Michelle Martin, der Ex-Frau und Komplizin des Mörders Dutroux und Jean-Denis Lejeune, dem Vater des Opfers Julie, in den Medien die Folge eines technischen Problems mit dem Handy von einem der beiden Mediatoren gewesen sein soll, will Sudpresse nicht bestätigen.

Es war eine Journalistin von Sudpresse, die am Freitagabend einen Teil des Gesprächs via Handy mitgehört hat.

Laut des Vereins ohne Erwerbszweck Médiante habe ein Mediator, der bei dem Gespräch anwesend war, sein Handy fallen lassen. Das Handy habe daraufhin automatisch die zuletzt eingehende Nummer angewählt. Das sei die Nummer einer Journalistin von Sudpresse gewesen, die daraufhin das Gespräch zwischen Martin und Lejeune habe abhören können.

Auf ihrer Website sagt Sudpresse am Sonntag, gleichwohl “nicht über die Elemente zu verfügen, die zulassen, diese Version zu bestätigen.” Die Zeitungsgruppe betont jedoch, dass sie die Information, die sie sich über das Gespräch beschaffte, “über eine Quelle, die beim Treffen anwesen war” bekam und die ihr “erlaubte, Teile des Gesprächs der beiden Parteien und der Mediatoren zu benutzen”.

Sudpresse bleibt hinter ihrer Entscheidung stehen, Zitate aus dem Gespräch zu veröffentlichen. “Wir haben nur unsere journalistische Arbeit gemacht und unsere wichtigste Aufgabe wahrgenommen: Den Leser zu informieren.”

http://www.deredactie.be/cm/vrtnieuws.deutsch/nachrichten/1.1484517


Offline Arduina

  • cognitive dissidence
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
  • Reputation 84
  • Transparency 4 the state-Privacy 4 the rest of us!
Thank you so much, T!
Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government,owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.To destroy this invisible government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship.FDR

TrxiZ

  • Guest

TrxiZ

  • Guest
unbeliveable for most of parents – this is an punch into the face of the parents. that just shows:

“see what I can do, I can do what i want”

Michelle Martin went shopping in Knokke

It has emerged that Michelle Martin went shopping in the seaside resort of Knokke-Heist last week.

Martin is the former wife of the convicted child sex killer Marc Dutroux. She was also convicted on manslaughter charges.

She went to gaol following a conviction on manslaughter charges after she was held responsible for deprivation leading to death when she failed to provide food and drink for two of Dutroux’ victims locked up in the cellar of her home. She was released early this year.

In Knokke Martin was not only sighted on the promenade, she apparently also went to a top class hairdresser’s.

The Mayor of Knokke, Count Leopold Lippens, said he was puzzled that he had not been notified of Martin’s visit. Since her controversial early release from prison Martin has been staying with nuns at their convent in Malonne in Wallonia.

Mayor Lippens told VRT News: “I thought she would be staying in the nunnery. I’m not very happy about this. What if she met relatives of the victims on the seafront?”

Mr Lippens also reportedly said: “It’s a scandal that somebody like that can parade on the seafront unhindered. Let her wander about in the garden of the convent of Malonne. She has no business here.”

By visiting Knokke Michelle Martin hasn’t violated the conditions of her early release. She is not allowed to visit the provinces of Limburg or Luxembourg where her victims come from or seek contact with the family of her victims, but West Flanders shouldn’t be a problem.

Mr Lippens’s words didn’t go down too well with Flemish editorialists. On Thursday Het Nieuwsblad wrote that his reaction was totally unjustified, while Het Laatste Nieuws says that his intervention is an attack on a state with a rule of law.

Het Nieuwsblad’s Liesbeth Van Impe says that we either accept the rule of law or undermine the rule of law by insisting that Martin is never released.

Michelle Martin’s lawyer is considering a complaint against Mayor Lippens as his client is free to go wherever she wants.

The father of one of the victims, Jean Lambrecks, sticks up for Mr Lippens saying that he believes that the visit to the coast was a sordid affair. Eefje’s father also attacks the fact that Martin had herself declared without means, but that she has the money to go to Knokke: “In sixteen years in gaol she saved 40,000 euros. She’s got enough money for a VIP treatment in Knokke.”

[Flandersnews.be / Expatica]

http://www.expatica.com/be/news/belgian-news/Michelle-Martin-went-shopping-in-Knokke-_253776.html


TrxiZ

  • Guest
There is something important about this:
Leopold Lippens also mentioned in the dutroux dossier
on pages 417 und 1068..

http://wlstorage.net/file/dutroux-dossier-summary-2005.pdf


Offline Arduina

  • cognitive dissidence
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
  • Reputation 84
  • Transparency 4 the state-Privacy 4 the rest of us!
A coincidence is that the witness X1 is from Knokke and stated that her abuse and exploitation started in Knokke…she and another witness claimed having been raped by Lippens, Jean-Michel Nihoul and others, some of them friends/acquaintances of Lippens.

Also, Carine Dellaert (mentioned in the document) was found dead (murdered if I recall correctly) in the early 90’s; X1 and others stated in the document that Carine was a victim in this ring as well.

Here are the parts on this Dutroux document leak by WL that mention the Lippens (Leopold Lippens, his brother and someone else related), that have been translated so far. These are statements and findings written down by investigators. It’s not known how much truth there is to these witnesses’ testimonies, but there could be truth to it.
The sentences in red italics are the investigators’ notes in the leaked document, not mine, just to clarify. I tried to post the following as closest to how it appears in the document.

Warning: parts of this may be triggering/disturbing:
________________________________________________________

On page 234:

ANONYMOUS LETTER
The LIPPENS have destroyed millions of pedophile images
LEOPOLD was involved in a case of scatology and obtained a suspension of the delivery of the judgement
His brother paid the plaintiffs
A seizure of cocaine was made at Golf of LIPPENS= suspension of the pronouncement at
BRUGES
Without the LIPPENS dozens of children would have been spared
———————-

On pages 393-394:

114.037 |    34 |           |B.A.G.     HEARING of X1
29/09     |                    |        Same conditions as the hearing on 20/09
HUPEZ                         |        She hands over a picture of TONY
|                             |        She recognizes X2 (ops MOULIN) on photo
|        Vict. |            |        X2 was a victim of acts of pedophilia in front of her
|      Location|          |        She recognizes on the picture the house of Dupré street
|           Zoo|           |        She confirms to having been initiated to relations with dogs at
|                            |                4 years old in KNOKKE by her grandmother
|                            |        3 dogs: a dachshund – a German shepherd – a longhaired shepherd
|                            |                a goat and a donkey
|                            |        Men watched her with the dogs
|                            |        Then: rape by the spectators
|                            |        Sessions with dogs every 2-3 months
|                            |        With the dogs: photos-media

     14/08/2005 = 1Mdl VERGNON
SYNTHESE AA’AA                                                                                            394

|        Vict   |           |        Other girl = NICOLE whose parents rented a room in the villa
|                            |        Her parents are/were aware
|        Vict   |           |        EEBO girl was abused by her father (16 years old)
|                            |        Customer around 2-4 years  = LIPPENS current mayor of KNOKKE -
|                            |                    especially with animals
|        Clients|         |        = owner of the hotel “HIRONDELLE”
|      Location|         |        Hôtel HIRONDELLE
|                            |        Some customers frequented the golf of KNOKKE
|                            |        The customers of the Hirondelle were friends of LIPPENS
|                            |        Description of HIRONDELLE
|                            |        Grandmother died in March ’96
|        Vict  |            |        Other children: LUC (8 years old in 1976) from KNOKKE
|                            |                VERONIQUE (blonde – 30 years old)
|                            |                ISABELLE (brunette – 29 years old) from KNOKKE
|                            |                Chantal STORME
|                            |        Almost all the children in the same school
|                            |        LUC and CHANTAL = Visitatie School
|                            |        CHANTAL’s parents present at orgies
|                            |        Father of CHANTAL =  fondled her
|                            |        Orgies at the Hirondelle = routine = always the same
|                            |        Polaroid pictures
|                            |        Children forced to drink
|                            |        Sometimes violence against the children
|       Clients |         |        MARTENS – VANDEN BOEYNANTS – a Flemish person of the CVP
|                            |        She explains that some people did not know where they fell
|                            |        note: trap to compromise them
|                            |        ———————————————-
|                            |        She had sexual relations with VANDEN BOEYNANTS at the hotel
|                            |                Hirondelle and in a villa of KNOKKE (ZOUTE) near the woods
|                            |        She might perhaps recognize the chauffeur
|                            |        Two rapes by VANDEN BOEYNANTS
|                            |        Once alone and once in a group
|                            |        Anal rape
|                            |        VDB has proposed to the three men present to try X1
|                            |        Two  fellatios + brutal relation with the other two
|                            |        Description of the three men
|                            |        They frequented the golf course and the cultural center of KNOKKE
|                            |        One was  familiar with LIPPENS
|                            |        —————————————

From page 406:
116.019|     62            |BAG     Investigation findings of “CLO”‘s death
28/10/96|   |               |        CLO was holder  between June and December 83
HUPEZ  |                     |        VANDEBOGAERT comes unexpectedly seeking X1 and
|                            |        takes her blindfolded in a house where she is
|                            |        locked in a room of the R-D-C with CLO who is
|                            |        about to give birth.
|                            |        X1 helps CLO give birth and a boy is born alive. X1 cuts the umbilical
|                                |        cord and puts the child on CLO’s belly.
|                            |        They came for the child while X1 takes care of CLO.   CLO dies
|                            |        and Vandenbogaert obliges  X1 to leave.
|                            |        LIPPENS,  VANDERELST and two unknown persons go with X1 in a Chinese |                                |        restaurant in BRUGES. They are joined by a Deputy Commissioner of
|                            |                KNOKKE and a French-speaker in his forties and named GUY.
|                            |        After the restaurant, they all go to KNOKKE to the
|                            |        grandmother of X1 (Cécile) where they are expected by the grandmother.
|                            |        X1 is raped by LIPPENS then by VANDERELST.
|                            |        X1 fights against 5 (2 others in addition to LIPPENS,  VANDERELST
|                            |                and the Commissioner hold her down and  rape her .
|                            |        CLO is identified as being:
|                            |        Carine DELLAERT (01/04/66)

From page 417:

“Number 116.353
07/11/96
PIRARD

INVESTIGATION FINDINGS REPORT- ANONYMOUS LETTERS
The receiving of two anonymous letters transmitted by JI LANGLOIS
These are two anonymous letters denouncing MAURICE and LEOPOLD LIPPENS for
sessions with children
6 to 8 children from 12 to 14 years old per sessions
They choose among the children offered
Each session takes place in a different location in the NETHERLANDS
There are *l penetration, sodomy, fellatio also from the children between them
They also go to SPAIN, to SEVILLE departing from HOLLAND or
LUXEMBOURG under false names
After the arrest of DUTROUX all material has been removed from KNOKKE (Tapes-
photos)
The LIPPENS are very influential and very wealthy
In case of psychiatric examination: they crack
The LIPPENS received a copy of the first letter 48 hours after it was sent
Currently they aren’t doing anything anymore, no security
They are being blackmailed by two providers and they pay
They are also sadomasochistic
Documents will be photocopied and passed to six different magistrates
These letters describe facts similar to those reported by X1
Letters written in French
Dated 05 or 15/09/96 mailed to DROGENBOS and ??/10/96
The author says: “THE VICTIMS TELL” and always uses the form “WE”
Junction of attached apostilles and of the letters and envelopes
Letters: many typos and spelling mistakes

From page 1068:

RETRANSCRIPTION OF X2’s HEARING of 4/24/97  + SEIZURE of two CASSETTES
– X2 provides a confirmation on the data from LEVY, particularly regarding the
Winston Churchill house.
– X2 hesitates in regards to the commercial activity of Bara street but is formal regarding the
bank.
– X2 confirms that she was always brought by car to CHIMAY, to the HUNTING at DINANT, to
KNOKKE, EINDHOVEN.
– X2 specifies that she also had to lie down on the backseat during travels to
KNOKKE to the CROMWELL hotel. X2 specifies that these trips are made once arrived at
KNOKKE and not from BRUSSELS. She specifies that there is no sign [sign-in sheet? Logo sign?] at this hotel.
– X2 makes a description of the interior of the hotel “CROMWELL” (?).
X2 sees EVA (12 or 13 years old), but she does not participate in anything. She went 3 times to the
CROMWELL from 1985 to 1986. It seems that there were two other girls of the same age, these girls
were definitely not developed (no apparent *). None of them had
makeup nor were adorned. According to X2, the girls that are dressed and have makeup on are intended for EINDHOVEN.
– X2 talks about the presence of a certain KAREL.
– X2 sees a certain LEOPOLD with another man.
– X2 confirms that it is LEOPOLD LIPPENS.
– X2 confirms that the person named LEVY raped her at a hunting party in CHIMAY. And
– X2 confirms that the person named LEVY raped her at a hunting party in CHIMAY. And
that a blond horse-rider raped her as well as EVA during a hunting party in DINANT.
– X2 speaks of what EVA had entrusted her with in 1987 about a certain LILIANE of
BRUSSELS to whom one should restore the land.
note: see the declaration of WAETERSCHOOT regarding bodies that have been
buried in the park of a castle. LILIANNE could be Lilianne de RETHY and the castle mentioned
by WAET. Could it be be hers????

– X2 specifies that she was brought to  ALEXANDRE to play cards.
note: WAETERSCHOOT cites that her aggressor is Alexandre de Mérode. There may be a link
with the Alexander mentioned here???

– X2 recounts that everything had ended in 1990.
– X2 speaks of a certain CASTIAUX

« Last Edit: December 21, 2012, 22:48:36 PM by Arduenna silva »
Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government,owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.To destroy this invisible government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship.FDR


xx
How the cops busted a pedophile ring

Started by mayya

0 Replies
441 Views
Last post November 15, 2013, 22:53:18 PM
by mayya
xx
“Marc Dutroux a de l’or dans les mains”

Started by Arduina

0 Replies
865 Views
Last post February 03, 2013, 05:14:21 AM
by Arduina
xx
US man set to plead guilty over global pedophile ring

Started by mayya

0 Replies
1066 Views
Last post July 23, 2013, 09:19:55 AM
by mayya
xx
Marc Dutroux: Monster of Belgium (Documentary)

Started by TrxiZ

1 Replies
1245 Views
Last post October 25, 2012, 20:19:11 PM
by TrxiZ

.
Regards,

Greg_L-W.
.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337 -
number witheld calls are blocked & calls are recorded.

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS, >SEARCH< & >Side Bars< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’ archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General ‘Stuff’ ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com

Skype: GregL-W

TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU
  
 

Posted in Child Abduction, Child Abuse in The EU, Marc DuTroux, Paedophilia, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

David Miliband Admits He Voted Based On Tony Blair’s Lies

Posted by Greg Lance-Watkins on 10/08/2014

.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins – Greg_L-W.

.

 

David Miliband Admits He Voted Based On Tony Blair’s Lies

 

Hi,

it is interesting to note that David Milliband in his efforts to disassociate himself from his own decision to vote for the obscene abuse of power and murderous invasion of Iraq by exposing the truth that Tony Blair and some in his clique deliberately lied about Sheik Hussein claiming dishonestly, with lies to Parliament, The Queen, the peoples of Britain and our allies that Iraq held weapons of mass destruction usable on an international basis.

 

We all now know that this was a deliberate lie by Tony Blair and a few of his odious Labour cronies synically supported by John Scarlet who Blair rewarded with a Knighthood for his dishonesty and the fabrication of false ‘intel’ and the ‘Dodgey Dossier’ exposed to Channel 4 News and Newsnight andf the world by myself, with the help of 3 associates.

 

We then note in the article below that Tony Blair is still telling lies in an effort to obfuscate the truth and avoid his rightful place facing the International Court in the Hague on a charge of War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity.

It is also worth noting the obscene action taken against Liyia by Britain and a few allies based on the contrived ‘Arab Spring’ and the destabilising of both Libya, Egypt and the Middle East by these actions including the apparent condoning of the obscene murders of both Sadam Hussein and Murmar Gadaffi and 1,000s of innocent civilians.

Little wonder that we were resoundingly defeated in Iraq, Libia and Afghanistan and sadly as the actions were based on lies and ineptitude one can only concede we were deservedly defeated.

How dare our political crooks use our military forces as mere bully boys and mercenaries for their own political aspirations!

To say nothing of the Western World’s supply of arms and failure to act to prevent the War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity of the Zionist oppressors and butchers of the IDF Terrorist Forces and their abuse of power and slaughter of the indiginous Palestinian peoples they hold captive behind walls and barbed wire and shoot, bomb and mortar with sophisticated weapons with the acquescence of Western Politicians and the profiteering of Western Arms Barons!

Iraq War Created Isis, Concedes David Miliband

The 2003 invasion of Iraq by the US and its ally the UK helped to destabilize the country, leading to the rise of militant group Isis, admitted former UK foreign secretary David Miliband.

As the US launched air strikes on the militant group that has seized controls of swathes of Iraq, Milliband said that the situation in the country nine years after the war “induces a high degree of humility”.

“It’s clearly the case that the invasion of Iraq, or more importantly what happened afterwards, is a significant factor in understanding the current situation in the country,” Miliband told the Observer.

Asked whether the conflict ravaging the country had led him to regret voting in favour of war in Iraq, Miliband, who is now chief executive of charity the International Rescue Committee, replied: “I regret it because I made a decision on the basis of upholding the norms of respect to weapons of mass destruction, and there were none.”

He said that he accepted that the consequences of the Iraq war had left the majority of the public in the US and the UK unwilling to support interventions in the Middle East, even to prevent humanitarian catastrophes, such as Syria.

“You have to, you have to take responsibility,” said Miliband. He added: “You can’t press the rewind button.”

When asked if deposed dictator Saddam Hussein would have been able to hold the country together, he replied “perhaps”.

The remarks contrast with those of former prime minister Tony Blair, who in an essay on his website in June, described as “bizarre” the view that the chaos resulting from the Iraq war had led to the rise of Sunni jihadist Islamic State, formerly known as Isis.

“We have to liberate ourselves from the notion that ‘we’ have caused this,” Blair said. “We haven’t.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE

.
Regards,

Greg_L-W.
.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337 -
number witheld calls are blocked & calls are recorded.

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS, >SEARCH< & >Side Bars< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’ archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General ‘Stuff’ ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com

Skype: GregL-W

TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU
  
 

Posted in Afghanistan, Blair, BLAIR; BROWN; STRAW; MANDELSON; CAMPBELL; WAR CRIMES; CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY; BETRAYAL;, Crimes Against Humanity, David Miliband, Egypt, Iraq, ISIS, John SCARLET, Libya, Palestine, Tony Blair, Uncategorized, Zionist Attrocities, Zionist Crimes Against Humanity, Zionist Terrorism, Zionist War Crimes | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

>GUEST POST: Steve Morson on BBC Bias & TV Licence Tax

Posted by Greg Lance-Watkins on 08/06/2014

>GUEST POST: Steve Morson on BBC Bias & TV Licence Tax

.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins – Greg_L-W.

.

>GUEST POST:

Steve Morson writes in complaint to Sir Micheal Lyons Chairman of The BBC Trust in some detail concerning BBC Bias & TV Licence Tax

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
Hi,

minded that Steve Morson was a UKip prospective parliamentary candidate for Bromsgrove

MORSON, Steve 01

where the disgraced Julie Kirkbride was MP (well one of the homes she claimed expenses for!) this complaint written to Sir Michael Lyons in his capacity as Chairman of The BBC Trust, covers many of our feelings regarding the debased, befouled and biased BBC!

I strongly advise those of you with an interest in the future well being of these United kingdoms regardless of whether or not you support UKip or not to read this to the end! It is as apposite today as it was when written in 2009 – little changes in the BBC as it seems they are far too comfortable, with a tax funded monopoly to provide an honest and honourable service – it is widely noticed that they have massively dumbed down and pander to the gutter viewers, both in terms of language, content and style.

It would seem that the BBC is willing to hugely overpay their executives and offer an ever poorer quality backed by a number of safe backsides on their executive chairs to peddle neat propaganda and foul language as they have no need to compete being tax payert funded with a compulsory and hypothocated tax income unknown in any other area!

Sir Michael Lyons
Chairman
BBC Trust
Broadcasting House
London
W1A 1AA

29th August 2009

Dear Sir Michael,

With immediate effect, I am withholding my television licence fee, and as I intend to encourage many more people to do the same, I think it is rather important that you know why.

I realise that a single licence fee of £142.50 is a ‘drop in the ocean’ compared to the £3.36 billion annual income from this state-enforced licence tax, and a fraction of a percentage point of the obscene £141 million in loans from the European Investment Bank (EIB), but I feel that it will become a story in it’s own right. I have joined the Facebook group “10 Million for No TV Licence”, which at the time of writing, has 537,400 members.

I doubt that you will be surprised to learn that I am a member and prospective parliamentary candidate (PPC) of the U.K. Independence Party (UKIP). I intend to campaign within my party to introduce the proposition that our party adopts the abolition of the TV licence tax as policy in its Culture, Media and Sport portfolio.

My letters of complaint through the BBC’s normal channels, plus those of my friends and colleagues, have become an object lesson in futility, which is why several of us have taken this step. In many cases, the responses of the BBC are shared amongst the wider membership – more for ridicule than illumination – and are held as examples of anfractuous reasoning and needless digressions. Please note that I do not expect a point-by-point refutation of this letter, as some or all of the points will already have been inadequately answered by your Complaints Department. The request I am making is for a fundamental shift in the practice of political broadcasting, including conformity with legislation, guidelines and commissioned reports, and the basic concept of fairness.

My grievances

In my opinion, the BBC has, throughout both election periods stipulated below:

1)

Broken its covenant to “educate, inform and entertain” its audience. Virtually all of the output of all television channels has been aptly described by Peter Hitchens as “mental slurry”, and the BBC is as guilty as anyone of producing it

2)

Failed to provide adequate coverage or at least reflect the political views of people and interested parties in anything other than the three main political parties, i.e. Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat

3)

Treated the United Kingdom Independence Party as a single-issue, extremist party and never once asked them to explain or discuss their range of policies that have been in place for more than a year in the context of a serious discussion (I exclude the bromidic BBC 1 “Question Time” programme)

4)

Failed to take the concerns of many UKIP supporters over the accusations of unfair coverage in these election periods seriously

5)

Failed to follow its own “Editorial Guidelines (Politics and Public Policy) – Broadcasting during elections”, viz: “…news judgements at election time are made within a framework of democratic debate [your bold emphasis] which ensures that due weight is given to hearing the views and examining and challenging the policies of all parties. Significant minor parties should also receive some network coverage during the campaign.”

6)

By dint of points 2), 3) and 5), potentially and possibly interfered with, or at least attempted to affect, the outcome of two elections in contravention of its charter and UK laws

7)

Wilfully failed to observe Bridcut Principles 1 to 5 (listed in Appendix A), failed to provide Principle 8, and seemingly couldn’t care about 11 or 12.

8)

Underestimated the public need for radical change at the very heart of our political institutions, especially the House of Commons, by stifling all but mainstream opinion, and failed to reflect this view in a cross-party consensus

9)

Committed a breach of section 5.5. (and possibly others) of The Ofcom Broadcasting Code (Oct. 2008), viz:

“Due impartiality on matters of political or industrial controversy and matters relating to current public policy must be preserved on the part of any person providing a service (listed above). This may be achieved within a programme or over a series of programmes taken as a whole.”

10)

Continued it’s trashing of the image and reputation of our Royal family and its place in the affections of many British people and our state’s constitution, by persistent and unchallenged trivialisation, negative reporting and imagery, and denigration through BBC radio and TV “comedy” output. As a case in point, a ‘brand new comedy series’ on BBC Radio 4 on 21st August at 6:30 pm aimed at mocking the weeks headlines started in the first episode with a non-story from the Times turned into a ‘joke’ at the expense of Prince Edward, within two minutes of starting.

The straw that ‘broke the camels back’ for me was the by-election in Norwich North on 23rd July. I drove to Norwich to volunteer in Glenn Tingle’s campaign, and saw first hand the disgraceful media bias our candidate had to tolerate. This was only part of a profound and unsubtle anti-UKIP broadcasting policy by television and radio programming to deny a voice to a legitimate and respectable party – the fourth largest in UK politics, and second largest in European politics. The BBC actively promoted the Green Party as an alternative to the two main parties, without even mentioning UKIP on several occasions in its reportage.

4th June elections

In the approaching weeks to the June 4th County Council and European Parliament elections, I noticed the following transgressions:-

1.

Watching repeats of “Have I Got News For You” reminded me how, whenever UKIP is mentioned, it is merely for cheap ridicule and unfailingly we are represented by Robert Kilroy-Silk. The fact that he left the party in January 2005 doesn’t seem to trouble the programme makers or the BBC commissioning / editorial staff.

2.

On 8th May this year on Radio 4’s Today programme, after listening, I felt compelled to e-mail this complaint:-

This morning, Nigel Farage MEP was interviewed by James Naughtie. Throughout the interview, he constantly shuffled papers, and on my stereo, it sounded so close to the microphone that it almost drowned Mr. Farage out.

This is not the first time; far from it. He seems to make a habit of doing this when his vocal intonation betrays the fact that he feels dislike / derision for the subject of his interview.

Please ask him to desist.

The reply (typical of its kind) included this utter irrelevance:

James is an extremely experienced and well respected presenter…

A view not shared by me or the blogosphere apparently.

3.

In the 10:00 pm news on BBC 1 on or around 11th May, Nick Robinson –the BBC’s so-called Political Editor, was delivering a live piece to Huw Edwards in the studio from Westminster, about the MPs expenses scandal and its possible effects on the coming 4th June poll. He included this:-

…and when people are asked about how they might vote in the European elections, Labour is neck-and-neck at 19% with the U.K. Independence Party. A huge surge of support for them, that despite the fact that one of the MEPs they elected last time is currently in prison for being on benefit fraud [sic]. He was, I ought to say, expelled from the party.

This was clearly a reference to Ashley Mote, MEP. As many UKIP officials were tired of explaining even by then, Mote withheld vital information (a pending civil court case for housing benefit fraud) from the Party when he applied to us for candidature. This would have precluded him standing for any office in the party, much less a parliamentary seat. Ashley Mote was released from jail in November 2007 from his subsequent conviction, eighteen months before Mr. Robinson’s report. Nick Robinson was either wilfully and artfully propagandist, or woefully incompetent and outdated with his ‘facts’. In either case, is he a suitable journalist to hold the BBC’s most senior political reporting post, or was he merely ensuring that facts didn’t get in the way of a “good story”? Or obeying orders?

4.

In BBC1’s Question Time in May, a woman asked if the MP expenses scandal would give a boost to “….extremist parties like the BNP?” David Dimbleby asked her “By extremist, do you also mean UKIP?” Why? By whose criteria (apart from Dimbleby’s) is UKIP considered “extremist”?

5.

On 21st May edition of the same programme (from Salisbury), the normal complement of five ‘talking heads’ was bizarrely increased by the presence of Yasmin Alibi-Brown, the BBC’s favourite and ubiquitous rent-a-Leftie (and habitual interrupter), ensuring that Marta Andreasen’s contribution – as UKIP Treasurer – was kept to an absolute minimum.

6.

In Michael Ball’s Radio 2 programme on a Sunday morning before 4th June, Peter Riddell of The Times was the guest reviewer of the Sunday newspapers. I have admired Peter’s insights, analysis and writing for many years until, when discussing MPs expenses and the 4th June, he stated that ‘this will give a boost to “….extremist parties like the BNP and UKIP”…’

7.

On 3rd June, UKIP Leader Nigel Farage was interviewed by Emily Maitlis for BBC 2 Newsnight. It was shameful; hostile questioning is expected, but constant interruptions are not.

8.

On polling day – 4th June – there was virtually no coverage of the story behind multiple cases of an attempt at electoral fraud by councils up and down the country who issued ballot papers folded to obscure the UKIP box at the bottom of the paper. Nigel Farage threatened to demand a rerun of the European elections and demanded the resignation of Elections Minister Michael Wills because of fears that our party had lost votes as its name fell below the crease – machine formed in many cases – of the folded ballot paper. The Electoral Commission had to issue urgent advice to polling stations and returning officers to hand out unfolded ballot papers to voters. I heard nothing in the BBC news of this. The BNP claim that they picked up many votes this way that would otherwise have gone to us.

Post election

After 4th June elections, I noticed the following:

1.

In the BBC 1 Question Time programme on 11th June, UKIP was not mentioned once; not by the panel or the audience. For a programme that seeks to explore and discuss the week’s politics and current events, this is far more than extraordinary or coincidental. Presumably, this programme is recorded and then edited for broadcast, so only one of two scenarios is possible in this case; either a) no-one in that studio mentioned UKIP even once, or b) it was mentioned and then edited out. In the case of (a), this would be remarkable, as not only did UKIP poll second place in the European parliament elections, but were the only political party to increase their vote share on 2004 results. Surely someone would have raised this point? In addition, UKIP won several County Council seats, Labour no longer controlled a single county council in England and the Liberal Democrats reduced to one. Labour lost three quarters of their councillors in England and resulted with less than the Lib Dems. How could UKIP not have been mentioned?

2.

However, if point 1) seems odd, what is absolutely peculiar is that Question Time was followed – as usual – by “This Week”, but we fared no better. If there was a place for discussion and deep political analysis, it was here (I was a regular viewer). The only time UKIP was mentioned was by Diane Abbott MP, but it was dismissive and in passing. That Andrew Neil did not mention UKIP is just unfathomable!

3.

In the early hours of Monday 8th June as European ballot results were declared, Mike Nattrass MEP stated in his speech that he asked the BBC for a debate on the Lisbon Treaty with the Conservatives and other party representatives. Why was this cut from the edited highlights of his speech in the news?

4.

Nikki Sinclaire, who was elected as an MEP for the West Midlands, was invited on to BBC1’s The Politics Show of 14th June for the West Midlands and an interview by Sarah Falkland. Before this, on the national segment, Ken Clarke, Conservative MP was interviewed live about public spending, debt, the NHS and Royal Mail. Ms. Sinclaire was prevented from seeing any monitors in her time in the studio, so it is perhaps just as well that she wasn’t questioned on his responses to Jon Sopel’s questions.

5.

In an appallingly biased West Midlands segment on this programme, Susana Mendonça preceded an interview with “one of our regular commentators” – Prof. Mick Temple of Stafford University – with the fact that in the West Midlands, UKIP’s increase in vote share was the highest in the country. He said:

“I think UKIP have been very [his emphasis] lucky. Their performance has not been brilliant, they are themselves plagued by expenses scandals, and yet they picked up and extra seat in the West Midlands which quite frankly I don’t think they deserved! I think those Conservative voters who voted UKIP are going to come back to the Conservatives in a general election, but this is not a clear indication that the Conservatives will win the next general election; on the votes cast in the European and local elections, they’ll be lucky to scrape a working majority. That’s not good enough a year before an election.”

It is a political tenet of our age that many habitual voters of the three main parties vote UKIP in a European election because they trust us – almost more – than anyone else. This was mentioned to me, unprompted, by Conservatives at the county and European vote counts, even by Ms. Julie Kirkbride – my MP. It seems to be a revelation to Prof. Temple, who seems to be a professor of food science judging by these sour grapes and rotten tomatoes!

‘Deserved’? Why was no-one invited to offer a response to counter this ignorant nonsense, especially as Nikki Sinclaire MEP was sitting in the studio? If Mr. Temple had been on the campaign trail with UKIP activists in the region, he would have seen first-hand the enormous amount of hard work and personal investment made by ordinary people committed to bringing decent, honest change to British and European politics. It was rewarded in the vote share.

“A working majority”? Since the end of last year, polls have put the Conservatives at a minimum of 9%, and mostly this year in the 13 – 19% range, ahead of Labour. This by any measure would ensure a very healthy majority for the governing party.

Moreover, to which “expenses scandals” was he referring? Ashley Mote, as explained, was effectively nothing to do with UKIP, and Tom Wise is awaiting trial on such charges. Unless, like everyone else at the BBC and everyone they interview, he is presciently convinced of Mr. Wise’ guilt. Perhaps I’m alone in thinking it strange that I have never once heard mention on the BBC that the Conservative’s Chief Whip in the European parliament, Den Dover, was required to pay back £445,000 in “unaccountable expenditure”.

This same segment then went on to interview Michael Cashman, now the lone Labour MEP in the West Midlands. He said:

“UKIP as I said earlier, it’s a protest vote. They stand for one thing – pulling out. They were given an easy ride….the denunciation of all of the mainstream parties lifted UKIP and sadly, in other regions, gave oxygen and breath and support to the British National Party.”

More bilge. As I have pointed out in previous correspondence with your Complaints Department and on many weblog pages, if you starve UKIP of the oxygen of publicity, you may end up with some curious and undesirable election results. We were positively asphyxiated by the BBC, and lo and behold, Nick Griffin – BNP Leader – won an MEP seat in the North West.

(Every member of UKIP I have met detests the BNP as much as I, a fact of which I am immensely proud.) If UKIP had polled 17,000 more votes in that region, we would have taken that seat. I have heard people espouse the theory that effectively, the BBC actively campaigned for this BNP victory. Whatever anyone thinks of UKIP – propagandising and prejudices aside, we are nothing like the BNP; I speak as a three-year member. I also never tire of pointing out that in the 1980’s, the voices of Sinn Fein’s political leaders were dubbed by actors to – in theory – deny the IRA the ‘oxygen of publicity’. But at least their words got out.

Just as I thought this programme had cornered the market in ill-thought out nonsense and anti-UKIP propaganda with the previous two contributions, Susana Mendonça introduces an interview with Liz Lynne, Liberal Democrat MEP with this line:

“ …the fourth placed Liberal Democrats, who keep their one MEP in the region, warn that UKIP’s success is bad news for the Midlands.”

Liz Lynne MEP said:

“If you don’t get MEPs going in there to work, then they can’t stand up for their constituents so I hope they will change their mind. I hope they will engage with the whole process to make sure we have more jobs coming into this region, more funding coming into this region. That is what the job of an MEP is.

I don’t think Mike Nattrass MEP needs to be reminded of that, as he is the only person – anywhere – to tell us that in October last year, the EU parliament approved a €97 million subsidy for bullfighting (after we banned foxhunting), and a €305 million subsidy for growing some of the most carcinogenic tobacco known to man (after we banned smoking in public places). He also tells us of lost contracts due to EU Legislation (e.g. for British trucks that went to Austria instead of LDV in his constituency – sealing their fate) and exorbitant conformity on-costs, the chicanery of the EU Budget, the obscenity of the Common Agricultural Policy, a collapsing parliament roof (Strasbourg – which could have killed 300 people if the EU parliament was sitting), and police assaults on legitimate protestors. He also warned us that the British and French were attempting to set up an EU Navy – to the alarm of British admirals. UKIP’s MEPs carry out sterling work, making sure that the unsustainable lunacy of the European Project is exposed, while MEPs of other parties slavishly toe the line and spuriously defend our membership.

How exactly was Liz Lynne describing “bad news” for ‘the Midlands’? East and West? Why does she think that they will do no work? Judging by results, Mike Nattrass works far harder at being an MEP than the others from whom I‘ve heard nothing. Whatsoever. (By the way, in a recent survey of the most effective MEPs in the European Parliament conducted by the Taxpayers Alliance, a UKIP MEP was rated 7th of 783 in a league table of effectiveness, with seven Labour MEPs – including Michael Cashman – in the bottom ten. And yet here he was berating UKIP.

Later in the national segment, Ken Clarke was again interviewed, this time on the Irish referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. Again, this was unchallenged, even though Mr. Clarke is a passionate Europhile who is utterly opposed to any referendum by any government on any issue. This despite a poll on ConservativeHome weblog showing that 84% of Conservative party members want a British referendum on the Lisbon Treaty even if it is ratified by all member states.

In all, an utterly disgraceful programme.

Norwich North

In the campaign up to the Norwich North by-election of 23rd July, I noticed the following:

1)

Throughout BBC news coverage on TV and radio, several activists including myself, who had arrived from various parts of the country to help Glenn Tingle’s campaign, noticed that the only party mentioned other than the three main parties was the Green Party.

2)

On BBC 2 Newsnight on Wednesday 15th July in a segment centred in Norwich, interviews were conducted with the three main party candidates. This was followed by an interview with someone from Pitman Training in Norwich. Then, UKIP candidate Glenn Tingle was

given a few seconds, but in a resulting montage graphic of four squares, what was shown? Conservative, Labour, Liberal Democrat candidates… and a classroom at Pitman Training! We assumed they also had a candidate in the election!

3)

In the same programme, a BBC News East reporter went to a home for elderly people in Norwich, and interviewed four ladies. When he asked them who they would vote for, they said “Not the Conservatives or Labour!” (A moment’s silence). “The Greens?” asked the reporter! “Yes, the Greens. We think!” came the reply.

4)

Whose decision was it to exclude Glenn Tingle, UKIP candidate, from a televised hustings programme only days before the election?

5)

On the evening before my departure, I was told of the existence of a memorandum that was sent from senior BBC management in London to news chiefs at BBC East HQ in Norwich, to the effect that ‘the Green party were to be treated as the fourth party in the by-election coverage, and that UKIP was to be treated the same as the BNP’. Does (or did) such a memo exist, if so who originated this policy, who wrote it, to whom was it sent, who oversaw its compliance, and what do you intend to do about this gross breach of the BBC Charter? The bias we had seen in preceding days certainly seems to confirm its existence.

6)

In an web article entitled “Five key lessons from Norwich North” (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8167588.stm), BBC Chief Political Correspondent James Landale writes:

“Third, the anti-politics, anti-politician, expenses-fuelled vote did not coalesce around any particular party or candidate. The Greens, UKIP and the former diplomat Craig Murray picked up some expenses-driven protest votes but not enough to matter.”

Really? At 4,068 votes, this was UKIP’s strongest ever showing in a parliamentary election (which barely did credit to an excellent candidate), but less than 800 votes behind the Liberal Democrats. With fair media coverage, who knows what could have been achieved? The BBC’s much-touted and fancied Green Party came fifth. James Landale appears to reflect – accurately – the BBC view of the British political spectrum.

Bias

For the purpose of brevity, I’ve avoided traversing the minefield that is BBC radio “comedy”. It is an odd experience to hear an audience laughing when nothing funny had been said, but I am getting used to Marcus Brigstocke (and the 6:30pm Radio 4 slot) by now. I doubt I’ll ever get used to Sue Perkins who recently said: “UKIP. Tossers!” bizarrely out of context in a programme as unmemorable as it was un-entertaining.

In an article written for the Daily Telegraph on 24th July entitled “Anti-UKIP and pro-Green: the BBC at its most blatantly biased”, Daniel Hannan, a Conservative MEP wrote:

Throughout the campaign, it ran programmes with Conservative, Labour, LibDem and Green spokesmen…. But there was no basis to the claim that they were the fourth party, either nationally or locally. The last test of electoral feeling was June’s European election. The United Kingdom Independence Party won 13 seats and came second; the Greens won two seats and came fifth. In local elections on the same day, UKIP beat the Greens in most Norwich North wards.

He continued:

Newsnight, Look East and Radio 4 all chose to disregard UKIP and treat the Greens as the main story. Three days before the poll, the BBC’s Eastern region TV held a hustings meeting for four candidates: Conservative, Labour, LibDem and Green.

What was the result in the event? UKIP won 11.8 per cent of the vote ‐ comfortably ahead of the Greens and remarkably close to the LibDems (or “worryingly close” as I just heard a Radio 5 Live presenter put it).

One of the responses to Mr. Hannan’s blog (by ‘Patrick’) was this: On the Saturday before the Euro elections, Today ran a five minute attack on UKIP written by Mark Mardell, the BBC Europe editor. It was a total hatchet job with Mardell first telling us what the other parties in Brussels thought of UKIP (they did not like it) and then giving us his own opinion ‐ that UKIP were profoundly unserious golf club militants who had not been made prefects when they were at school.

I am not really a UKIP supporter, since I am rather to their left (although I did vote for them in protest after hearing that), but I made a formal complaint which was just brushed off.

The BBC’s Europe Editor should not tell us his negative opinions of any party in the days before an election ‐ so I am very pleased that Daniel Hannan as a conservative is making this post. A complaint from him to the BBC Trust, about the treatment of a party which he opposes, would carry a lot of weight. The BBC can just ignore the ordinary licence payer.

Like many people in UKIP, I constantly wonder if the soft loans from the EIB have had an effect on output. Although the BBC refuted the suggestion that there would be any effect on the editorial process at the time, one of the conditions of EIB loans is that the aims of the E.U. are promoted and furthered. I, for one, am bewildered as to why an organisation such as the BBC that raises £3.36 billion annually, with almost guaranteed supra-inflationary increases by state-mandated taxation, needs to borrow £141 million from such a source that places its editorial integrity under question. Looking at the quality of BBC output, I am mystified as to where it is spent.

Or is the BBC simply taking orders from 10, Downing Street? To expose the European Union for the fraudulent, inept, overweening, corrupt and devious mess that we think it is might set the British people to question why we are a member of such an organisation, its second largest funder, and cause people to actually question what has been done in their name and with their money but without their electoral mandate.

Conclusion

I turn to the Bridcut Report, “From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel”. It contains Twelve Guiding Principles to ensure impartiality, which I have reproduced in Appendix A. The BBC Trust webpage states the following:

The report is the result of a project first commissioned by the BBC Board of Governors in conjunction with BBC management in November 2005 to identify the challenges and risks to impartiality. The report has been fully endorsed by the BBC Trust, the BBC Executive Board and the BBC Journalism Board.

Endorsed it may have been, although this carries little significant meaning. It is a great shame that it was not ‘embraced’, or even adopted.

As much to blame for this situation are spineless and devious politicians. BBC funding appears to be a ‘third rail’ in British politics – ‘touch it and you die’, but this should not prevent the issue from being addressed. An iniquitous system such as the licence tax cannot be maintained, and this has been stated by commissioned reports, astute and intelligent individuals, and even James Murdoch at the recent McTaggart Lecture in the Edinburgh Television Festival.

Now that I have fully realised that I cannot trust BBC output on news and political coverage, I am reduced to watching one hour of television per week. It is a BBC programme – Dragon’s Den – a fascinating programme which is available on BBC iPlayer, obviating the need for a television. My views, in common with millions of people in this country, are not represented, so why should I pay the BBC licence tax? A programme that I always thought I would like to see made would be a ‘PPC’s only’ version of BBC1’s Question Time for the four main parties, with each party HQ providing a parliamentary candidate of their choice, just before the general election. Given the way the BBC currently reports politics, with its policy of deliberate exclusion of UKIP I do not see this happening.

I intend to use every technological means to achieve the objective I have stated. I will change my mind and resume payment when I detect a sea-change in attitudes towards political coverage on the BBC and it becomes fair and balanced in proportion to a range of electoral results and more representative of reasoned public opinion. In the meantime, I believe a full, independent public enquiry should be launched into the BBC coverage on TV and radio of both election periods, to investigate my charge in point 5) in Grievance above; hence the distribution list below.

I personally believe that British politics is changing profoundly. The effects of the internet, blogging, scandals, and a detachment of the political and media classes from the mood and opinions of the public are coming to a head. Between the general elections of 2001 and 2005, the Labour Party lost 64% of its membership. The number of new members joining UKIP increased our total membership by13% ….between April and July this year.

Yours sincerely,

Steven W. Morson

Prospective parliamentary candidate

UKIP – Bromsgrove.

Appendix A

The Twelve Guiding Principles of the Bridcut report.

1. Impartiality is and should remain the hallmark of the BBC as the leading provider of information and entertainment in the United Kingdom, and as a pre-eminent broadcaster internationally. It is a legal requirement, but it should also be a source of pride.

2. Impartiality is an essential part of the BBC’s contract with its audience, which owns and funds the BBC. Because of that, the audience itself will often be a factor in determining impartiality.

3. Impartiality must continue to be applied to matters of party political or industrial controversy. But in today’s more diverse political, social and cultural landscape, it requires a wider and deeper application.

4. Impartiality involves breadth of view, and can be breached by omission. It is not necessarily to be found on the centre ground.

5. Impartiality is no excuse for insipid programming. It allows room for fair-minded, evidence-based judgments by senior journalists and documentary makers, and for controversial, passionate and polemical arguments by contributors and writers.

6. Impartiality applies across all BBC platforms and all types of programme. No genre is exempt. But the way it is applied and assessed will vary in different genres.

7. Impartiality is most obviously at risk in areas of sharp public controversy. But there is a less visible risk, demanding particular vigilance, when programmes purport to reflect a consensus for “the common good”, or become involved with campaigns.

8. Impartiality is often not easy. There is no template of wisdom which will eliminate fierce internal debate over difficult dilemmas. But the BBC’s journalistic expertise is an invaluable resource for all departments to draw on.

9. Impartiality can often be affected by the stance and experience of programme makers, who need constantly to examine and challenge their own assumptions.

10. Impartiality requires the BBC to examine its own institutional values, and to assess the effect they have on its audiences.

11. Impartiality is a process, about which the BBC should be honest and transparent with its audience: this should permit greater boldness in its programming decisions. But impartiality can never be fully achieved to everyone’s satisfaction: the BBC should not be defensive about this but ready to acknowledge and correct significant breaches as and when they occur.

12. Impartiality is required of everyone involved in output. It applies as much to the most junior researcher as it does to the director general. But editors and executive producers must give a strong lead to their teams. They must ensure that the impartiality process begins at the conception of a programme and lasts throughout production: if left until the approval stage, it is usually too late.

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

I first published Steve Morson’s letter at:

CLICK HERE

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~

.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337 -
number witheld calls are blocked & calls are recorded.

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS, >SEARCH< & >Side Bars< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’ archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General ‘Stuff’ ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com

Skype: GregL-W

TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU
  
 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in UKIP, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

>GUEST POST: The Evils of Catholicism & Bronze Age Superstitions

Posted by Greg Lance-Watkins on 07/06/2014

>GUEST POST: The Evils of Catholicism & Bronze Age Superstitions

.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins – Greg_L-W.

.

willpwilson 908
Catholic mass grave sites of 350,800 missing children found
Sat Jun 7, 2014 03:57
65.73.182.69

 

Posted on June 7, 2014

Message News Board: http://disc.yourwebapps.com/Indices/149495.html

Catholic mass grave sites of 350,800 missing children found in:

Ireland,

Spain,

Canada

- http://childabuserecovery.com/ -
http://childabuserecovery.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Childrens-dining-room-Sean-Ross-Abbey.jpg - The atrocity of close to 800 emaciated childrens’ bodies buried in a Irish Nuns’ septic tank represented the 34th child mass grave site linked this week to the Catholic Church. Pope Francis was being prosecuted by the International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ) in Brussels for allegedly trafficking 300,000 children of political prisoners through Vatican Catholic Charities during Argentine’s Dirty War. According to witness testimony last week some of those orphans ended up in a child mass grave site in Spain. Last year’s ICLCJ prosecution concerned 50,000 missing native Canadian children. There have been 32 child mass grave sites uncovered so far in Canada, most of them on Catholic-run native residential school grounds.

Unfortunately the over 350,800 children suspected to be in Catholic child mass graves sites in three countries paled in number to Catholic Priest sex abuse victims across the globe. As of November 2013 over ten million Catholic Priest child sex abuse cases have been documented as shown here. These 10,077,574 cases represented a mere fraction of total crimes committed. Only an estimated 10% of sex abuse victims were thought to speak out about their sex abuse and just 10% of those cases saw the inside of a court room.

Amnesty has been offered to citizens or employees of the Crown of England and Vatican willing to give sworn testimony or evidence that leads to the prosecution of top Vatican and government officials who may have committed crimes. For providing evidence rewards up to 10,000 euros or around 13,660 dollars was available through the ICLCJ court.

The Irish child mass grave site containing bodies of children from age two days to nine years, was located at a now-defunct Catholic home for unwed mothers. According to death records, the little ones were fragile, pot-bellied, emaciated and died as late as 1961 from malnutrition and infectious diseases such as measles and TB.

Children of the Canadian Catholic native residential schools were determined to have been murdered or died of malnutrition, human experimentation, torture, Small Pox infection or as Eyewitness Irene Favel testified in this video, were thrown into a furnace. Favel claimed that in 1944 she witnessed a newborn infant incinerated by a priest at Muscowegan Catholic Indian School, Saskatchewan Canada. The child torture was documented for court in Kevin Annett’s “Hidden No Longer” available for free here.

The Bon Secours Sisters ran the Irish mass grave site and “mother and baby home” called St Mary’s in Tuam north of Galway city. The Catholic “home” had a reputation for children dying at a rate four times higher than the rest of Ireland. Unwed mothers were punished as “atonement for their sins” by being forced to give up their children and working for two or three years without wages.

The 2013 award-winning drama film “Philomena” depicted the plight of 2,200 infants who survived Ireland’s Catholic homes. The children were forcibly adopted or placed into child labor situations, mainly in the US. Catholic officials have consistently denied they received payments for these so-called “adoptions” and insisted verifying documents were lost in a fire.

The Vatican, British Crown and Canadian government have refused excavation of the 32 Canadian mass grave sites believed filled with native children. Before licensed archeologists were turned away, human remains of children were uncovered at the larger sites in Brantford Ontario and Port Alberni British Columbia Canada.

Critics contended the Catholic Church had an ongoing reluctance to hand over internal records of Vatican Catholic Charities out of fear further horrors could come to light. Such was in the case of the Irish Magdalene Laundries where unwed mothers performed forced labor without compensation to four Catholic orders. After years of successful litigation on the case victims still remain uncompensated.

A present day victim of the Catholic Church was Jamaican and British Soldier Vivian Cunningham. He remained drugged in the St. George’s Hospital in Stafford England (ph: 44 01785 257888) for asking questions about Queen Elizabeth’s arrest warrant. The 2013 ICLCJ court found Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip guilty of kidnapping on Oct. 10 1964, ten native children from the Catholic-owned Kamloops residential school in British Columbia Canada. British citizen David Compan and his wife were accosted, drugged, arrested and incarcerated without charges in the London Park Royal Mental Health Center. Compan’s sin? He posted Queen Elizabeth’s arrest warrant on a Catholic Church in London. Compan’s arrest was captured in this video.

The Roman Catholic Church has “systematically” protected predator priests, allowing “tens of thousands” of children to be abused, a United Nations committee reported directly after Pope Francis became pontiff. In May the United Nations Committee Against Torture gave the Vatican one year to demonstrate their commitment to recommendations made in their latest UN report on Crimes Against Children by the Catholic Church.

The ICLCJ court case in Brussels charging Pope Francis and other global elites for Crimes Against Humanity was expected to extend for over a year. Last year’s ICLCJ court found 40 global elites guilty and ended with the unprecedented resignation of former Pope Ratzinger.

The ICLCJ has over 450 Common Law Peace Officers in 13 countries, with 51 local chartered groups operating. Local organizing funds were available through the ITCCS for common law groups that applied. To contact officers of the court or Kevin Annett email or call: itccscentral@gmail.com, info@iclcj.com, admin@iclcj.com, hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com, 250-591-4573 (Canada), 386-323-5774 (USA)

 

.
Regards,

Greg_L-W.
.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337 -
number witheld calls are blocked & calls are recorded.

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS, >SEARCH< & >Side Bars< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’ archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General ‘Stuff’ ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com

Skype: GregL-W

TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU
  
 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Catholic, Catholic Child Abuse, Mass Graves, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

IN MEMORIAM of ‘D’ Day

Posted by Greg Lance-Watkins on 06/06/2014

.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins – Greg_L-W.

.

IN MEMORIAM of ‘D’ Day

.

5th. June – 70 Years Ago

Hi,

late in the afternoon 70 years ago my Mother got permision to slip away early from her secret radio ops. base near London – on condition she remained in Uniform – she had no idea why she had to wear uniform but what the hell it got her off ops. early!

She was WRAF and now firmly grounded as her newly married husband said that 2 in the air was too many!

Father had arranged to fly into Biggin Hill for a brief overnight stay and they were meeting for an early supper with some friends in a hotel near Croydon airport.

They had dinner and everyone drifted away early. Later that night my Father slid quietly from their bedroom setting an alarm for my Mother – She was on orders and Father had just broken orders!!

Mother heard the alarm and rapidly got up – not quite sure why she had to – dressed, rather blearily in the dark and was on the front steps of the hotel just as dawn was breaking. Those were her instructions!!

Just as dawn broke she heard the familiar roar of Merlin Engines as a wing of Spitfires flew at roof top over the hotel waggling their wings – she spent the next 10 minutes helping a cleaning lady clear up the mess she made falling over a bucket of soapy water as she dived for cover!

Then the sprint back to her station where at every opportunity for the rest of the day she tuned in to listen to my Father’s squadron as it provided the air cover on the beaches of the Normandy Landings.

1,000s died to give you and I our liberty!

The Normandy Beaches
6th. June 1944
Where They Gave Their Lives For You

Only to be betrayed by political filth just a few decades later.

Few things in my life have revolted me more than the glib willingness of the scum of the earth to squabble and back stab to get their snouts in the troughs on The EU Gravy Train.

Even less edifying have been the filth that has crawled out of the gutters to lie and cheat, plot and scheme against decent honest people, who have no interest in personal reward, yet seek to liberate these United Kingdoms from under the heel of those to whom our politicians have betrayed us.

Richard North made a very simple but very understanding comment on his Blog:

In a demonstration of raw courage, ingenuity, determination and sheer power, on 6 June 1944 the combined Allied Armies launched the greatest invasion fleet in the history of man onto the shores of Normandy – a feat never since equalled and never likely to be repeated.

Many arrived – many fewer left. We owe them a great deal.

But Richard has a better understanding of the betrayal of Britain by Politicians and a clear understanding of young men in battle, let down by the politicians who betrayed them and the senior officers jockeying for position, do read his New book – Details CLICK HERE

“In politics, stupidity is not a handicap.”
Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821),

.
Regards,

Greg_L-W.
.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337 -
number witheld calls are blocked & calls are recorded.

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS, >SEARCH< & >Side Bars< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’ archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General ‘Stuff’ ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com

Skype: GregL-W

TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU
  
 

Posted in D-Day, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

>GUEST POST Another View of The Bilderbergers

Posted by Greg Lance-Watkins on 13/05/2014

>GUEST POST Another View of The Bilderbergers

.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins – Greg_L-W.

.

Amazing diagram shows who really runs the World
Posted on 05/07/2012 by Stewart Cowan
bilderberg_diagram

BILDERBERG_DIAGRAM 01
CLICK ON THE PICTURE FOR MUCH LARGER IMAGE

Who really runs the World? Well, it’s not you or I, obviously. It isn’t even the politicians. This amazing diagram gives a much better idea. The Bilderberg Group is becoming increasingly well known due to members of the public and various groups exposing them. Just a few years ago, its existence was just a “conspiracy theory”, but when these billionaires, corporate CEOs, global policymakers and other bigwigs head off to a luxury hotel around the same time each year, then it is hard to deny, especially now that the mainstream media have been sending photographers to witness the limos depositing their expensive cargoes at the door. It probably isn’t worth them sending reporters as well, because what is discussed is not released. But if it was Brad Pitt and Madonna arriving, rather than Henry Kissinger and Kenneth Clarke, most people would have been excitedly talking about it for years, but it’s only politics, so who cares? It’s not important!

Clearly, very few people understand, and some choose to ignore, the real political power structures, labelling them “conspiracy theories” and preferring instead to be entertained and sometimes enraged by the left-right mud fight we are presented with by the mainstream media as “reality”, while the elites do exactly the same thing behind the scenes regardless of which of their puppet leaders has won the election.

It’s like if you were kicked and robbed by a puppeteer and you catch up with him and start getting angry and upset with his Punch and Judy dolls, while he laughs his head off at your unbelievable stupidity.

You can especially imagine the global cabal laughing at the US Presidential race. Such an extravaganza and it means next to nothing, because whoever gets in will further the elite agenda. If this means more war, more political correctness, more attacks on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, more rights for illegal immigrants for social engineering purposes, then this is exactly what the American people will be subjected to, regardless of who “wins” the election. Anyone who genuinely tries to change the system in a major way, like JFK, gets eliminated. It is not surprising that these shadow rulers will take such desperate measures when you look at the trouble they have gone to with setting up thousands of foundations and other groups to change the world we live in.

As if all of this wasn’t bad enough, a recent report said that 27,000 “charitable” groups rely on the taxpayer for more than 75 per cent of their income.

Many of the charities lobby for the pet causes of politicians, according to the Institute of Economic Affairs. The environment, public health, foreign aid, inequality and women’s rights are areas that have been ‘particularly blessed’.

Or, in other words, promoting green issues and political correctness! These two things are absolutely vital to the success of the plan for global governance and the emerging new world religion based on Gaia worship. As I understand, it was decided in the 1970s to use variations in the earth’s climate as a weapon for social change, only in those days, the boffins thought we were heading towards a new ice age.

It is quite simple to see how the system works; how the elitists have devised a structure whereby they get their instructions down through the ranks, so that even the lowliest of local council employees will toe the line.

As we see more and more, there are measures being put into place to root out dissenters: those who will not go along with the new social order. Christians have a history of causing trouble for corrupt regimes around the World, so giving them a hard time at work over the simplest of things, like jewellery or offering to pray for someone, will reduce the problem for our masters.

This is how you rule the World! You don’t have to be a James Bond villain and do it the old-fashioned way; you need to be clever and organised. You no longer need to bump off your enemies with a laser weapon fired from a speeding car or by covertly sidling up to them in the street and stabbing them in the leg with the tip of an umbrella which has been dipped in a rare South American venom with no known antidote. Total elimination still goes on of course, but most people can just be deactivated in the sense that they can no longer influence their society. In the Soviet Union, dissenters were often accused of having a mental illness and locked up in gulags for years. This will happen here too, as more calls go out from the social engineers to make things like climate change “denial” a crime.

This vast number of “astroturfing” so-called charities exists to create the illusion of widespread grassroots movements for the sole intention of allowing the government to fool the people into thinking it has the right, even the duty, to change society (in the way that they planned to do all along – or rather, have been told to do by instructions dripping down through the elite machinery). But the people who run these organisations play on our trust, generosity and good nature, when they use their “charities” not to feed the hungry, house the homeless or provide urgent medical treatment, but to lobby politicians and buy advertising space to promote their ideas.

No wonder we lose such a huge proportion of our earnings in tax. Can you imagine how large a comprehensive diagram would be when you include tens of thousands of “charities” (that’s in the UK alone) and all the other groups, institutes and panels telling us what’s “best” for us and our society?

Hey, they’ve done a great job so far, haven’t they?

So, what is it all about? Why such an immense effort by a tiny cabal of individuals to change the world?

Because there are too many people in the World for their liking and some of us need to die and the rest of us need to be slaves to serve them.

This requires the world’s population to be very tightly controlled and so we have this intricate network of councils and institutes and steering committees to see that this happens. In the UK we now live in a very socialist society. Private ownership is still allowed, but under threat from a poor economy and legislation. The socialised healthcare and education systems and state pensions and the state broadcaster (BBC) might look good and there are some benefits, of course, but it will bring us all the more readily into a global socialist system of governance under the auspices of the people and organisations on that diagram. This is why they fund the political correctness agenda too, to destroy national cultures and of course, the family. Lenin said, “Destroy the family you destroy the country”.

Lenin also said that, “The goal of socialism is communism”.

It’s a fallen world, so there will be no political Utopia, and we should at least stop playing this ridiculous left vs right political game and start realising that we don’t have any influence in dictating policy when the MPs we elect are subject to puppet leaders. Just look at the number of policy-creating bodies on the Bilderberg diagram! They really couldn’t care less what we say. It doesn’t matter if your view is the same as the vast majority in the country, your opinion will not be suffered if it is contrary to the agenda.

Something else I found interesting from the Bilderberg diagram was that there are only a few women on the “team”. They have spread their politically correct poison over the Earth and expect everyone else to abide by quotas, but clearly exempt themselves.

They will understand the importance of a patriarchal society. There is a number of fraternal, men only, societies on the diagram too. But the globalists are undermining the man’s role in order to destroy the family to destroy the society to control it themselves. But they have made it all about “equality” which makes it difficult to argue against with some people.

And I know some people who are clued up about the Bilderbergers and other elitist groups, yet they still go along with political correctness because they think it doesn’t affect them. They might say to me something like, “If you don’t like gay ‘marriage’ don’t marry a man.” This may sound like faultless logic, but it isn’t. Social engineering changes the whole society and affects everyone in it. It is part of a much larger and very wicked agenda and promoted via an immense web of institutions. Our leading politicians further this agenda against the wishes of the majority because they have sold us out.

I just want to mention another piece of the global jigsaw here: the attacks on the Islamic world. These countries are/were largely outside of the control of the globalists and when you think you own the world, that is an awfully large part to be excluded from, so they get “democracy” bombed into them. Not because Western leaders are caring and kind, but because Western elites are greedy and murderous and tragically, but unsurprisingly, they have found many willing cohorts in politics to carry out the massacres on their behalf. Tony Blair and George W. Bush spring most rapidly to mind.

A year before the 9/11 attacks, at least two of the people on the diagram, Neocons Paul Wolfowitz at two o’clock and Bill Kristol at five, contributed to the PNAC document called “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century” in which they stated that change would take a long time without a “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” [Link to pdf]

Millions of people agree that planning for this event was already in the pipeline and not from a cave in Afghanistan. This really was a catalyzing event. We hear talk of all sorts of things being justified “post 9/11″. It has made a lot of things change in a very short time.

Life is cheap to these people. Very, very cheap. It is hardly surprising that these are the people pushing abortion and have persuaded half the world through their systems of control that it is a “woman’s right”. And these are the people who are making the new ‘norms’ for society and I get persuaded by normally well-meaning people to go along with it?

I will never go along with it.

——-

The diagram is from CLICK HERE

To view the original article CLICK HERE

.
Regards,

Greg_L-W.
.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337 -
number witheld calls are blocked & calls are recorded.

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS, >SEARCH< & >Side Bars< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’ archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General ‘Stuff’ ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com

Skype: GregL-W

TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU
  
 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Bilderberg Group, BILDERBERG;, Common Purpose, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 188 other followers

%d bloggers like this: